Compared to my peers I scored a strong 68, which indicates that I am very sociable, outgoing, energetic, lively. The statement is very accurate with the perception I have of myself I am very outgoing and enjoy new adventures. Next is Agreeableness, which is defined by the differences in concern with cooperation and social harmony. Agreeableness is measured by the qualities of trust, morality, altruism, cooperation, modesty, and sympathy I scored a 22 on agreeableness I don’t agree with this score it says I am less concern with others’ needs than with my own. Personally I tend to help others in need and take on their workload especially with family members and friends. Conscientiousness is concerns with the way we regulate, control, and direct our impulses. On that extreme I scored a 57 on average meaning that I am reasonably reliable, organized, and self-controlled. In general I agree with this because I am a very organized individual I always get things done ahead of time and like to show my reliability to …show more content…
Lastly, Openness to experience is the last factor in the five-factor model that is defined as dimensions of cognitive styles that is distinguishes imaginative, creative people down to earth, and conventional people. Openness to experience is measured by level of imagination, artistic interest, emotionality, adventurousness, intellect, and liberalism. My level of openness to experience is very low I scored a 13 versus my peers indicating that I think relatively in like and simple terms others may describe me as down to earth, practical, and conservative. Personally I don’t agree with this I am very open in trying new things I do believe that experiences are important to being a healthy growing individual. Overall, my view on the five-factor model is that it is relevant and to some extent valid in measuring the characterized traits of personality in the book the five-factor model is emphasized a lot in the consistency of reliability the test itself performance. Although, some theorist agree that this form of self-assessment lacks a full understanding of the qualities of personality in which are needed accurately describe a person’s way of