Essay about The Insanity Plea By Julie E. Grachek And Joseph Goldstein

1300 Words Oct 18th, 2016 6 Pages
Combining the Past and a Plan The insanity plea is like trying to hold water in a fish net. Attempting to apply boundaries to something as intangible as the concept of insanity is bound to spark controversy. Challenging, yet necessary, the application of how laws should affect the mentally ill is an unavoidable issue that needs to be confronted head on. Two experts in their fields, Julie E. Grachek and Joseph Goldstein, share their opinion on the insanity plea in each of their law journal articles. Ms. Grachek writes her scholarly essay as a law student at the University of Indiana in the fall of 2006. Her article does not provide a clear diagnosis on what the issue is with the insanity plea, yet she excels when explaining her well formulated plan to correct it. On another note, Mr. Goldstein adds a totally different value to the ongoing conversation. Aging like a fine wine, “Abolish the Insanity Defence – Why Not” is an article that dates back to 1963. Goldstein’s article adds a unique historical perspective that should make one think twice on how they should approach this issue. Overall, Goldstein and Grachek’s scholarly essays complement each other as sources for the insanity plea because they add a historical past and a plan for the future. The concept of the insanity defense dates back to ancient Greek and Roman times, yet was more officially constructed in 1843 with the creation of the M’Naghten rules. The M’Naghten rules originated in Britain as the product of a…

Related Documents