In today’s time it is a people have the freewill to express themselves based on their own personal values, no matter how colorful or offensive it is. The reason for this case is because it’s a first amendment right to express your beliefs, in spite of this there are some cultural expectations that limits people to express themselves in certain ways. For example, when someone spray paint on a federal public building the person can be place under arrest, even though they are expressing how they feel. In the same manner, when it comes to allowing transgender individuals to use restrooms that doesn’t accommodate to the other sex, it plays a problem for those who feel their privacy is being violated. A problem that could occur is the federal government
…show more content…
"Bathroom Bias: Making the Case for Trans Rights Under Disability law” by Daniella Schmidt said how the “civil rights movements face more severe, pressing problems than bathroom access is misguided in multiple ways” (Schmidt 161). In contrast, someone who has no choice in the matter on who they are or the physical disability they possess has no impact on whether or not they decide to go into the opposite sex restroom. During the Civil Rights era, people that wasn’t physically born of Caucasian decent were denied in certain areas that was no near as an equal to facilities that have a much better quality. To add to it, the “courts see bathroom access as a "sex" issue and not a "gender" issue” meaning you are determined a male or female based on the physical genital from the time you are born. (Schmidt 167) Therefore areas that do comes with gender neutral restrooms should be the logical exception for those that have them or the restrooms that accommodate to their natural …show more content…
The idea of the federal government getting involved with is problem due to the fact that the states has more of an idea about the funding of the schools. Finally, a problem that can occur is that some schools wouldn’t be able to afford to lose their funding, causing a negative impact toward these institutions. Finally, when it comes to certain groups there has to be a line that determines what considers you a male or female, when reality someone being born from a different ethnicity or being gay determines whom they naturally
"Bathroom Bias: Making the Case for Trans Rights Under Disability law” by Daniella Schmidt said how the “civil rights movements face more severe, pressing problems than bathroom access is misguided in multiple ways” (Schmidt 161). In contrast, someone who has no choice in the matter on who they are or the physical disability they possess has no impact on whether or not they decide to go into the opposite sex restroom. During the Civil Rights era, people that wasn’t physically born of Caucasian decent were denied in certain areas that was no near as an equal to facilities that have a much better quality. To add to it, the “courts see bathroom access as a "sex" issue and not a "gender" issue” meaning you are determined a male or female based on the physical genital from the time you are born. (Schmidt 167) Therefore areas that do comes with gender neutral restrooms should be the logical exception for those that have them or the restrooms that accommodate to their natural …show more content…
The idea of the federal government getting involved with is problem due to the fact that the states has more of an idea about the funding of the schools. Finally, a problem that can occur is that some schools wouldn’t be able to afford to lose their funding, causing a negative impact toward these institutions. Finally, when it comes to certain groups there has to be a line that determines what considers you a male or female, when reality someone being born from a different ethnicity or being gay determines whom they naturally