The Irony Of Making An Argument

In essence, an argument is a collection of statements or ideas that are intended to support a point. Contradictory to what many people think, an argument does not need sides nor right or wrong. All an argument needs is a point to be made, and reasons supporting this point. This one statement has vast implications on what has been commonly defined as an argument, and what is treated as an argument. Moreover, it removes the connotation of an argument as being fiery.
Wow, I love your introduction! For example, in math, we can call an equation the point of the argument, and the proof that brought the equation, the premise or the reason that the argument is true. Arguments are claims backed up by evidence. The argument can rely on the evidence …show more content…
Drawing from the last statement, the sketch from Monty Python did not show us a two-sided argument because all the arguer did to Monty was contradict him by saying yes or no, except for the one time where he said that he is "arguing in his spare time". In that one time, he uses a logical point to raise his point, making an argument. Monty responds sometimes with a simple yes or no, or making points in order to make an argument in order to show the man that his argument isn't, in fact, an argument. The irony is very clear here. Moreover, this means that arguments that have the strawman fallacy, are not true arguments because, while they have a premise, that premise is an insult or misrepresentation, therefore, the point is missed. Furthermore, whenever you think of something in your head, and weigh the pros and cons, you're making an argument. If you decide what you should eat, you're making an argument. You're making several reasons to eat each meal and deciding which one would be better to eat today based on those reasons. Then, one can conclude that arguments are very common in human speech, as an argument is a point supported by reasons or premises. And, that is the majority of human