The Influence Of Western Culture And Indian Culture

Good Essays
Additionally, it is has been made clear that the Western Culture and the Indian culture are not single and unified entities because there so many divisions found in the nations class, religion and racial facets of society. This notion can be best explained by Samuel Huntington in his ‘Clash of Civilizations” in his statement that “At the one hand, the West is at a peak of power. At the same time, however, and perhaps as a result, a return to the roots phenomenon is occurring among non-Western civilizations” (Huntington, 1996, p.26). This can first be understand by being aware of how complex of a nation India truly is when analyzing its multiple divisions embedded throughout its culture. There is an abundant amount of variety in many aspects …show more content…
The Western world is a term referring to different nations depending on the context the understanding of the Western world is placed under. There is no inherently agreed upon definition about what Western nations all have in common. This is because the influence of Westernization can be found in an array of societies all around the global world, it would be evidently impossible to analyze what they all share in common with one another. Western culture is known as the world’s leader when it comes to the various political literary and scientific principles that set it apart from other civilizations. Also, the understanding of the west as a culture that is a single unified can be further understood by the infiltration of western culture that has been strongly marked by European immigration or settlement, such as the Americas. It is evident that many countries around the world are in some regard influenced by the Western cultural superpower because of its economic stability, powerful military, and social diverse society. This is another reasons how Western culture has become so globally influential. Therefore, the notion of Western Culture will never mean a single nation as the cause and/or effect of westernization because of the diverse and broad nature of …show more content…
This means that the public knowledge and awareness needs to be placed on being cognisant of the fact that what a particular countries world view is, will not evidently be what another countries world view is. It is apparent that there is an awareness that there are many different facets and divisions in a national cultural society that can affect its social structure and ability to influence many of the words different cultures. There can never be a single country that maintain international dominance and supremacy of world order. This is because we as human in this anthropological world crave the attention of others and more importantly, the influence of other cultural societies. One can understand the necessity of cultures to thrive on the basis of being reliant on other cultures because of our social capacity of global interconnectedness. Even if a country wanted to remain a single unified nation, it could not remain prosperous for a very long time because its economy and social well- being would slowly diminish. This can be understood in terms of a countries reliance on the cultural tendencies of other nations in terms of their trading patterns. We as a global economic world are heavily reliant on the products that are

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Each corner of the world is not only the destination, but also the origin of the spread of cultures. Under the promotion of westerners, milktea becomes popular among Hong Kongers. This trend can be considered as both Westernisation and Globalisation. But if Hong Kongers’ habit of producing Hong Kong-style milk tea with a sackcloth bag is spread to Western world, it is considered as globalisation, but certainly not Westernisation, let alone…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The international economy has eroded the national borders and barriers of economic activities, and the progress of transnational corporations continue to progress. “International trade remains important, but the key factor is now said to be investment flows by TNCs. These flows are said to be so mobile that national barriers can be effectively ignored…” (Schelling 47). Global economy, transportation and communication to third world countries have become so easily put into practice, that new production across borders and the expansion of transnational companies created the industrialized countries of South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, and many more. Without globalization, economies and their success would be completely different.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    So rather than diminishing or suppressing nationalism, globalization has actually highlighted the stark contrasts between peoples of different ethnic groups across the world and strengthened cultural identities. Middle Eastern social relations are so unique that they often foster an all out assault on globalization and the idea of the world become a more integrated society. The basic tenets of Middle Eastern social relations are such that it is impossible to create an inclusive society in the Middle East because of the "deep culture" that has been instilled in people since the Bedouin tribes(Salzman 24). The tenets of their social culture include to always trust your kin and regard the state as an enemy(Salzman 27). Conflicts that occur within the Middle East then will not be overcome by globalization.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Due to this Huntington claims that we need multiculturalism in order to compete with other civilizations without out diversifying the United States and west it can create conflict with other powerful civilizations. Again I must agree with Huntington. A multicultural civilization will make for a thriving society. He says that the western civilization creating conflict with other civilization can be the greatest threat to world peace, and an international order. Huntingtons book was an interesting read his ideas of civilization although I was unable to talk about all of it mostly revolves around the western civilization what I got from his writing was that he felt without the west world would not be as developed as it had.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Instead they should all strive to recognise that there isn’t one single form of living. There are merits to all forms of living, and these beliefs around how one should live are constantly being modified and changed; culture isn’t static. Beliefs one holds today will not necessarily be the beliefs that one holds in the future. Brett Bowden, makes the distinction that the conundrum surrounding nationalism and cosmopolitanism is mainly due to the way we think as humans (p. 246). It is not difficult to have live in a society with multiple cultures, and be under the same form of government.…

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In fact, in Huntington and other Western analysts and politicians’ perspective, the conflict between Western civilization and political Islam is not only real, but also fundamental (Azghandi, 2009, p. 29). This clash may be seen from the two angles: firstly, how the West dominates and portrays Muslims as uncivilized, barbaric people, but at the same time how the Muslims themselves do not want any changes that (they believe) have something to do with the Western culture. Orientalism. The West has produced a discourse representing the world as dichotomy of the ‘West’ versus the ‘Rest’. Some discursive strategies resulted in the stereotyping process…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Anglo-Saxon Culture

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Bonds that have not been developed on their own and are not found in established will not withstand a confrontation with an outside force. This is a key concern for many about the long term sustainability of multicultural societies. Nationalism has been the main organizing sociopolitical concept in the West, which has led to the West having many powerful modern states. The concept of nationalism has very slowly spread across the globe, but it has not always been readily transplanted. The quickly built new “national” states outside of the European continent were often dominated by a single clan or religious sect who takes away the genuine “national "cohesion.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This branch does not work to cooperate with the other branches to take over the United States and gain complete control of everyone inside the country. The anti federalists see the federal government as one that agree with each other and that will simply pass any law that they wish in order to make them richer and stronger, but in reality only truly necessary laws would be allowed to pass. They forget what happened back in the late 1700s when states and their governments power were greatly uneven. The states that could offer more economically would inevitably have more power leaving other states weak. The federal government helped fix this problem by creating a Union that helped every state.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Easterly’s book is driven by the thesis that democracy will lead to development, not the other way around (Easterly Chapter 1). However, in this writer’s view, Dave Roodman has a point to make. Western leaders in the twenty-first century have to take many Third World countries as they are which does mean that sometimes policy decisions have to be made with dictatorial and unethical heads of state. These leaders can be difficult to work with and it is hard for many Western countries to accept the fact that in order to help the development of a country, they might have to sit across the table from a leader who constantly executes his own people. This is the most pragmatic response.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Orientalism

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Even if there were very few that would do that, it is not as massive as the westerns orientalists. Also, Eastrens orientalists (if one can call them by the term “orientalists”) will never have the authority or the power that the westerns have when exploring the “orient. ” Additionally, for the very few Eastrens “orientalists”, they do not call the western countries as “orient.” Instead, they just call it by its official name (The U.S or France for example). These facts can give the idea that Westerns in general have an authority and power over the “orient.” Europeans originally invented Orientalism, and it represents a huge corporate institution of people that speak and write about the “orient” without any permission given and sometimes not even true facts about the…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays