Although Jeffrey Wigand played a part in both conflicting rights and resolving conflicts, he chose to decide leaving Brown and Williamson. He also thought it would be best for his family as well. After Jeffrey Wigand was dismissed from his job he endured unethical acts that brought fear to his family. As a result, his family was being watch, their privacy was being invaded, and his wife decided to divorce him. Brown and Williams was unethical in the decision to wrongfully fire Jeffrey Wigand. Unlike Brown and Williams, this film proved to their customers that the operation of cost-benefit analysis was deeply rooted. The company was selfish to maximize the net benefit without thinking about their customers. Brown and Williams’ morals have sometimes been observed as pure
Although Jeffrey Wigand played a part in both conflicting rights and resolving conflicts, he chose to decide leaving Brown and Williamson. He also thought it would be best for his family as well. After Jeffrey Wigand was dismissed from his job he endured unethical acts that brought fear to his family. As a result, his family was being watch, their privacy was being invaded, and his wife decided to divorce him. Brown and Williams was unethical in the decision to wrongfully fire Jeffrey Wigand. Unlike Brown and Williams, this film proved to their customers that the operation of cost-benefit analysis was deeply rooted. The company was selfish to maximize the net benefit without thinking about their customers. Brown and Williams’ morals have sometimes been observed as pure