Supreme Court In England

Superior Essays
Article III, Section I of the Constitution states, “The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court.” This excerpt from the Constitution proves the overwhelming authority and control that has been vested by the Constitution to the Supreme Court. Justices appointed to the Supreme Court, “shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour,” or in other words, for life. To have a group of individuals hold such power for the duration of their lives is unprecedented. Supreme Court justices should not be able to uphold duties for lifelong tenures since it will lead to despotic, mentally unable leaders operating under personal political agendas who cannot be removed unless convicted of a high crime as prescribed in the …show more content…
Lifelong tenure will cause justices to become “independent of the people, of the legislature, and of every power under heaven.” Justices need to represent the people, and any absolute power for a lifelong tenure will evolve into a group of oppressive justices. Americans seek to deviate from oppressors, and to deviate from lifelong tenure of Supreme Court justices provides the safest route while safeguarding individual …show more content…
What if the mental capacity of a justice becomes skewed due to old age? The Constitution does not provide any specific clause to address this issue, and it is certainly a problem with regards to lifelong tenure. With the ability in the future to live longer and healthier lives, the probability of a justice’s mental capacity to abscond with age is likely. The image of oppressive justices with personal political agendas and skewed mental capacities who cannot be removed until convicted with high crimes is not one Americans seek for their great

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The political landscape as we know it today has always allowed The President of the United States to select his own Supreme Court judge. However, should the Supreme Court Judge’s beliefs represent the traits or value systems of the President of United States? For example, President George Bush appointed both Clarence Thomas and David Souter, two contrasting personalities say the least. Nonetheless, Clarence Thomas was known for his boldness, committed to seeking out the original meaning of the Constitution, perhaps, similarities to President Bush prosecuted the Gulf War and how he stood behind Thomas controversial confirmation hearings (McGinnis, Flaherty, 1995).…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Robert Franke CRJ 410 12/5/2015 Final Paper Justice Clarence Thomas was born in 1948 in Pin Point, Georgia, which was a mainly black area that was founded by freed slaves after the Civil War. He was the second ever black judge, in the Supreme Court and was at first not thrilled to working as a judge. As Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States his views are typically from a conservative stand point, and usually wants a solution that limits the power of the federal government and expands the power of state and the local governments, interestingly enough he has demonstrated a strong support from a stronger executive branch within the government. His father M.C. Thomas was a farm worker while his mother Leola Williams…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The book is written to address particularly voters to awaken them up with regard to their powers to elect whoever they like to serve in the judicial systems of the Supreme Court (Sutherland & Dobson, 2005). The book exposes a series of admonishing statements to the public on the series of the on-going struggles with outsmarting judiciary. Sutherland writes to spew out his contempt on what he believes is the abuse of power by the Supreme court Judges and points out ways through which this trend can possibly be mitigated. Both the Supreme Court Judges and the Supreme Court nominees alike are deeply engrossed in corruptive deals which the writer seeks to…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judges elected by Republican Presidents in the 70’s and 80’s are still in the Supreme Court. 1970’s-1980’s Republican beliefs still play a part in modern politics. Political agendas play a role when presidents have to appoint a justice because they want a candidate that ten years down the line will make judicial decisions that support their views. That may be slightly off topic, but it demonstrates the power the president has in his hands when electing a justice. However, the power is also in the hands of Congress.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harry L. Carrico Essay

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Harry L. Carrico (September 4, 1916- January 27, 2013) Harry Lee Carrico was known for serving more than 50 years on the Supreme Court of Virginia (Slayton & Schapiro, 2013). Mr. Carrico followed his passion to relentlessly serve others by joining the Supreme Court of Virginia in 1961 (Slayton & Schapiro, 2013). Additionally, Mr. Carrico served 22 years as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia until he was mandatorily required to retire at the age of 86 on January 31, 2003 (Slayton & Schapiro, 2013). Notwithstanding his retirement, Mr. Carrico continued to sporadically hear cases as a Senior Justice and joined the faculty at the University Of Richmond School Of Law in 2004 as a visiting professor of law and civil engagement (Slayton & Schapiro, 2013).…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I contend that as time alters, the Judicial Branch has adapted to be the most powerful because of its…

    • 1832 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard of the phrase “supreme court”? Well, in the judicial branch of the United States government, the phrase is an everyday thing for them. This is because they work in law and, more specifically, the supreme justices of court. Basically, it’s their job to serve up justice. This type of thing, was what Thurgood Marshall ended up doing for a living.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Antifederalist argue the judges of the Supreme Court are a vital part in the judiciary branch controlling the legislative branch and if need be, the Supreme Court could resort to determining what the extent of the powers of Congress are (AF 78). Next to permanency in office, otherwise known as tenure nothing could contribute more to the independence of the judges than their support…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By the middle of the eighteenth century, the United States consisted of thirteen colonies ruled by British government. The northern colonies were founded by people who were religious and believed in strong work ethic whereas the southern colonies were Puritans who settled in New England to gain religious freedom from Britain while the first colonists of the southern colonies were Englishmen. The first settlers of the west were Scots-Irish people who settled in deep-soiled Pennsylvania when the English government placed restrictions on their productions of linens and woolens. In 1607, Englishmen of southern colonies started the first permanent settlement of the United States at Jamestown in order to find gold to become wealthy. The first colonists…

    • 1071 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 29th 2011, Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg visited the Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law. During an interview with Dean John B. Attanasio, she discussed her confirmation process and commented on the different milieu's that candidates have faced when nominated for a seat on the Supreme Court. Ginsburg explained that “[Between] 1993 and 1994, the climate was so different from the way it is today... The vote on me was 93 to 3. Today my ACLU connection would most likely disqualify me.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Tenth Amendment states, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”. * It seems, sometimes, that the Supreme Court is involved in issues where they have no business being, and similarly with the federal government. While their intervention is supposed to be in the name of the freedom of the American people, it acts as an infringement upon that freedom. As it is seen in US Term Limits v Thornton and Arizona State Legislature v Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, when the people consciously consent to laws that have been passed and the way in which they are carried out, it is unnecessary for the Court or the federal…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Supreme Court is supposed to be immune from democracy’s demands; term limits would not help the function of the court if so then politicians who have faced Washington for decades should also be constricted. Limiting the terms of public office is unresponsive to any significant dimension of our politics. (David Harsanvi; 2014)…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    History Of Federal Courts

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The court system in our country was created under the influences from the Justinian Code, after the Roman Emperor Justinian I, Napoleonic Code, and the common law of Great Britain. Federal and States courts have separate political jurisdictions and procedures, nonetheless, both were established to solve conflicts. However, court systems are different than police departments, in that courts are in a hierarchy order. When a case is seen at a court, the loosing party can appeal to court with more power and the results can change from those given by the previous judge. In Federal courts the cases are first presented to the U. S. Magistrate, District, and Appeal Courts.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays