The Nuclear Strategy and National Style concluded that ‘US conduct in WWII, had the virtue of pursuing the unambiguous, attainable, popular and necessary goal of victory’. The goal of war for the USA was total victory, and this outweighed traditional attitude of anti-bombing. It is argued by Nitze that ‘Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped.’ However, as Bernstein agrees, the evidence used did not correlate with the USSBS survey and the statement is counterfactual and untrue. The atomic bomb, as a secretive weapon, caused the Japanese to surrender just on ‘shock value’ alone. As Truman summarized; ‘we shall completely destroy Japan's power to make war.’ Therefore, dropping the atomic bomb is justified when considering the USA’s traditional realist policy of total victory. Utilizing the bomb proved to be the best decision for an America striving for
The Nuclear Strategy and National Style concluded that ‘US conduct in WWII, had the virtue of pursuing the unambiguous, attainable, popular and necessary goal of victory’. The goal of war for the USA was total victory, and this outweighed traditional attitude of anti-bombing. It is argued by Nitze that ‘Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped.’ However, as Bernstein agrees, the evidence used did not correlate with the USSBS survey and the statement is counterfactual and untrue. The atomic bomb, as a secretive weapon, caused the Japanese to surrender just on ‘shock value’ alone. As Truman summarized; ‘we shall completely destroy Japan's power to make war.’ Therefore, dropping the atomic bomb is justified when considering the USA’s traditional realist policy of total victory. Utilizing the bomb proved to be the best decision for an America striving for