There were details that were the same, but there were also details that were not. The police officers wanted to have the murder cleared and they wanted that person to be Randall Adams. They asked leading questions and had information out in the public that could be manipulated to fit what the police wanted to hear. David even said the police were coaching the witnesses with leading questions that had details of the case in them. The truth is ambiguous. Nobody knows who was right, but each one believed he knew what the truth was. The need to believe what we want to believe is stronger than the need for the truth. This was shown clearly in the documentary Thin Blue Line. The truth is not always what it seems, and in this case it put Randall Adams, an innocent man, in
There were details that were the same, but there were also details that were not. The police officers wanted to have the murder cleared and they wanted that person to be Randall Adams. They asked leading questions and had information out in the public that could be manipulated to fit what the police wanted to hear. David even said the police were coaching the witnesses with leading questions that had details of the case in them. The truth is ambiguous. Nobody knows who was right, but each one believed he knew what the truth was. The need to believe what we want to believe is stronger than the need for the truth. This was shown clearly in the documentary Thin Blue Line. The truth is not always what it seems, and in this case it put Randall Adams, an innocent man, in