Moral Agency Theory

Great Essays
If we are to finally confront the problem of global poverty, who should we expect to act?
Because of the enormity of the task of constructing even a minimally just world, it seems reasonable to suppose that one of the requirements for the designation of moral agents in international politics is that of clarity and therefore parsimony. To avoid confusion and establish real responsibility, we should, if possible, locate moral agents of last resort to whom we can point decisively and expect to act. I will argue below that with the help of insights agent-structure theorists in social and international theory, we can meet this requirement by producing a general definition of moral agency. This is then tested against various proposals for agents
…show more content…
We can—and have tried to—answer this question a number of ways. The most prominent method has been to work backwards from our preferred policy result, to specify the entities most likely or most able to bring about this result. It is natural that our political preferences guide our prescription of who should carry out those preferences: to think a given inequity should be righted is nearly always to have in mind an agent who ought to make this redress. But notice that reasoning this way gives an implicit answer to what agent-structure theorists think of as a fairly technical question. When we work backwards from our political preferences, we tend to rely on some combination of two concepts of agency: we look for entities that are either able to bring about the change we anticipate, or who we feel are responsible for doing so. Defining moral agency as the capacity to act on a given question is perhaps the most common and casual usage. On this view, possession of moral agency is no more delicate than having the ability to take morally-relevant action: moral agents are those who could act to rectify moral deficiencies in the world, whether or not these actors are able to acknowledge the purchase of normative claims on …show more content…
The affinity between rational Kantian persons and contractarian theory is a clear one: it is to achieve these persons that Rawls took the step of specifying the original position as he did: shorn of particular attachments, we can begin to develop political judgments for the right reasons. Confronting this step has been a primary line of attack against the Rawlsian theory, from thinkers who see this assumption as unrealistic and undesirable. This line of thinking has been used to try to justify ethical partiality toward the citizens of one’s own community, most notably by the intellectual descendents of Alastair MacIntyre. By arguing that membership in a community is required for the development of moral intuition and judgment, MacIntyre is able to construct an alternative type of moral person more embedded in the world around her. However, in subsequent writings, MacIntyre has argued that while social embeddedness might initially produce a certain type of moral functioning, it may subsequently impair proper reasoning: these are what he calls, in an eponymous article, ‘social structures and their threats to moral agency.’ In this case, moral agency is the ability to transcend the social structures that helped instantiate a certain moral framework in ourselves. Exercising this ability—to ask what morally-relevant information is being obscured by

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 4 of James Rachels and Stuart Rachels book, The Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors examine the philosophical question whether morality depends on religion. They noted that in popular thinking, morality and religion are inseparable and that people generally accept that morality can be understood only in the framework of religion. On the other hand, from the perspective of the atheist or non religious people, the world is full of evil and in total chaos. Furthermore, the concept behind an all loving God and the ultimate rule maker of the moral code depicts the theory of Divine Command. The Divine Command Theory postulates that the question of what is morally right is commanded by God, and morally wrong is forbidden by God and draws a conclusion that the objectivity problem in ethics seems to be solved.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Week Two Written Responses Ethics: Approaching Moral Decisions According to Holmes the source of human rights is the scriptures in the Bible. There are many scriptures that show these human rights, and God also displays them by the way He treats everyone in the same manner throughout the Bible. As Christians we were born with human rights and Holmes explains this by stating, "Endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights" (Holmes, 1984, p. 89).…

    • 1300 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    II. Kennett, “Autism, Empathy and Moral Agency” Kennett claims that psychopaths are amoral most likely due to their lack of empathy which is also an impairment in individuals with autism. However, it does not seem to be the case that autistic individuals are also amoral. Kennett claims that “an examination of moral thinking in high-functioning autistic people supports a Kantian rather than Humean account of moral agency.”…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Strawson's Argument

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Often humans hold the notion that they have complete free will and choice over their actions. Unfortunately, this is a lie, perpetrated by a feeling of choice. In actuality, all choices every single person makes are predetermined by their upbringing and personal attributes and virtues. It is this notion that Strawson deems “The Basic Argument.” Strawson not only argues that humans do not have free will, but also that they have no moral responsibility.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Michael Shermer’s book The Moral Arc: How Science Makes Us better people, one of the first topics that is introduced to the reader is the one of the oldest arguments in history, Nature vs Nurture. In his book, Shermer proposes the theory that we are all born into this world with some sort of moral compass. Therefore, we all have basic knowledge of what is right and what is wrong. However, the degree to how wrong or right someone views something to be can be shaped by how they are nurtured. Shermer states that the levels of guilt that we feel for violating certain social obligations can and will vary depending on the environment that we are raised in.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The business ethics perspective analyzes business ethics problems as a conflict between the prima facie duty of profitability and some other prima facie duty of corporate citizenship. This analysis identifies the profitability issue and the corporate citizenship issue, considers all relevant deliberation data, then arrives at a conclusion concerning the actual duty in this case. Marketing ethics is a major issue in the business. The product and promotion of the marketing 4Ps are the major concern for business ethics. It is very important the product should be beneficial to customers and fulfill their needs and wants.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Moral Competence Paper

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The goal of my research was to use KMDD and to measure the impact on moral competence. I noticed that KMDD is interesting way how to develop moral competence and how to teach at all. I did seven sessions of KMDD in research group and three sessions in control groups. KMDD itself was for the students a good motivation. Their focus and engagement were tremendously high.…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Moral Outcome The army states in ADRP 1-0 "The Army" that, “The Army ethic is the evolving set of laws, values and beliefs, deeply embedded within the core of the profession’s culture and practiced by its members to motivate and guide the conduct of individual members bound together in common moral purpose.” There is an intense issue with this as the Army struggles to meet the bedrock requirements of a profession, chiefly that using the words evolving and deeply embedded in the same definition are at odds. We as a profession, have failed to state what our core beliefs and creeds are and in provide direction as to where we are drawing this drawing this ethic from.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people have justifications for why they do certain things. Some justifications are based off of happiness, desires, god or morals. People who use happiness and desires as their justification use theories of the good. While those who use god and morals use theories of morality. Some theories that fall into the theories of morality are the divine command theory, consequentialism, and social contract theory.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Key Claims for Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands; Self-awareness of an action being morally incorrect reflects a reason why the person should commit it. Awareness creates justification for following through. (pp 64) The moral politician is considered someone that would be conscious of his bad actions, rather than believing all his actions are good. (pp 65) Rules function as a method to not only motivate people to act the best they possibly can, but to showcase what type of person that are if they do end up breaking them (i.e. feeling guilt or nothing at all).…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    When John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice emerged into the realm of political philosophy in 1971, it not only breathed life into modern-day liberalism but it also inspired the rise of sharp criticism, as philosophy often is wont to do, from different political morals. Included in that mo-saic of contrasting views is modern-day communitarianism. Drawing primarily upon the insights from renowned philosophers Aristotle and Hegel, communitarians place a greater emphasis on the role of the community in defining and shaping individuals. Classical liberalism, on the other hand, depicts communities as emanating from the acts of pre-community individuals. Such is the basis for Rawls’ original position.…

    • 2086 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history there has been continuous debate on whether emotional processes motivate moral judgements in individuals. Empirical research suggests that the experience of emotions, specifically disgust, have prominent influences in moral reasoning and judgement (Ivan, 2015; Olatunji, Puncochar, & Cox, 2016; Schnall, Haidt, Clore & Jordan, 2008). Disgust, defined as “a strong feeling of disapproval or dislike, or a feeling of becoming ill caused by something unpleasant”, can be ultimately governed by an individual’s likes and dislikes (Cambridge English Dictionary, 2017). Psychologists throughout history have supported the ideology that human behaviour is governed by personal likes and dislikes, but precisely how an individual acquires their preferences continues to be the subject of rigorous debate (Hofmann, De Houwer, Perugini, Baeyens & Crombez, 2010). Literature suggests that most likes and dislikes are individually learnt rather than innate, and that the underlying processes behind the development of likes and dislikes can be closely contrasted with Pavlov’s (1927) Classical Conditioning (De Houwer, Thomas & Baeyens, 2001).…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Based on the combination of response in which stage of moral development would Kohlberg most likely place these students? Kohlberg would most likely place these high school students at the convention level in the social authority stage because this stage goes from childhood to adolescence. These high school students are at the point where they are complying with rules or laws and social norms. From the reading, one teacher states that teacher needs to have firm policies and be on board to enforce the rules of the school, so the students don’t have behaviors issue at school.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Judgement Essay

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moral judgement is a process which defines what is wrong, right, ethical, unethical, moral, or immoral. Moral judgement can also be defined as an expression of preference, opinion, will and command of individuals (383). Tom Regan and Mary Midgley both discuss the importance of moral theory and their different ways one can or can’t answer moral questions. Tom Regan focuses on the relativism point of view by expressing four different ways on how not to answer moral questions. Moral relativism depends on culture, legality, religion, and historical symbolism.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays