The Integration Of Psychology And Theology Analysis

Improved Essays
In the book The Integration of Psychology and Theology, Carter and Narramore present several aspects and issues regarding the integration of Psychology and Theology. The main focus of the book revolves around four different models of integration. The four models are; the against model, the of model, the parallels model, and the integrates model. The first chapter of the book focuses on people’s thoughts and perceptions on the idea of integrating psychology and theology. One of the main points discussed in this chapter was how Christians view the integration of these two disciplines. The said that Christians are often hesitant to use psychology, because they fear that if they turn to psychology for help, then they are saying that the …show more content…
According to Carter and Narramore, there cannot be a truly integrative model, from a secular view, as they do not believe in theology. However, the sacred view can be integrative. The integrates model from a sacred perspective, is very extensive in the integration of psychology and theology. This view, holds that God is the author of all truth. However, this model, believes, that revelation and reason are both important in discovering the truth. Therefore, they believe that you truly can integrate psychology and theology, because both of these disciplines hold truth. While, they do believe that psychology does hold truth, the integrates model, does not accept all aspects of psychology, as some theories and ideas, contradict aspect of Scripture and theology. Therefore, the integrates model, does view psychology from a theological lens. Meaning, that they view all parts of psychology as it coincides with the truths in the Bible. Out of the models, this is the model that truly takes all aspects of both, and critically analyzes both, because they do believe that both contain …show more content…
One part of the book that I found intriguing was the chapter on the barriers of integration. I found that as I was reading it, that I disagreed with a lot of the barriers, especially the ones that the Christian’s had against psychology. One barrier, that I had a strong disagreement with, was the Christian’s rejects of the psychologies naturalistic explanations. Why I disagreed with this, is because if we look at scientific data, we see that a lot of the explanations for behaviors in psychology are accurate. If something has been proven to be a naturalistic explanation then I will agree. I do believe that some things have a spiritual explanation but many things can be a naturalistic explanation as

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Jones’ integration view has a heavy respect for both theology and psychology. It believes the two should be related somehow because they actually inform each other. The integration view suggests individuals to learn everything they can about both fields, but the ultimate Lordship is to become a devoted follower of Christ. When science seems to be inconsistent or misaligned with the Bible, the integration view will question the facts within science. This approach believes in drawing the foundation from Scripture and applying it into the search for ultimate answers.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    It becomes difficut to discover and prove facts, so many studies turn into hypothetical observations. The use of pyschotherapy is very unstable as well. Methods vary from patient to patient which causes inconsistency. Bob and Gretchen Passantino, in their article, Psychology and the Church, compare the compatibility of psychotheraoy and bibclical counseling. The similirity between their goals tends to attract Christians to use forms of psychotherapy.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To start, this dilemma of looking to religious teachings as a moral guide is important because many people look to a god to guide them morally, while others do not believe in any god. However, religion is still a large part of philosophy. The strongest argument in favor of this view is, as stated by Shafer-Landau, the Divine Command Theory, which holds that “acts are right just because God commands them” (Shafer-Landau 2). In standard form, the argument would look like this: P1: Acts commanded by God are morally right, and those not commanded are morally wrong. P2: God’s commands are in the Bible and other religious texts/teachings.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Entwistle Summary Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity: An Introduction to Worldview Issues, Philosophical Foundations, and Models of Integration is a book by David Entwistle who analyzes in four sections the integration of Christianity and psychology. In this book, I have been challenged by the idea that Christianity and psychology are at odds and cannot exist being integrated with each other. This rather a controversial point that it can be really impossible for psychology and theology to co-exist being in the same area may be explained by the origin of both: theology is based on faith and psychology is based on truth. In addition, psychology uses an empirical system during the study together with specific methods that may…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peacekeeping Doctrine

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    And yet, the science of theology is systematic, using the entire Bible as is its primary source. It is systematic and it is culturally relevant, “treating timeless issues” though modern culture and concepts.” Theology itself is the science of God and therefore the science of our Christian faith. The aim science is to engage in the intellectual study of a subject, in the case of theology, God. The key to proper intellectual study is that we study the One and Only God through the lens of our own faith. Without that lens of Truth, we are not studying God.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This way of thinking can be denoted has a confirmation bias because they accept, seek out, and remember things that support their view. They also interpret things in a way that support their views. Since God is invisible, people tend to attribute their own moral beliefs to God, rather than try to change what they think is right or wrong according to some objective judgement about what God thinks. Since they cannot directly know what God is thinking, this unfortunately leads to the confirmation bias where the substitute their beliefs for that of God and think their beliefs are…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Karl Barth believed that the task was impossible stating “As theologians, we ought to speak of God. But we are humans and as such cannot speak of God. We ought to do both… precisely in this way give God the glory” (Barth 2011 p.177) mostly because humans being created by God cannot fully understand him. However, he believed that to not speak about him is not the answer either. By admitting to the inability to speak about God would in return give Him all the glory in what theologians would be able to say about him.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rationalism In Religion

    • 2796 Words
    • 12 Pages

    This does not seem like it would work, however they take from the “strong rationalists” the idea that there should be some evidence to help support what it is they believe, but that this does not go so far as to be 100 percent proof in their belief system. The “critical rationalist” take the opposite of “fideism” and say that it should be rational to argue and search religious beliefs. Is it rational to keep believing in a religious faith even when your peers are looking at the same evidence and finding a different answer? This can be rational when you are a “critical rationalist.” People around the world do not, or cannot have the time and or intelligence to fully understand and grapple…

    • 2796 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That one needs evidence to prove that something exists and a lack of evidence against God not existing doesn’t prove that God does exist. According to this view God doesn’t exist and Dawkins proves it with logic. In sum then, the issue is whether his argument is valid or not valid. My own view is that Dawkins’ arguments that God doesn’t exist are strong, they have direct premises that back up his conclusion. Although some might object that God does exist based on their own beliefs through religion, I would reply that Dawkins provides a strong argument against God existence through his examples.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many scholars and believers, like St. Thomas Aquinas, refused the Divine Command Theory for this reason but still believe in God and His instructions. They still believe in God because they are able, and willing, to associate their ethics with religion from a different perspective (Rachels p. 56). In conclusion, the Divine Command Theory is very important in Philosophy and Ethics. Even though the different parts of it contribute to its difficulty to fully comprehend, it is a necessary topic to study. It is also important to learn about the Euthypro Problem that accompanies the theory because, without the problem, the person would not know why the theory leads to the conclusion that morality is not associated with the will of God.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays