Thoreau's Argument Against The Government

Better Essays
Albert Einstein once said, “Never do anything against the conscience even if the state demands it”. This is meaning that individuality should be overruled by the government. Whether it be religion, morals, or just against the conscience, people should never be forced to do things against their wishes. Henry David Thoreau also agrees with Albert Einstein. He believes that the less the government interacts and directly affects the people the better. “But, just speak practically and as a citizen, unlike those who call themselves no-government men, ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government” (Thoreau). The government cannot possibly represent each individual within their every belief; therefore, all individuals …show more content…
The first circumstance that it is appropriate to go against the government is if the government is being over controlling. The United States government is a democracy. A democracy means that the country is run as a whole population. Therefor, the entire American population should have a say in what happens in their country. This is why the people vote who they deem fit to make life impacting decisions about the country. "The government itself, which is only the mode which people have chosen to execute their will, is equally liable to be abused and perverted before the people can ask through it” (Thoreau). If the candidates that the people voted for change their views or were pretending to have certain viewpoints on different matters, then the people have every right to go against the government. The government overall, as a whole is only a small percentage of the population; furthermore, what they say that they will stand for should not be able to change once …show more content…
Also, it is appropriate to go against the government if done so peacefully. Back in the day, equality was something that was not typically found. Throughout the world, quality is not the same. Whether it be about ethnicity, religion, or gender the government should not be able to endorse any form of prejudice. If the government is endorsing any form of mistreatment or any quality than the people have every right to go against their government. Almost everyone knows debatably one of the most iconic peaceful protest demonstrated by Rosa parks. It was on that day that Rosa Parks became a strong symbol for equal rights and on how peaceful tactics are effective. Rosa Parks was an average African American woman who paid her normal bus toll to get home after a tiresome day at work. A white male had also paid the bus toll and Rosa Parks was told to stand and give up her seat for this man. Rosa Parks simply refused and the police had to come to arrest her. This peaceful miniature protest of hers is what sparked a national debate. Based off of the actions taken against Rosa Parks, the black community refused to ride buses so it would damage the buses business and demand for further equality peacefully. The colored wanted more equality and felt mistreated because of all the racism and hardships that they were put through on a daily basis. Martin Luther King Junior

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The government won’t be the best it can be until it starts to appreciate their power source, the people. The most important thing to remember is that the government will stop overpowering the people once the people can prove they can handle life peacefully and respectfully without the government. When people start to act kindly to one another and handle bad situations calmly, there will be no need for a government. If we can be fair and smart about things, the government will become useless and will back off. The government will never go away, but having a laid back government is much better than having a government that doesn’t allow you to do what you want to do or support what you believe in.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Therefore, even if Hobbes hoped for a more submissive constituent that only questions government in result to a direct threat of life, this cannot be the case in our current political time. There is no homogenous group in one society, therefore a ruler cannot truly make one decision that appeases all, they can, however, make decisions that help some and hurt others. This is when Hobbes theory on ownership for self-preservation becomes flawed. Although his way of thought has informed many governments it has also done what he hoped it wouldn’t; provide an unsafe environment that directly threatens lives. Proving that ownership cannot guarantee a free society it is only a quick resolution to a mountain of overlying issues that may possibly go…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The last thing that this country needs is for the people to resent our government because of punishments linked to compulsory voting. America has always been the land of the free and a country with limited restriction on the people. That is why compulsory voting is not in the United States best interest. It is important that the people do not become dissatisfied with the government over voting. There should not be mandatory voting in America because it would take away some of the people’s freedom, would not force uneducated or ignorant people to vote, and it would be difficult to establish punishment for those who did not…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The opinions and beliefs of an individual should not be obstructed or it can be detrimental to the society. One voice should not represent an entire state because that leads to negative society. For a society to prosper, there must be a balance between powers. In Antigone by Sophocles, Haimon states,”It is no city if it takes order from one voice,”…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hayek believes in little to no government interference in an individual’s life. Hayek argues strongly against coercion and does not even believe in the use of coercion to prevent greater coercion. Coercion cannot be prevented completely, however, in Hayek’s view it should be as limited as possible. Planned economies are a huge form of coercion, and an example Hayek explains in-depth. The individual in this system has no liberty to the extent that they are dependent on the state.…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    On the other hand, if a law is unacceptable in the first place then why should a person have to follow it, however short a time? The will of the people should not be repressed. Albert Einstein once said, “Never do anything against conscience even if the state demands it.” I think that Thoreau, Parks, and Lovejoy would all…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The international community is characterized as an anarchy- no world government ruling. Nation states seek for power and security because this ideology of “self-help” exists; in a world where you cannot trust anyone and where your friends today can be your enemy tomorrow states do not want to be interdependent. Since many states want to be independent and be viewed as a strong…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    How Did John Locke Rebel

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hobbes believed that people had no right to be rebellious. Thomas Hobbes is correct, people should not rebel even if the government violates individual rights because it could lead to a destruction of a society. People are not bad nor are they good. People are cruel, greedy, and selfish. Not all humans believe or think about the same thoughts.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He argues that a large factor contributing to the failure of the movement was the type of activism used. The countercultural approach enacted by the activists for the movement was unable to create change in part because politicians do not have to listen to protestors. There is no requirement for public officials to create change in response to protestors or focus groups. George W. Bush said on June 8, 2001 that, “We can accomplish things on behalf of the American people. Instead of kind of worrying about your own standing or focusing on a focus group, taking a poll to figure out what to believe in.” While the purpose of the message was to tell officials that they should not form their beliefs around what focus groups in their district say, it also demonstrates the fact that public officials do not have to act based on what the people say, but rather what they believe should be done.…

    • 2187 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The only things a person knows under the veil of ignorance is that they are there to decide the principles of justice should govern their state and basic concepts of politics and human nature. This original position is where Rawls would like a person to imagine themselves in. Since they know nothing about the individual they are, they cannot have any prejudice against another. This is important because it gets rid of the self-interest conflict of a state contract. No person in the original position is going to approve of laws that allow one party to take advantage of another party because they might be the one that gets taken advantage of.…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays