Developers make games the way see them and if that involves violence then they are going to add violence to try and make the game better. If the government decides that the game is too violent and restricts its sale then that will make the developer feel cheated. They put in a lot of time and effort to make their games an enjoyable experience for people who play them. If one consumer feels that the game is too violent then they have the choice to buy it or not. However, another consumer may not be bothered by the content and will buy it anyway. Video games have different effects on different people so the decision as to whether a game is right for them should be up to them and not the government. If the government ever tries to restrict the sale of video games they will have to do it in a way that does not involve freedom of expression. Most likely a tragic event will have to happen for the government to have a reasonable cause to start regulating video games (Regulation violates First
Developers make games the way see them and if that involves violence then they are going to add violence to try and make the game better. If the government decides that the game is too violent and restricts its sale then that will make the developer feel cheated. They put in a lot of time and effort to make their games an enjoyable experience for people who play them. If one consumer feels that the game is too violent then they have the choice to buy it or not. However, another consumer may not be bothered by the content and will buy it anyway. Video games have different effects on different people so the decision as to whether a game is right for them should be up to them and not the government. If the government ever tries to restrict the sale of video games they will have to do it in a way that does not involve freedom of expression. Most likely a tragic event will have to happen for the government to have a reasonable cause to start regulating video games (Regulation violates First