However, as the book illustrates, emerging research and anecdotal evidence indicates that the conditions of supermax confinement have become increasingly punitive, strict and similar to traditional non-civil approaches to punishment. I would argue that punitive sanctions have historically been a widespread feature of the criminal justice system. Then, the question is ‘what is new?” Unfortunately, Kupers’ concentrated on punitiveness detracts our need for the development of progressive realist account of contemporary crime control or crime prevention. Social policies or reforms cannot focus on popular punitiveness or the alternative, rehabilitation, without finding or exploring a balance between the politics, presentation, actuality, and fear of crime. Thus, social workers’ contributions to this discussion should remain critical. While acknowledging the actualities within Kupers’ perspective, social work’s criticism of solitary confinement must expose America’s lack of preventive …show more content…
Even if a person is mentally stable, any time served in prison will increase his or her vulnerability to the development of mental illness. Also, policies and practices have turned our prisons into revolving-door treatment (or in many cases, non-treatment) facilities, and those that provide therapeutic remain short-terms, under-resourced and ineffective. To me, this signifies that social workers have critical roles to play in all aspects of correctional policy and operations, from entry to release, from creating smart and safe alternatives to monitoring prison practice and advocating and implementing preventive methods. Social work’s involvement should remain as complex as the criminal system, but never as closed and