Italian Citizenship

Improved Essays
For some time, one of the hot issues of the day in Rome was citizenship for the Italian allies. While the Romans had previously been fairly liberal in granting different allies full citizenship, lately they had been satisfied to grant only second class, or Latin, citizenship. Unfortunately, the Italian allies were not nearly as satisfied with this and were agitating for full rights. We have already seen how this issue cost Gaius Gracchus his life. When another Roman, Marcus Livius Drusus, proposed full citizenship and was assassinated, Italian frustration boiled over into open rebellion. This revolt, known as the Social War, or war of the allies (9l-88 B.C.E.), saw Rome faced with a formidable Italian enemy trained in Roman tactics. In fact, …show more content…
Sulla 's tremendous energy and drive made short work of his enemies, and he entered Rome in triumph. His first act was to massacre any of his enemies, including some 90 senators and 2600 rich equites. Among those narrowly escaping Sulla 's wrath was the defiant young son-in-law of Marius, Julius Caesar. Sulla then became dictator, and reformed the government to put the Senate back in firm control of the state, just like in the good old days. A year later, Sulla abdicated his powers and retired to the luxury of his villa where he died soon afterwards (78 …show more content…
And after his strong hand was removed, political turmoil returned in full force. The first man to take advantage of this situation was Pompey, one of Sulla 's young army officers. Pompey 's early rise to power was the result of some drive and energy, but also a good deal of luck. He held several military commands before holding public office. That was illegal, but apparently of little account anymore in Rome. Quite a bit of luck accompanied Pompey as he destroyed Marius ' supporters holding out in North Africa and Spain. Also, by chance, as he returned to Rome from Spain, he encountered and mopped up the remnants of a great slave revolt led by a gladiator named Spartacus. Another of Sulla 's former officers, Crassus "Dives" (the rich), had actually broken the back of this slave revolt that had terrorized Italy for two years. Nevertheless, Pompey claimed partial

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Romans definitely granted citizenship to more people, as well as under more lenient conditions than the Athenians did. For example, in Athens, there was only one type of person that was allowed to be a citizen, and that was the native-born and free adult male. As a girl/woman/female, I was quite dumbfounded at the fact that the Athenian civilization only granted citizenship to males because I strongly that believe that women should not be held to a different standard than males. For women are perfectly capable of matching or even exceeding the physical and intellectual ability of men. In the Roman Empire, they allowed free and native-born women to become citizens, but with some limitations. Women were allowed to become property owners, but couldn’t vote or hold public office. Even though there were strict limitations to the citizenship of women, the Roman empire definitely held a more progressive system that was less discriminatory towards the people that didn’t fulfill the circumstances that the paragon of society had set. By actually letting a different type of person gain citizenship, it shows that the Roman system was more modernized and “advanced” than the Athenian…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Roman Citizenship Dbq

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One reason the Rome system of citizenship was better because Rome had citizenship for non-Romans. The evidence of this is in document A, it says that Rome allowed women, children, and a sons of a freed slave can be a citizen. The evidence helps explain why Rome had the stronger system because Rome let everyone be a citizen to become stronger and it was bigger because they can have more people.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The senate contained about 300 men who would serve life long terms, if the census did not prove they were not fit to be in the Senate. The 300 men in the Roman Senate had responsibilities for controlling foreign relations,making treaties,war policy, creating alliances, control of public land,selecting ambassadors and trying cases for treason and conspiracy (Document F painting by: Cesare Maccari). The Roman Republic still managed to set aside rules for those who wanted to be citizens and were foreigners. People such as, Latini's, Foderati's, and Perrini's were foreigners from conquered lands, from foreign lands, but lived in the Italian peninsula, or citizens of states that had a treaty with Rome( Document c by: Claudius and other sources). The Roman republic was not as open or public as the Athenian Democracy. The Senate seat in Rome was passed down and their meeting was more formal than the Athenian…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sulla, the Roman dictator at the time, ordered Caesar to divorce his then wife,Cornelia. Caesar, refusing to complete such a deed, was forced to leave Rome for his and his family’s safety. His absence from Rome lasted from 81 to 78B.C. It was only after Sulla’s death that Caesar was able to start gaining political power.^17(encyclo2013). With the help of Pompey, Caesar was able to start his political career and obtain popularity by reversing Sulla’s ruling of Rome and becoming the advisor for Rome by approximately 69B.C. Caesar was able to climb the political ladder by making the secret alliance, also known as the First Triumvirate, with Pompey and Crassus. In 59B.C, by sealing their deal with the marriage of Pompey and Caesar’s daughter, Caesar was elected consul for Rome the next year. This rise of power allowed Caesar to achieve one of his greatest accomplishments, the takeover of…

    • 1337 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The violence against the Gracchi was caused by the Senate fearing the loss of the Senate 's power in the face of two charismatic and intelligent brothers. Sulla was a powerful force by himself who drew upon the power of his soldier’s rather than the power of the people. This is why Sulla succeeded, where the Gracchi failed. The brothers placed too much of their overall plan for Rome on the belief that the peoples ' support would be sufficient to create a stronger Roman Republic. Sulla took a more violent approach to achieve his goals. He set a dangerous precedent that proved to be the downfall of the Roman Republic. If Sulla could successfully maintain power by committing violence against his own people, then why couldn’t others? This would later inspire Caesar to march on Rome and create his own dictatorship, Cicero wrote that Pompey once said that if “Sulla could do it, why can’t I”. The Gracchi provided a different precedent of sorts. They provided the example that if one were to begin to consolidate power at the alarming rate that Tiberius and Gaius did, one must be have reliable and powerful support. Essentially the Gracchi (representatives of the state/people) had violence committed against them while Sulla committed violence against the state. The main difference between these is that the Gracchi were seeking to improve the lot of the people, while Sulla was focused on himself and consolidating his power over the…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It was composed of Julius Caesar, Pompey and Crassus. This was known as the First Triumvirate. When Crassus was killed, the remaining two members Julius Caesar and Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus fought for control. When Pompey’s wife, Caesar’s daughter, died their relationship became even more unstable, leading to a military conflict between the two. This is known as Caesar’s Civil War. Pompey had allied himself with the Senate, versus Caesar who had the support of the people. Caesar also had the loyalty of his army, which he had fought with at Gaul. Caesar had two choices: He could bow to the Senate, but he would have been politically destroyed, or he could take the rights that the Senate had refused to grant him. The idea of civil war became a reality when Caesar and his army crossed the Rubicon. By crossing the Rubicon River, Caesar had declared war on Rome, defying the Senate. As Caesar uttered the words “Alea iacta est” or “the die is cast”, it marked the point of no return. This helped Caesar regain political influence. This civil war was the battle of the ages, between two powerful generals, each with their own army. Caesar’s military skill outmatched that of Pompey’s, having his army praise him for their success at Gaul, and for their rewards after the War. Pompey had always failed to come through on his promises to his army, lowering their respect for him. Pompey quickly decided to abandon Italy to Caesar…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 458 BCE the city of Rome was under attack from multiple different directions by the Sabines and Aequi armies. The senate assembled two separate armies commanded by Roman consuls Nauticus and Minucius. Nauticus led his army to many great victories, however Minucius did not. Minucius and his men were surrounded by Aequi armies because of Minucius lack of courage to attack when necessary. Five brave soldiers broke through the Aequi blockade to deliver word to Rome and request reinforcements. The senate made an executive decision and elected Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus as dictator. As dictator Cincinnatus had absolute and unchecked power over all aspects of the republic and armies. With this power Cincinnatus went right to work, he shut down all private business in the city, he ordered all men of military age to meet in the towns square at dawn to take on the Aquebi army. Cincinnatus personally raised and army, crushed his enemy two weeks.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Next, all the men attached to Julius Caesar's murder were killed by execution, shipwreck, suicide, or Augustus the first emperor of Rome's army which meant Augustus honored his father and his legacy so he slayed the men who took his father away from him and made it where his father could not live the amazing life he deserved. Finally, Rome was settled back in from Caesar's death because they had a new ruler who would carry out Caesar's legacy, and rule and protect Rome the way it deserved to be protected (Wasson, Plutarch 290-298, and “Julius Caesar Biography”). The senators thought Julius Caesar's ideas endangered the republic which lead to Caesars long lasting horrific death, ultimately leading to Caesar not becoming the first emperor of the Roman Empire. Julius Caesar was a renowned leader whose legacy was cut short in an attempt to make a mark on the world and men, but even though he died his incredible son carried out his legacy for him because like father, like…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The great arrival of Italian immigrants in America was between 1900 and 1910. My grandmother was born in Benevento, Italy and lived there till the age of 29. She lived with her mother, father, brother and sister on a small farm where she would work for her family in the fields. Agricultural workers had few rights and unemployment ran high. Her family was poor and she had little opportunities in Italy. Her older sister met an American man who she soon married and together they left to live in America. My grandmother shortly did the same and got married to an American man who was visiting Italy. My grandfather is also 100% Italian and can speak it fluently. America was the key to a better life similar to many of the individuals in the “roots”…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar was a Roman general and politician. He was born July 13, 100 B.C; his father was a politician and his mother from the plebian class. Caesar rose to political prominence during the revolt of Rome's allies. He was related to Gaius Marius who was the revolt's leader, and he chose to join his faction. In 65 B.C Caesar restored the triumphal monuments of Marius which were a political success on his part. Caesar was also a general and had many victories against the people of Gaul. He also won the civil between him and his rival Pompey who was murdered by the pharaoh Ptolemy. On March 15, 44 B.C he was stabbed to death which led to 13 years of civil war in Rome.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pompey’s conquests sparking Caesar’s alliance with Crassus and eventual military takeover was the cause for a thinned troop force. With growing opposition surrounding them, generals thought that they could keep Rome a military superpower, but they forgot about the problems within the Roman Republic. No longer was the primary focus of a growing republic agricultural development and commerce, but now is military superiority. Revolts could not change the minds of these power hungry generals who even began reducing upper class pay to fill the void of money they had from ambitious militant campaigns. The resulting uprisings did nothing but hurt the unity of the republic even further.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lucius Cornelius Sulla came from a good, but not very wealthy Roman family. He proved his worth during the Social War (91-89 BC). Strangely for a man who himself ignored the senate's wishes and who killed an unprecedented number of its members, he did much to restore its authority. That the Gracchi brothers had stripped away. The damaging conflicts with the Gracchi brothers and their infamous use of other assemblies, the senate was now reaffirmed as the highest body, entitled to veto any decision reached by another assembly. The power held by the Tribunes of the People was virtually abolished, as they now no longer possessed the power to challenge the senate. So, he was basically the counter-attack to what the Gracchi brothers had tried to…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rome citizenship was more to get other than Athens who were very very strict about there’s.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rome held a fate that would be devastating to the city-state following its great conquests. However, to understand the unraveling of the Roman republic, it’s important to understand how Rome obtained the position it had and what ultimately caused the negative effects. To do this an overview of how Rome became the fairest one of all is necessary. This essay will briefly examine how Rome rose to power and through power and greatness lost its upper hand and became torn.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With conquest came wealth and this changed Rome 's economy and government. Among the changes were the replacement of small farms by large estates, the coming of slavery, a movement from farms to cities, and the decline of the Roman republic (smitlifescience). Also, the political violence inside Rome 's government of a power struggle between the politicians had caused the end of the Roman republic and eventually became an imperial government. Previously, Rome despised one ruler and fought wars during the expulsion the kings, seemed to have returned Rome to their old habit after conquering and expanding their territories. As Rome expanded, so was their ego, discarding the incorporation policy and making it’s conquered territories as its subjects rather than granting them citizenship of Rome. Through conquest, Rome’s politicians became greedy for power and stole from Rome’s citizens, who were entitled to a piece of public land, where families could have a better standard of living by farming their land property. Consequently, the rich were getting richer, while the poor were getting nothing. The slaves were better off than the poor Roman citizenships. Most of the jobs were given to the slaves as free labor. Thus, Rome’s economic distressed due to the high unemployment rate and the increasing number of citizens who were homeless. Ultimately,…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays