Electoral College: True Representative Democracy In The United States

Improved Essays
Democracy relies on representative democracy in the ability of the populace to participate in and take part in general elections for the representative leaders of the country. However there are rules in systems in place in a true representative democracy more complicated than it was in the past. Voters today are also faced with a large and increasing number of hot topic issues that require more knowledge than the average voter is likely to know which in turn makes meaningful presence in the election difficult to fully achieve. Campaigns help to ease this massive influx and information and allow the voter the opportunity to know what they’re going to vote for as the political party a politician belongs to indicates their stances on all the …show more content…
The Electoral College utilizes a plurality system to count votes and decide which candidate gets the votes for each state. This presents a problem that even though a candidate may win in the popular vote that may not win the Electoral College as was the case during the 2000 election. When this system prevents the popular vote from being the winner of the election this contrasts in terms of overall majority. The argument that the electoral college hinders true representation is based on the fact that the plurality in each state gets the whole state as far as the ballots go. However the counterargument is that the Electoral College and the first pass the Post System that allow for true representation from each state in the election. This is because each state has a different winner that was chosen by the people of that state or at least the plurality of the people in that state. So it comes down to the Electoral College the true question is does the plurality system allow for better representation? Or does it dilute the votes of the general population? In this instance the plurality system is better than say a full blown majority rules when it comes representing the views of each state independently from the population. Wyoming will have different opinions that New York for example and their voices are necessary in a representative …show more content…
The United States is currently very much divided politically. There’s the liberal left and there’s the conservative right. The partisanship in politics has its uses and its faults. Perhaps the biggest and most blatant benefit to the political party system is that party identification allows voters to know this stance of their candidate on important issues. It is not reasonable or logical to expect detailed information about each candidate on the ballot. Even if it was on the ballot it would not be reasonable to expect or soon that the general population will read each candidate’s individual stance on certain political issues. Therefore the party identification tag allows voters to easily identify where each candidate stands on everything. This gives the voters the ability to accurately vote for who they want to based on what their known political stances are and is the benefit of the political parties. This also allows smaller and lesser known candidates in smaller and more insignificant races the opportunity to ride the wave of any party any given time depending on social factors and national factors that can favor one party over the other Campaigns and important part of elections and in many elections the campaigning began some long before the voting actually

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    A candidate can win the popular vote but still not win the election, because that candidate has more votes from the Electoral College. Some believe that the larger states have too much power. When you have too many electoral votes, the voice of the individual decreases, therefore, leaving little influence in the presidential election. This amount of power makes the voting unequal. Another criticism is the Winner Takes All process.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since results are based on the number of electoral votes and not the number of popular votes, presidential candidates can still win the election even if the nation voted for the other candidate. If the popular votes counted instead of the electoral ones, the candidate we wanted would win, not the one that won because he had the votes of larger states. Problems with representation are also caused by the differing number of votes that states receive because of population. Noble said that there is one electoral vote in California for every 705,454 people. While in Wyoming, there’s one electoral vote for every 194,717 people.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This system favors some citizens over others, which denies some people their choice of president. There is no proper distribution of the vote. Lots of presidents, like President Bush, lost the majority vote but won the electoral vote. As Edwards states, “…’proper distribution’…This claim is nonsense.” Direct voting would increase turnout. Because the citizens would know their vote would actually count for…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While experts complain about this, those labels of the safe states and swing states reflect how people of those states will vote. Another benefit of the electoral college is that candidates must win state by state and this prevents their ability to go to their strongholds and increase turnout-or stuff their ballot boxes. The College makes candidates go to the most evenly divided states of our country to campaign to those voters. In doing this, it has made political parties less extreme and more inclusive than they would be without the Electoral College (US News by Trent England |Contributor Nov 5, 2012). An opposing view by some voters is with the college, small states and swing states will have more power.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College Unfair

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This means that the representative chosen to vote in the electoral college must represent the popular vote or the values that the state holds. Most of the time this is what happens, but sometimes, like with Al Gore & Bush, they can lose the electoral college because the representative voted differently to the state vote. Unfortunately, this seems unfair but sometimes it could be for the better. Truth is, there are many people who go out and vote for someone or something that they are completely uneducated about. Per say, someone could go out and vote for someone without knowing how that candidate feels about certain education issues, gun control reforms, foreign policy issues etc.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Presidential Nominations

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The invisible primary “is mainly an insider game largely played by candidates and party stakeholders” which can heavily influence the outcome even before the state-by-state delegate selection process begins. (Steger, 39) Thus, if party elite can agree on a candidate before the primaries and caucuses begin, that candidate is essentially assured the nomination. Despite the American presidential selection process being uniquely democratic, the party elite still hold quite a lot of power. He also makes sure to distinguish the two types of party stakeholders: leaders of interest groups – such as the NRA or the Human Rights Campaign – and party activists are policy demanders, who want a nominee that supports their issue; party leaders and elected officials tend to look for a candidate who can win the general election. (Steger, 40) This distinction is important, because they have somewhat conflicting agendas, and thus have differing effects on the outcome.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral College is in place to decide the president of the United States. There are people that agree on it and people that do not. The Electoral College System is an inadequate form of electing the president of the United States, there are better ways to go about choosing a president in a more Democratic way. Having a popular vote, or by deciding by congressional districts would be other options that Congress has thought about, and even states have signed in on being for a National Popular Vote. The Electoral College is a representation of the popular vote, on the other hand it makes it unfair at the same time.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this sense, proponents argue that the process “somehow preserves federalism or small states ' legitimate interests” (Edwards 2005, p. 11). One concern of the democratic process is developing methods for maintaining equal representation across all states despite their size. Imbalances due to the weight given to states, the potential for the winner to lose the popular vote, and disproportionate advantages are all cited as major failures of the Electoral College in adhering to democratic principles. Proponents for direct elections cite these implications as a source of criticism of the current system. The national attention on those states that have the variability for political competition can cause an imbalance in issues that candidates consider (Grofman & Feld, 2009).…

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral Process needs to be Reformed The election process in the United States is flawed and has caused serious controversy in past elections on whether or not the process is fair. First, the states all have equal representation to their House and Senate members. Secondly, the election process was set up for the lesser populated states versus the largely populated states. This amendment should be ratified because the Electoral College takes the power away from the people, does not allow a voter to vote for the candidate directly, and will help third parties compete fairly in elections. Some people argue that the election process is working just fine for the United States.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meaning that if majority of voters voted for the Republican candidate in the state, the elector will be more likely to vote Republican. Under the Electoral College, if a voter votes Democrat at the poll, but the state goes Republican, the Democratic candidate will not receive any of the state’s electoral votes. Whereas a more direct election will allow every vote to go to either candidate (US Selection Atlas). Additionally, the Electoral College fails its voters in larger states, because smaller states receive more electoral votes due to a smaller population. According to Fair Vote’s “Problems with the Electoral College” article, it states that “small states were given additional power to prevent politicians from only focusing on issues which affect the larger states.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays