Cultural Differences Between Farmers And Foragers

Superior Essays
Throughout history of civilizations within society, we have learned ways of “adapting” to time, location, and within groups. Immediately, we assume that making progress is beneficiary. New ideas are brought up to dominate and replace old technology, but those new ideas are not easily accomplished. Before new ideas were established, it took a lot of time to accomplish the task. Societies in the world adapted to the creation of the first automobiles replacing horse buggies. One of the greatest inventions of time is farming. However, agricultural farming did not automatically produce a successful outcome. Some people wanted to dramatically adapt from foraging to farming. In some places like Australia, Aborigines refused to accept agriculture …show more content…
Foragers intended to use the environment’s abundance of wild animals and plants to their advantage. These foragers enjoyed hunting and gathering and preferred to take the more convenient way of life. This allowed them to have more time observing nature and thinking about what they see in nature. Art has given anthropologists to understand their way of life and key elements of the foragers’ culture. One could argue that the life of the foragers made a small impact on the environment. On the other hand, farmers arguably used agriculture forming interdependence between humans, plants, and animals. Farmers relied on livestock such as cattle to provide meat and milk while domesticated animals relied on farmers for reproduction. Farmers wanted to challenge evolution; therefore, farmers made a great impact on the environment, creating a demand for labor and hard work. Although farmers challenged the course of nature, foragers used the environment to their advantage causing abundance of food and crops that can never be …show more content…
Farming over time would eventually become beneficiary with the help of modern advances to irrigation systems, but it did not happen successfully in early civilizations. Farming is more inconvenient than foraging because it demands more energy to get the same amount of nourishment as foraging. The progress of adapting from foraging to farming gave food to be less dependable because people were limited to food they could plant over the land. They could only plant a few crops on farms and it seems apparent that diseases became more widespread from domesticated animals to humans. Foraging became more convenient for these early civilizations and people thrive from the high level of nutrients by hunting animals and eating wild

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Neolithic transition brought with it the change from subsistence farming to sedentary agricultural lifestyles. The development of sedentary farming communities brought the Neolithic era an influx of new technology that makes this era a monumental marker for human history. These communities also brought new techniques for planting, fertilizing, and selecting seeds which all created larger yields and increased the reliance on sedentary cultivation. They also may be responsible for the decline of women's' social and economic positions in society that still affect people today. By 3500 B.C. people in the Middle East supported enough nonagricultural people to begin the first civilizations by using technology and tools such as digging sticks,…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within Ronald Wright’s novel, A Short History of Progress, the concept of a “progress trap” is explored. Described by Wright, a “progress trap” is a situation in which humans establish a dependence upon new technology or techniques that have been integrated into societal structures to help “improve” human living conditions. This newly developed technology or knowledge can become paramount in society and critical to the survival of the transformed civilization. At this point, a loop of “progress trap” development can begin to occur.…

    • 2114 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a hunter gatherer society, you would have to go out and get food constantly in order to survive. You would also not be able to live in large groups. If you were to live in a farming society, you would have the ability to domesticate plants and animals, which leads to increase in food supply. With an increased food supply, you would have enough food to properly sustain larger groups of people. Crops allowed agriculture based societies to form and the world’s population to grow.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Animal Domestication

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The domestication of animals and plants played a significant role in the lives of Neolithic people. Throughout the Paleolithic Age, groups of people hunted for animals and gathered naturally grown food. As T. Walter Wallbank mentioned, “Often described as the ‘first economic revolution’ in the history of man, this momentous change from a food-gathering to a food-producing economy initiated the Neolithic Age” (Document 1). Agriculture and economics became an important factor during this revolution. This concept is also pointed out in the comic by the Science Museum of Minnesota, “Plant and animal domestication is the key.…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A long time ago Hunter-Gatherers was the main way of getting food and resources needed to survive. Hunter-Gatherer is defined as “a member of a nomadic people who live chiefly by hunting, fishing, and harvesting wild food”. Back then they had no social hierarchy, no powers, and no special building used for religious beliefs. In today’s society we have evolved into farmers which agriculture and farming came in slowly. Farming is defined as “the activity or business of growing crops and raising livestock”.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people view agriculture as the key to success in human history and that it ultimately led humans to become civilized. In fact, the reasons are plausible. With agriculture present, humans were able to efficiently find food and store crops. Their unoccupied time was used to create marvelous architecture, compose musical masterpieces, and much more that we associate with the unique attributes that separate humans from animals. However, with good follows bad.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The author presents his claim that the idea of agriculture was detrimental to our lives as human beings, and he goes on in the rest of the article to support this argument with scientific evidence provided by various paleopatholigists and his own personal experiences. Though the article is classified as an editorial, the author visits New Guinea and uses his experiences there to further his claim. This conflict is present throughout the text, for the author portrays his view of the effect of agriculture on the primitive and modern lives of human beings. He believes that agriculture posed as a threat to our advancement as human beings and opposes the idea altogether.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Plows that were now made with iron, made planting easier in varying soil conditions. The innovation that changed the farmers’ life the most was the tractor. “Farmers’ fortunes were also enhanced by technological improvements, most notably steam-traction engines and then gasoline-powered tractors … Tractors reduced the number of hours of labor needed to produce crops, compensated for a growing scarcity of workers, and then freed millions of acres for food production that had been used to support horses and mules (Inventing America, p. 629-630). Tractors enable farmers to be able to grow more at a lower cost.…

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jared Diamond’s article “The Worst Mistake in the Human Race” provides critical insight to what archaeologists and anthropologists alike have contested to be the pinnacle of human advancement. Agriculture to many people among academic settings has been mutually agreed as one of the turning points from primal to civilized (Diamond, 1999); and has been known to benefit humanity for it’s greater good. Jared Diamond challenges this point in his article. He begins by introducing a progressivist view, which is the held notion that agriculture was adopted simply because it is a means of getting more food for less work (Diamond, 1999). Diamond thoroughly explains that there are advantages to agriculture, being that of convenience and mass production…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Christopher Columbus landed in the new world in 1492, he discovered a group of peoples and named them Indians. The Natives seemed to be uncivilized and lack humanism, often thought to be savages. However, the English were the real savages in their crusade to inflict their religion on anyone who wasnt English. Indians were unevolved compared to the mighty English. At this point Native Americans have yet to discover the horse.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Farming In The 1800s Essay

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “The years 1783-1830 were characterized by expansion westwards and the ‘first beginnings of the application of science’. During the period from 1830 to 1860 most of the epoch-making inventions in agriculture machinery were brought into use and resulted in a complete transformation in the character of the industry’ from 1860 to 1887 the industry capitalized on this newly established commercial base with ‘such an expansion of agricultural enterprise as the world had never seen before and may never see again” (Weiss,…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    Jullian Von Barbier Professor Evans English Composition 10/25/15 History: From Past to Progress Without historical advances in food or exploration, your life would not be as it is today. These faculties have drastically improved each and every one of our lives and will continue to do so as long as these pillars of civilization are kept erect. Sources that take issue with these topics include Kincaid’s “The Ugly Tourist,” and Diamond’s “The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race.”…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Food production is based upon the agricultural industry, which is the foundation of civilization ("Background on Agricultural Practices and Food Technologies", 2017). The quality of life did not necessarily increase as anemia and other diseases, which plague modern poor populations, did not occur among hunter-gatherers. This lifestyle protected these mobile groups against various parasites (Cohen, n.d.). In consequence, the modern diet introduced through food production and in some cases sedimentary lifestyle, increased the chances of diseases. Food production is linked to permanent settlements becoming more numerous.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The parting of the Paleolithic and Neolithic Ages shows a significant split in the lives and principles of prehistoric people. Many aspects of the normal, routine life were improved in order to satisfy a progressive standard of living. The Agricultural Revolution greatly impacted numerous aspects including the economy, culture, and technology. Overall, regardless of their variances and drawbacks, the Paleolithic and Neolithic Ages led to new technologies which ultimately permitted the formation of the civilizations and societies today.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After many thousands of years, the Industrial Revolution moved humanity into an age of mass production in food, tools, goods, and more. Though conventional farming and agriculture no longer can compete with industrial agriculture…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics