The Judicial Review Process

Improved Essays
The founding fathers of the Constitution did not want the government to have too much power in any one agency, so they divided the government into the executive, legislative and judicial branch to avoid tyranny. The Supreme Court is the authority of the judicial branch and the highest of all courts, which can examine the laws and decisions made by Congress and declares them unconstitutional. This does not mean that the Supreme Court has unlimited power because each branch partakes in checks and balance in providing a government of the people. The role of the Supreme Court is to not only to ensure the people equal justice under the Constitution but to also provide as checks and balance within the government. Since the Constitution is complex, …show more content…
While judicial review is not noted in the Constitution, Madison had intended the U.S. Constitution to be evaluated by independent judges instead of through conflicting political bargaining. [3] Of course, the Supreme Court’s power of judicial review was not implemented until 1803 in connection with the case Marbury v. Madison. In Marbury v. Madison, John Marshall, the Chief Justice, pointed out that it was necessary for the Supreme Court to have the power to overturn unconstitutional legislation. [4] Ever since, the Supreme Court has used this power to review the laws to make sure they are constitutional. The judicial review process gives the Court the responsibility to ensure individual rights and maintain the Constitution as new issues arise in a complicated and changing society. …show more content…
[8] Of course, this seem to fit the judicial review process by providing the Court the ability to ensure individual rights and maintain the living constitution as new issues arise in changing society. On the other hand, the living constitutional ideal adds that interpreting the meaning of the Constitution under old views is outdated and needs to evolve without being formally amended. [9] The founding fathers were aware of the need for change to fit the needs of society, but to make those changes it must be formally amended and not left up to the judiciary branch to make that decision. This is apparent under U. S. Const. art. V, which provides the option to propose an amendment if two-thirds of the House find it necessary or through the national convention and requested by two-thirds if the state legislature.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States government 's history, one thing remains the same, the three branches of government are as important as each other in keeping the nation thriving. Each with their unique set of strengths and weaknesses, the Judicial Branch is one that comes to mind when thinking of having the most powerful strength, proving a system of checks and balances to the other government branches. The Judicial Branch is responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of the actions of the government, according to Fine & Levin-Waldman (2016). What this means is, when something is signed into law or actions are taken, the Supreme Court of the United States decides if it follows the rights and laws outlined in the US Constitution. According to…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Three Branches

    • 1105 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Even though the President is the one who appoints the members of the Supreme Court, the members of the Supreme Court that the President has chosen must be approved by the Congress. This is how the Check and Balance works with one another and keep every branches at the same level as one another. No branch has more power than one another because they each have some sort of power to keep the others in…

    • 1105 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Its job is to tell when something is unconstitutional, whether it be state laws, governing powers, sometimes even the president themselves (Scholastic). Judicial review is the Supreme Court’s power to review legislative and executive actions, giving them the power to reject laws and decisions of the states. These decisions…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the Supreme Court didn't have the power to overturn unconstitutional federal laws, then who would? Without the supreme court, the other two branches will be overpowering. The United States can’t have a workable system of the government without the judicial branch. The Judicial branch act as a tiebreaker for the legislative branch and executive branch. And those three are the reason to prevent the government from overpower.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marbury v. Madison was a benchmark United States Supreme court case in which the court formed the foundation for the exercise of Judicial review under Article 3 of the US constitution. The landmark decision of this case, defined the boundaries between the Executive and Judicial branches of the US government. Case Summary The case started with the petition filed to the supreme Court on February 11, 1803 by William Marbury. William Marbury had been appointed justice of Peace in the district of Columbia by the president John Adams but whose commission was not later delivered.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. Secondly, the high court protects the civil rights and liberties of the common American by striking down laws that violate the Constitution. The final major role of the Supreme Court is to appropriately monitor our government in such a way that popular majorities may not harm or take advantage of unpopular minorities. For most of our history, the Supreme Court selection process was characterized by its insularity.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, the Supreme Court needs to be able to decided whether laws are constitutional or not, because we need a part of the government to do that specific job. The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution states that the “Constitution, … , shall be the supreme law of the land” (Doc. G), and it is the basis that our government and country were based upon. No law should able to violate the Constitution therefore we need someone to decide what is constitutional and what isn’t. No legislative act or law can go against the Constitution, and if it does it is not a legitimate law (Doc. C).…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Executive Branch contains the President and his Cabinet. The President acts as Head of State, which is the Chief Representative of the United States. The Cabinet is appointed by the President and carries out the duties of the Executive office under the authority of the President. There are multiple government agency’s that the president appoints the heads of, including the CIA, EPA and many more, the President also appoints the head of over 50 independent government agencies.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court is the highest judicial court in the country and the head of the judicial branch. The Supreme Court is responsible for being the final judge in all cases involving Congress and the Constitution and their decisions can have great impact on the country. These decisions or opinions have an important impact on country as they rule on what Congress can or cannot do and how the constitution applies to the country. The decisions of the Supreme Court have a profound impact on the United States and how the country operates. After Supreme Court justices have discussed a case Justices draft opinions that will be used as the final decision about a case.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To a certain extent, the Supreme Courts have very limited power to enforce decisions that they make. With that being said, their most important power is having the authority to interpret the Constitution. The Supreme Court remains the most powerful judicial system in world history. As stated by Unah, Isaac, “There is wide variability in the effectiveness of the Supreme Court” (Unah, 1996). Opinions by the Supreme Court provide information to members of Congress about the types of policies the Court recognizes as legitimate under its preferred readings of the Constitution.…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They use judicial review to determine if a court case’s law or actions contradicted the constitutional. Through the review of all the facts and information in each case as well the decision of that they can tell if that case goes with the constitution or against the constitution. Some may think one case is with the constitution while another case of similar fashion is unconstitutional. That is because the justices have different minds and also have their own opinions of each case that they see. When they have decided that a case is unconstitutional then there will be steps and procedures that will get that case repealed and another decision be made about that case.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The concept of Judicial Review was informed so the Supreme Court of the United States reviews whatever legislative act by the constitution validity. Even though the function of Judicial Review is not a main topic in the constitution, it was conformed before it the constitution was adopted. As there were cases being overturned in state houses, the Supreme Court had to fulfill the rule of the Constitution. Judicial Review confirmed that the people of the country would remain supreme to the legislative. Te Supreme Court was the protectors of the Constitution.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The doctrine of judicial review is an integral part of the American judicial and constitutional process even though it is not mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. In 1803, in the famous case of Marbury v. Madison , the U.S.Supreme Court clearly and specifically claimed that it had the power of judicial review and it would review the constitutionality of the Acts passed by the Congress. The Constitution of Canada or Australia does not contain any express provision for judicial review yet judicial review has been developed as an integral part of the constitutional process. In England as there is no written constitution the courts have resorted to indirect judicial review. Although courts in England cannot declare an Act of Parliament ultra vires,…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In American politics is conducted within the framework of a written constitution which establishes the powers of the different branches of government, as well as many of the fundamental rights and liberties of American citizens. However, since the Constitution is such a brief document that sets out general principles and in most areas is not very specific in what it means. Therefore, its precise meaning in any particular situation is often unclear. As a result, many of the decisions reached about what the Constitution actually means have been reached by judges whose role it is to establish and interpret constitutional law. It is evident that constitutional law requires constitutional interpretation, this has now become the use of the US Supreme Court.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays