Allen1
Raven Allen
Arnetra Pleas
ENG 1123
16/06/17
The inconceivable treatment of animal testing Behind the scene
Introduction:
There are hundreds of million of animal each year being subjected to excruciating agonizing pain from the cosmetic and scientific testing. Animal are treated so poorly in the cosmetic and scientific field. The realization is that cosmetic and scientific field show an inhuman look on creature that are not human. They use animal to check the safety of product, develop medical ,determine toxicity of substance. The horrific picture of animal being mistreated and horrendous would make anybody pity these poor animals. Animals testing is morally wrong because of the horrendous and mistreated of our animal brethren. …show more content…
Alternative methods are being discovered everyday. Animal testing are being substitute in department like toxicity testing,and drug development. The difficult part is seeing that animal test is not necessary in getting the result need to make sure the experiment is a success. Cell culture has been a major substitute foe animal testing. The thing is that cell culture may work for one experiment, but may not necessarily work for another. That why we continue to look for more and more method to replace the old one in animal testing. To keep animal from being tested on,private companies and government should technology ,public opinion,and look into alternative methods for testing there experiment for the need of the …show more content…
There has several new treated that said can replace animal testing. The scientific studies is a complex thing. If the best way to get result need ,is to us-+e an animal. I get it,but if you can get the same or better result from an alternative method that not involve with the excruciating treatment of animal . Why not do that. A skin allergy test on guinea pigs only predicted accurate 72% in cases,but with a fusion of chemistry and cell -base alternative method the accurate out come increases to inconceivable 90% in cases. A quality test showed if a particular drug,and chemical would affect the baby of a pregnant rats. It only detected about 60% percent of dangerous substance. While a cell-base alternative, has a 100% accurate rate at detecting dangerous substance. These method as all been proven to be an success on the given
Raven Allen
Arnetra Pleas
ENG 1123
16/06/17
The inconceivable treatment of animal testing Behind the scene
Introduction:
There are hundreds of million of animal each year being subjected to excruciating agonizing pain from the cosmetic and scientific testing. Animal are treated so poorly in the cosmetic and scientific field. The realization is that cosmetic and scientific field show an inhuman look on creature that are not human. They use animal to check the safety of product, develop medical ,determine toxicity of substance. The horrific picture of animal being mistreated and horrendous would make anybody pity these poor animals. Animals testing is morally wrong because of the horrendous and mistreated of our animal brethren. …show more content…
Alternative methods are being discovered everyday. Animal testing are being substitute in department like toxicity testing,and drug development. The difficult part is seeing that animal test is not necessary in getting the result need to make sure the experiment is a success. Cell culture has been a major substitute foe animal testing. The thing is that cell culture may work for one experiment, but may not necessarily work for another. That why we continue to look for more and more method to replace the old one in animal testing. To keep animal from being tested on,private companies and government should technology ,public opinion,and look into alternative methods for testing there experiment for the need of the …show more content…
There has several new treated that said can replace animal testing. The scientific studies is a complex thing. If the best way to get result need ,is to us-+e an animal. I get it,but if you can get the same or better result from an alternative method that not involve with the excruciating treatment of animal . Why not do that. A skin allergy test on guinea pigs only predicted accurate 72% in cases,but with a fusion of chemistry and cell -base alternative method the accurate out come increases to inconceivable 90% in cases. A quality test showed if a particular drug,and chemical would affect the baby of a pregnant rats. It only detected about 60% percent of dangerous substance. While a cell-base alternative, has a 100% accurate rate at detecting dangerous substance. These method as all been proven to be an success on the given