Indian Removal Act Andrew Jackson

Improved Essays
Most everyone has heard or learned about the Indian removal act and probably wondered how that was made and why it wasn 't vetoed or ruled unconstitutional. The Indian removal act was a law that was passed that allowed the president to make treaties with the native americans and try to offer them money and land somewhere else for there land. Andrew jackson got a lot of the tribes to sign the treaties but the ones that did not were pushed out by force anyway. This led to the Trail of tears which was when Andrew Jackson pushed out all of the Cherokee Nation with force and caused over 4000 native americans to lose their lives. The checks and balances system did not work as planned during this time the government was controlled by one party and …show more content…
The senate consisted of 25 Jacksonians and 23 anti-jacksonians, the house of representatives consisted of 136 jacksonians and 72 anti-jacksonians. The jacksonian party was a democrat party and andrew jackson was a democrat. Andrew Jackson also appointed 6 supreme court judges making the supreme court in his favor.”Together, these six justices transformed the Supreme Court”(john). When all of the branches of government are controlled by one political party it 's way easy for one branch to have more power over the others. In this case it was the executive branch calling all the shots and getting whatever they wanted as soon as they …show more content…
Nowhere in this act did it say that the natives would be forced by gunpoint to leave so the executive branch did a bad job and going threw with the law and should have been checked or had the bill vetoed.”In the fall of 1838, the U.S. government, now under Van Buren, ordered the forcible removal of the Cherokees from Georgia to the Indian Territory in present-day Oklahoma”(Aboukhadijeh). The government should have not forced the cherokees out of their home because they had no business to ask them to sign the treaty of ecoata in the first place.
With all this information you know know about the indian removal act and how corrupt the government was at this time. The checks and balances were used vary poorly during this time and did not work. The supreme court did not rule the indian removal act unconstitutional. Andrew jackson ignored the verdict of the worcester vs georgia case and no branch of government even attempted to check that. as a result of this corrupted checks and balances system over 2000 native americans were killed on the trail of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Indian Removal Act Dbq

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In the Indian Removal the Indians were pushed out of their territory and pushed to new territory. The policy made the Indians live longer making them rich and wealthy with new and extensive territory. The Indian Removal act did its purpose and didn’t end with annihilation from war. The United States benefited the Indians, “The United States will play to send the natives to a land where they may live longer and possibly survive as a people”(Doc A). The act was a benefit to both sides.…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Indian removal movement of 1830 started because Americans were moving west and acquiring land to settle, but the Indians became the obstacle. Another factor that made the Americans to remove the Cherokees was, because of the gold that Georgians had found in Cherokee’s land. The government would make treaties, but the government would not fully follow the treaties. While the Americans moved west, they introduced diseases, but this was not enough to wipe out the tribes, war was the answer. It was not until Congress passed the Indian Removal Act of 1830 that it allowed to move Indians further west that became a real problem for the tribes.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indian Removal Act In 1828 Andrew Jackson had own presidency and had succeed by changing things with the government. One of many was him having a special relationship with the common people. He removed about 10 percent of workers and replaced with loyal friends and followers. In the 1800’s Native Americans had been living next to white neighbors, taking on their culture.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Constitution empowers Congress to regulate commerce with forging nations, and several States, and Indians tribes. In the negotiation between the Indians and the government, the Indians acknowledge themselves sovereign nation.as under the protection of the United States government and no other Jackson recommended Congress to adopt the Removal Act of 1830. That act gave the President the authority to give up land in west Mississippi River to Indians that would give up their land to the government. The Law allowed the Indians material and financial assistance to get to their new location. Jackson's government succeeded in general terms.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some may regard Indian Removal Policy as a moral and benevolent action. However, it was not benevolent. The U.S. dishonored treaties and they just hated the Indians by showing serious authority to do whatever they wanted to Indians. As I say one more time, Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Policy was not benevolent at all, I think. It was reasonable and understandable that this policy was a period of expansion to the westward, but he overlooked a supreme court and took responsibility by relocating a lot of Native Americans are not justifiable.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indian Removal: Is it justified? The Act of Removal of the Cherokee Indians was a rough era in history. The Removal of the Indians happened because the citizens of Georgia wanted to mine on their land. The Cherokee Indians had refused to let them mine on their land because the land belonged to the legally and they were not going to let some strangers come and take their land away from them. How would you like it if someone came into your house and told you to leave?…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jackson listened to them and created the Indian Removal Act. He presented it to congress and they debated it. Eventually they approved of it and Jackson enforced it. Jackson thought this would be the best way to preserve their cultures and keep peace among the Americans and the Indians. In 1832 he was reelected.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The only way to truly understand someone is when you have gone through what this person has gone through. In Custer Died for Your Sins, Vine Deloria Jr. says “Anyone and everyone who knows an Indian or who is interested, immediately and thoroughly understands them.” White people believed that Indians are so easy to read and so understandable, meanwhile they have no idea what difficulties and struggles they went through. The Indians got stereotyped for being something that isn’t true and their beliefs were mistaken for something else. Another issue presented was the unfair treatment of the government policies against the Indians.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Indian Removal Act, which was passed by Congress in 1830, completely changed the path for the future in multiple aspects. In determining what impact this event still has on our country today, one must start by analyzing the relationships between Native Americans, the United States government, and the common white settler. Additionally, one must analyze how the removal of these tribes affected not only them, but the white settlers. Socially, Native Americans were viewed as no more than objects in the way of what the Americans viewed as rightfully theirs.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It forced the Native Indians to surrender millions of acres of land and to move to west. Throughout the removal many Indians suffered through sickness and death. The Indian Removal Act not only removed the Indians from their rightful lands forcefully but also is responsible for over 4000 deaths of the Native Americans, that today is known as the ‘Trail of Tears’. Bibliography Calloway, Colin G. Kill the Indian and Save the Man 1870s-1920s. (In Bedford/St. Martin’s (Ed.), First Peoples: A Documentary Survey of American Indian History, 4th ed., 2012) 412-483.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Trail Of Tears Essay

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    History is an important part of education because when it is taught, it is less likely to happen again. If only the good parts of history were taught, then people would wonder what happened. It may not be the most exciting or fun event to learn about, but it is relevant and transfers knowledge and wisdom so that the less exciting parts of history aren’t repeated. The Trail of Tears is one of many tragic times in history. In the 1830s, the southeastern portion of the united states, Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, North Carolina and Florida, was populated with over 100,000 Native Americans, but by the end of the decade, very few were left.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people were caught up on the Indian Removal Act, mainly the Trail of Tears. In Feller’s article, he does mention it and says it actually happened during Martin Van Buren’s presidency even though Jackson’s law led to it (Feller). The Indian Removal Act allowed the president to negotiate with the southern tribes, asking for their land in exchange for them to move west of the Mississippi River (Wikipedia). Supposedly, it was voluntary; although, in a roundabout way, the Indians would want to if they wanted to survive.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Things that lead up to the Indian removal act being passed was the greed of white settlers who kept moving onto Indian lands. They believed the Indians were in their way and pressured the federal government for Indian land. All five tribes showed resistance, but the Cherokee tried doing it the peaceful way. Their leader John Ross took their case to the Supreme Court. Chief John Marshall appealed to the Cherokee in March of 1832 and said “The law of the Georgians can have no force”.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The natives land was constantly being settled on, their livestock stolen, even their villages burned to the ground by the European American Settlers. By signing with the Indian Removal Act, the indigenous peoples were given an opportunity to get away from the violence and discrimination of the settlers. The Indian Removal Act gave the Native Americans a means of survival, thus benefitting the Native Americans and saving many lives that may have been lost on both the European American and the Native American sides had the Native Americans remained on their homeland.            The Native American Tribes were offered land west of the Mississippi River that they would have total sovereignty over. President Andrew Jackson was given the legal right by the Indian Removal Policy to grant the land west of the Mississippi River to the Native Americans for them alone to govern over to the tribes that did agree to give up their ancestral homelands. Most of the European American population believed that America would never expand beyond the Mississippi River, so the Native American Tribes would be safe from the settlers heading west to create their homes on the new…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On May 28, 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act. The law authorized Andrew Jackson to negotiate with Indians for their removal to federal land west of the Mississippi River in exchange for their homelands. Andrew Jackson was able to convince the American people that Indians could not coexist peacefully with them. He argued that the Indians were uncivilized and needed to be guarded from their own savage ways. As a result of his actions, thousands of Indians were forcibly ripped from their homes and onto a journey to a unknown territory, that was not as fertile as their home grounds.…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays