The Influence Of Kissinger's Attack On Pearl Harbor

Improved Essays
The completion of the atomic bomb is not enough to justify the use of it. However, it is the circumstance and context of America’s foreign policy that justify the USA’s use of nuclear warfare. The attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941 was a significant threat to the United States, causing over 2,300 US casualties. It is undeniable that the surprise attack was an instant threat to their considered global dominance, domestic stability and entrenched ideology and nationalism. Pearl Harbor exacerbated the threat of the Axis; leading the USA to adopt an even stricter defensive realist foreign policy. The policy of Containment now defined America’s foreign relations, dictating action and relationships. Containment ensured that America’s main interest was America. …show more content…
The Nuclear Strategy and National Style concluded that ‘US conduct in WWII, had the virtue of pursuing the unambiguous, attainable, popular and necessary goal of victory’. The goal of war for the USA was total victory, and this outweighed traditional attitude of anti-bombing. It is argued by Nitze that ‘Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped.’ However, as Bernstein agrees, the evidence used did not correlate with the USSBS survey and the statement is counterfactual and untrue. The atomic bomb, as a secretive weapon, caused the Japanese to surrender just on ‘shock value’ alone. As Truman summarized; ‘we shall completely destroy Japan's power to make war.’ Therefore, dropping the atomic bomb is justified when considering the USA’s traditional realist policy of total victory. Utilizing the bomb proved to be the best decision for an America striving for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Prompt & Utter Destruction is a book by J. Samuel Walker that details the events leading up the decision for the United States to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. Narrative-like descriptions of cabinet meetings, personal diary entries of important players, and first-hand accounts from soldiers in the war are all artfully pieced together to recreate the story of Truman’s decision, overturning many common misconceptions about the era and presenting new information. While Walker presents his own conclusions using the data he has compiled, he is careful to leave room for the reader to make his/her own inferences with the same data, and admits there are plenty of gaps in his information that could potentially…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Truman Hasty Decision Dbq

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From order of President Truman, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, thus ending World War Two. President Truman’s hasty decision is not one to be honorable. This choice by the president was made with ignorance, lack of empathy, and lack of critical thinking. The bombing is unjustified due to Japan’s inevitable surrender, the amount of civilian casualties, and alternative opportunities to the bombing.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    due to its large military, “The total strength of the Japanese Army was estimated at 5,000,000 men… the major fighting would not end until the latter part of 1946, at the earliest” (Document #3). The size of Japan’s military and the estimated prolonging of the war provided the U.S. with an uncertainty that they would not have liked to accept. To eradicate this uncertainty and provide a rapid end to the war, the U.S. took the opportunity at hand and launched both atomic bombs. In the end, this decision proved triumphant as they evaded a lengthy battle with Japan and ended the long, treacherous…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Prompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs against Japan” by J. Samuel Walker, the author analysis the issues from both sides of the debate of weather the atomic bombs were a justifiable means of military force to end World War II. On August 6th, 1945, Japan received a devastating blow unseen by anyone in history. Hiroshima received complete annihilation of an area of about 4.4 square miles (74). Three days later on August 9th, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, destroying everything in roughly a 3000-foot radius from ground zero (77). The debate continues still about the use of atomic bombs in ending World War II and forcing an unconditional surrender by Japan.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the Dropping the atomic bomb was the only correct decision for the United States because of casualties being less than what they would have if America had invaded, the brutality of Japanese towards the American POW, and the importance of intimidating Stalin. By dropping the Atomic bomb, the United States rightfully saved thousands of potential lives. After the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the amount of Japanese lives lost totaled to 105,000. (Doc E)…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the United States decided against using the atomic bomb, U.S. soldiers would have invaded Japanese islands. This operation was named Operation Downfall, and this invasion would have led to thousands of casualties. Japan was willing the literally fight to the death and President Truman knew that if we didn’t use the atomic bomb that the United States would continue to fight as long as Japan was still standing. An ironic justification for dropping the bomb is not only did it save American lives, but it also saved Japanese lives. It was predicted that if Operation Downfall took place that anywhere from 5 to 10 million Japanese casualties would have occurred.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Truman’s choice to drop the bomb on Japan was justified since it helped in ending the war rapidly. Truman made the right call, to drop the atomic bomb, in order to end the war, gain back the economy, to show who is the strongest nation, and to have less blood being spilled. Likewise, it is developed that dropping the atomic bomb has offered Japan to stop engaging the war. Japan surrenders and agrees that they won 't have the ability to fight another war after the end of World War II. Some Japanese pioneers agreed that the assaulting fundamentally pounded Japan 's vitality to continue with the war.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As the Japanese already established their willingness to fight tooth and nail for Japan and the battles of Iwo Jima and Okinawa suggesting a substantial amount of loss of life and property for an invasion of Japan homeland. The atomic bombs were possibly the only alterative to what an invasion would hold, as author Bernstein defines with America’s potential Invasion of Japan on the horizon, Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson, details an estimation of over 250,000 American casualties and up to a million men for an invasion of Japan (Bernstein, 550). With America’s estimations and the expected outcomes of invasion of Japan, suggesting a bloodbath “an all-out fight to the death” between the Japanese population and American soldiers, The atomic bombs had to be dropped, as not dropping the atomic bombs the invasion of Japan would have most likely preceded instead, thus prolonging the war, causing substantial amounts of casualties and costing a great amount of funds and resources to overtsee the operation. The atomic bombs provided an alternative to risking anymore American lives. Similarly, by July 1945, the Japanese military continued refuse surrender.…

    • 2113 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Viewpoint 30A “The United States Should Not Drop the Atomic Bomb on Japan.” The Franck Committee, 1945. Dropping a nuclear bomb on Japan would initiate grim political and economic problems in the future of the United States. Without international control of nuclear weapons, a nuclear armaments race is ensured. The Franck Committee states, “...A race for nuclear armaments is certain to ensue following the first revelation of our possession of nuclear weapons to the world” (239).…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    " On the other hand, the United States’ decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was a military measure to ensure that Japan would fully surrender. In Document H titled, Radio Address, Harry S Truman, President Truman stated, “We have used it in order to shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans.” He stated that the U.S had used the atomic bombs to end the war quickly and to save more American lives. However, as said by General HH Arnold, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” This meant that even if the bombs weren’t used, then Japan still would have…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United State’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan during World War ll is one of the most arguable controversies in American history due to the questionable reasoning behind its use, and the horrific effects it had on Japanese citizens. At the time of the bombing it was actually supported by a vast majority of the American public. During 1945, the decision to use the bomb was not only supported but encouraged. In August of 1945 opinion polls given to the American public showed 85% of Americans supported bombing Japan (Hadley, 21). On the contrary, historians such as Gar Alperovitz have argued Truman used the bomb merely to gain political status and power over the Soviets.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The use of the Atomic Bomb was both necessary and justified as it immediately ended World War II, solidified the United States as a superpower, and contained the germinating powers of Japan and Russia. The use of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately ended World War II and stopped the continuation of catastrophic and widespread violence in Japan. The Japanese had an audacious outlook on their offense throughout the duration of the war. It was suggested by Admiral William E. Leahy that, “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender”(Source 2).…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bombing in Japan In August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, causing major destruction and life threatening issues, over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Everyone has their own take on what really happened and have their own perspective on controversies regarding the United States’ decision to drop the bombs. Perspectives that I will be discussing today are from three disciplines: scientific view (Leo Szilard), journalism view (Wilfred Bruchett), and historical view (a writer of an article called “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” and Bernard Feld’s article “Lessons from Hiroshima and Nagasaki”). Each have their own unique approach on the atomic bomb and it’s affects.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Bomb During the summer of 1945, things were looking pretty grim for Imperial Japan, as they were the last axis power left and had been under constant firebombing for the United States, President Truman chose to drop two atomic bombs, one on Hiroshima on August 6th and one on Nagasaki on August 9th. Since before either of the two bombs had been dropped, it has been debated whether or not it was the right decision. Truman stated that the bombs were dropped to save American lives, but many argue over the government’s other motives at the time. Many bring up valid points over why the bomb should not have been dropped and that the government public justification for dropping the bomb was based off of false information, but ultimately the motivation behind dropping the bomb, hidden by the government or not, outweighs the reasons for not dropping the bomb.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Was it Necessary to Drop the Atomic Bomb to End World War II?” The United States of America was and still is one of the biggest countries in the world when it comes to power and demand. Developing such a weapon as the Atomic bomb that can scare and destroy anyone and anything, was in United States favor. But was it really necessary to use a weapon this powerful and dangerous? Yes, I think so. This essay is about my and the two professors Robert James Maddox and Tsuyoshi Hasegawa point of view; if it was necessary to drop the Atomic bombs to end the war.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays