Disenfranchisement Of Felons

Improved Essays
Voting is considered one of the most important civic duties that a citizen may participate in. Initially, only wealthy white land owners could vote in this country, but as time passed more groups were granted the right to vote. Now, there is increasing debate as to whether convicted felons should be allowed the right to vote both during and after their sentencing. Many states have laws that prohibit this, but they have proved only to be detrimental to American democracy. Therefore, it is time for these states to repeal their disenfranchisement laws in the name of human rights and liberty. Voting is a right that every U.S. citizen enjoys when they finally turn 18. A fundamental process of our government, “voting is the cornerstone of a democracy” …show more content…
In fact, the practice has “been around since ancient Greece and Rome” (“Felon Voting Rights”). However, over time the penalties for the convicted have been reduced. In the case of the United States, it actually stems from post-Civil War racial discrimination (“Voting for People with Felony Convictions”). In an effort to prevent African-Americans from voting, many states started to deny prisoners the right to vote. Today, there are only “two states [that] allow felons to vote from prison” while there are some that “permanently ban felons from voting even after being released from prison, parole, and probation, and having paid all their fines” (“State Felon Voting Laws”). It can vary widely from each state as to how much felon voting is restricted. A recent statistic estimates that “more than five million American citizens are now denied the right to vote,” which happens to include “13% of the African-American population, because of felony convictions” (“Voting for People with Felony Convictions”). With an already massive incarceration rate, the amount of people who are getting denied (or at least challenged) the right to vote is higher than ever. However, there are calls to restore voting rights to felons, and in some states action is being …show more content…
Recently, there has been a “significant national momentum towards restoring voting rights to people with criminal convictions” (“Restoring the Right to Vote by State”). This momentum has hit some state legislatures around the country. In the 12 years between 1996 and 2008, “28 states passed new laws on felon voting rights,” which included “seven [that] repealed lifetime disenfranchisement laws” (“Felon Voting Rights”). The latter is a significant step for felon voting rights, but there are still some states that continue life disenfranchisement. Kentucky for example, is known to ban felons from voting for life, which includes “an estimated 7.4 percent of voting-age Kentuckians” (Kenning). However, there is a possibility for a felon to regain their voting rights in Kentucky: “felons with completed sentences, probation and parole can petition the governor for the right to vote, but it 's a process reform advocates say is not uniform” (Kenning). While it is possible, it is not easy for most felons. Positive change has been made in the restoration of felon voting rights, but is something that will progress slowly and require significant lobbying effort in state

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    As soon as a minority obtains a criminal record, suddenly a vast amount of legalized scapegoating besieges them. They can now legally be disenfranchised, denied housing, and quality education. Disenfranchisement of African Americans is a huge problem. In fact, today more African American males are disenfranchised than in the 1870’s. This is mainly to do with felon disenfranchisement laws that deny felons the right to vote. People who are felons are disproportionately people of color. Research has shown that as much as 10% of the population in some minority communities in the United States are unable to vote as a result of felony disenfranchisement. The criminal justice system has been able to arrest significantly more African Americans and deny them the right to vote as part of the War on Drugs. This is inherently racist and has in turn expanded the powers of the system in a negative way.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Given these points felons right to vote is a written law and is against the law if it is written in the constitution the state is not allowing ex-felons having the right to vote is considered unlawful. Getting right to vote restored is one of the ways ex-felons can use to get back in the working society and starting a new after being incarcerated for a long period of time, for them it could be a joyous event or a stepping stone in their…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Felons To Vote

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Thesis: Felons should have ability to vote because they have served their time, they did not lose their rights, and they are still involved in society and the racism card tends to be pulled.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Felon disenfranchisement has been in practice for centuries, dating back to colonial times (Carter 45). It has been a very controversial topic that is still debated today due to morals and legal understandings. President Jimmy Carter defined disenfranchisement as denying a person the right to vote. Therefore, felon disenfranchisement refers to depriving felons their right to vote, at least temporarily (Carter 45). The United States Constitution and its interpretation has been a key aspect that is considered in determining one’s opinion on felons’ voting rights. Since our nation’s Constitution outlines rights that citizens are entitled to, some argue that voting restrictions imposed on convicted felons deprive them of these Constitutional rights and consider this unequal treatment. Others argue that the status of being a convicted felon legally justifies unequal treatment and the right to vote should only be given to law-abiding citizens. The reinstatement of voting rights should not be automatically granted, rather the felon’s individual rights should be restored only after approval of his application to his state’s…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Latino Americans

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. Felony disenfranchisement laws: which were enacted at the end of the Civil War, these laws basically exclude convicted felons from voting. Consequently, “a study of 10 states concluded that "Latinos have a disproportionately higher rate of disenfranchisement compared to their presence in the voting population (Morin, p.2).…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Felon disenfranchisement has been around over 100 years and had shown just how having the right of voting taken away from you can impact the country profoundly. Felons who have served their time should be allowed to vote by federal law, not matter what state they reside in. It is said under the constitution that once you have been convicted of a felony you lose your right to vote, this law however was created to keep african americans from voting back in the late 1800s. The United States in not the same country it was 100 years ago, we have evolved and matured to the point where it is acceptable to let them vote once they have served their time. Forbidding fellow Americans of the right to vote, has impacted this country in more way than people realize, and prohibits millions of Americans in saying who they want their next president to be…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Voting Rights In Kentucky

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nationally, the drive to restore the right to vote to former convicts has gained bipartisan support as a way to promote the re-entry of prisoners to society, and as a way to reduce the disproportionate toll on potential black voters, a result of higher criminal conviction rates for African-Americans.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If someone has already broken the law in some form, it shows that they cannot take care of themselves in the correct way or form without breaking the law, therefore they should lose the right to vote completely while serving their the correct punishment. It is mostly common sense that if someone breaks the law, they prove that they incapable of making independent decisions, like voting. Their mind is more than likely occupied with doing something that breaks the law, so in all probability they are not focused on any kind election that they could be voting for. In conclusion, if someone has already broken the law to the point of major punishment, they should lose the right to vote while they complete their term. D. Citation/website…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history there have been many laws restricting certain people from voting. Almost all of these laws have been abolished, however, the laws restricting felons from voting are still in place in most locations. Felons should have their voting rights restored to them after being reintegrated into society for a period of time…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to do the most good for the most people, equal rights must be afforded to every one. The most unacceptable form of injustice is disenfranchisement, and my specific area of interest is felon disenfranchisement. I think it’s of the utmost importance that we address this, and address it soon. Each state has varying laws regarding the legality of felon voting; from states that allow felons to vote while incarcerated, on parole, and probation to states that permanently take away a citizen’s right to vote, depending on the severity of the crime. Currently, two states allow felons to vote while in jail or serving a part of their sentence, parole, probation, etc. Those states are Maine and Vermont, where felons vote by absentee ballot if incarcerated, and by…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Felon Disenfranchisement is the removing of a felon’s civil liberties while incarcerated and even past their prison sentence (Nation Conference of state Legislatures, 2016). Consequently, felon disenfranchisement could be seen as a very retributive punishment for felons. Individual states determine which rights are removed and may include: voting rights, eligibility for financial aid, the right to bear arms, the right to hold a jury, and other fundamental American rights. (Hammack, 2009). Many of these rights that are taken away are essential to the American way of life. Arguments lay on both ends of the spectrum. Both sides have valid cases in the way they present each other. Among the more controversial…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Imagine a felony that has just served their time after they refused to pay taxes. His sentence was five years. It was November and the presidential candidates were getting ready to be voted for. Should this felon be allowed to vote? Felons should be allowed to vote after they serve their time because they have natural rights, the government lets them do other things, and they just deserve a second chance.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the constitution the Fourteenth Amendment grants to the states the authority to deny voting rights to anyone that has a criminal conviction. On paper this does seem to be pretty valid, if you break the law, things that at one time you were entitled to are now no longer allowed. If a murderer has been allowed to vote for a client, who may benefit the perpetrator, it is a safe bet that the victim’s family would be outraged. There was one incident in Israel, where the assassin of the late Yitzak Rabin was allowed to vote, which alarmed the former Prime Minister’s wife. There are two points in regards to why convicted felons should vote:…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, these limitations implemented on felons can be traced back to the democratic foundation of America as women, poor, African Americans and felons were stripped of voting rights (McLaughlin, huffingtonpost.com) which still continues for felons today due to the strict enforcement of laws. Many Americans consider this to be a negative impact within the democracy as the exclusion of felons from political involvement brings about racial discrimination within the society (Sidlow and Henschen 171). Limitations on voting has led to the presence of racial discrimination as African Americans who are felons are on the top of the hierarchy in comparison to the rest of the population (Sidlow and Henschen 171). Due to which there is an imbalance within the voting system as a significant amount of individuals are being underrepresented within the democratic process. Furthermore, due to felon disfranchisement and the idea of racial discrimination, questions are being raised regarding who goes to the prison in United States based on its high incarceration rates nationwide (Greenhouse, nytimes.com). Disfranchisement not only impedes citizens of different races from voting but also, deprives other citizens of political rights involving suffrage. For example, excluding the poor or the people within minority groups from expressing their point of views regarding political affairs this leads to bias within the voting system (Sidlow and Henschen 171). As, not every individual is represented equally defeating the true purpose of a democracy, because the current situation is defined to be “patently unfair” (Sidlow and Henschen 171). In fact, many citizens or the federal courts within the United States would not approve of any restrictions enforced on rights mentioned within the First Amendment as they are classified to be the fundamental…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2000, Florida created a voting purge list. On this list, fifty eight thousand convicted felons names were barred from voting in the election. Florida resident and former navy veteran Willie Steen had been wrongfully mistaken for a convict with a similar name and thus, rejected from the polls. Steen wasn’t the only one who was wrongfully put on this list, many others would be banned from the voting polls as well. This list contained a large amount of errors. “Blacks made up only fifteen percent of registered voters in the state, but forty four percent of those on the purge list, which turned out to be littered with errors.” (327). Reading this, it could seem as this was just an innocent error, however, it may not have been. Wallace McDonald was also on this list. In the 1950’s, he was charged for falling asleep waiting for public bus. For his punishment, he was to work on a municipal garbage truck. However, he walked off the job and was charged thirty dollars. When he found his name of the list, he hired a lawyer to prove he was not a felon. Even when proved that McDonald was not a felon, he could not get reinstated onto the voter rolls. Floredia Walker, whom was required to maintain current background checks, was also wrongfully on the list. What was interesting was that these people had very little in common except:…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays