Government Duties In The Criminal Justice System

Improved Essays
The criminal justice system responds to fees paid to the agency or organization, which the crime is affiliated with our government system. These government duties entail upholding an investigation (generally done to see if any admission of guilt occurs). Then once the investigation is signifying the next step is to formally charge of the suspect (execution of charge are delegated for further examination). Then the final process is to set the tone is actually established by making the first initial appearance within the judicial system where the allegations shall be drawn up as public records. According to Bohm & Haley (2012); (p. 8), “these legal systems consist of different agencies within our government system. First, contains the community …show more content…
Our textbook, teaches that a “total of $455.5 billions of dollars were spent to cover the expenses of these criminal activities (Bohm & Haley, 2012).” These illegal activities consisted of protections of our government by-laws and regulations we have set in place within our country. Also, our nation deficient spent towards attorney fees for their services and rehabilitation facilities include an expensive price tag as well. Out of all of the funding dedicated to these diverse government programming majority of the money spent for criminal justice is linked to the state and local mandates. However, when analyzing the federal public funding fees can be connected to spending revenue for criminal justice in the United States impacts our country policies of our government’s procedures. The percentage of the total budget spent on criminal justice was in the billions of dollars. Therefore there should be less revenue allocated towards the judicial system. I feel strategic effort is over indulged based off of the myths associated with these criminal activity. These crimes are often vague and not precise connecting them to reality or any direct form of logic rather than an impulsive action. These funds I believe are mismanaged and could be designated in other demographic areas because the total over exceeds our countries …show more content…
“At first when we explore the design that is a old fashion version that comes across as conservative. Then the second type of model appears more liberated. The difference between the two model is that one offers control on the criminal behavior through usage of our judicial system, whereas the second strategic design value the criminal justice system through protection involving the innocent versus the guilty (Bohm & Haley, 2012, p. 16).” Therefore, this method does bring about a controversy of these mandates our government has in place to regulate these criminal activities from occurring in our global environment. The due process law included that all states will provide equal protection for anyone or to anyone within that state/on those soiled land. Then this amendment goes a little further by saying it also provides the due process under the law and equally provides all the rights of the Constitution despite a person race, sexuality, religious beliefs, and creed. I believe this concept to be significant because equality a form of democracy. Therefore this notion counters the behavioral aspect of logic as to why an individual commits a particular type of crime. The due process serves as a method for “aiding the innocent and convicting those that are guilty of these criminal activities holding them accountable for their actions in regards to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    We need to be just, we need to give people scary stories to keep them out of prison. We can’t make it look like somewhere they want to be, with the privileges of the innocent. As a country, we need to be just as fair as we are just, and vice versa. Which is also in this article, that above all we seek justice, and who can argue that. Stuntz also states that you should always enter court with an understanding of what crime is and what justice is like.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Substantial laws tell if a crime committed by an individual is indeed considered a criminal offense and how severe the crime may be. Furthermore, these laws are what tells if hate crimes are indeed hate crimes or if self-defense crimes are indeed self-defense. Certain elements must be present to consider a crime. It is possible for a suspect to be free to go in court because the jury may decide that the accused did not commit a crime if certain elements are not present. According to (Fuller, 2014), the “thou shall nots” of the criminal law, substantive laws are found in the criminal codes of the state and federal governments and are the result of generations of political and social development.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prenzler (2013) claims that “Government that operate police departments and set the general direction for policing strategies need to be fairly elected and consultative, so that the policing policy framework is representative and balances community concerns wherever possible” (p. 60). The second point was police remain in the subject of law. For example, if police officer commit breaches of administrative or regulator law, they should be charged and punished when found guilty. Furthermore, if there was evidences that police have committed criminal offences they should be charged the same as any citizen. Another important aspect of the legal accountability of police is judicial examination in the courts.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This model is usually at the bottom of the criminal justice system, whereas due process is at the top with the procedures and courts. If police do an unreasonable search and seizure then they are violating the due process. The first advantage of the due process model includes the things that are taken for granted by citizens are what the due process stands for such as the right to fair trial and equality before the law. Nevertheless, in attempt to maintain these rights, impartiality of the judge and jury has been put into place. (http://www.lawteacher.net/criminology/essays/due-process-can-be-explained.php) The juries fundamentally play a key part in the right to fair trial, because the jury is able to provide an equal judge for the defendant, rather than a judge who differs in the defendant’s circumstances.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our Constitution was written to form a more perfect union, not just at the time it was created, but for the future of the union as well. Though we can never be perfect, the Constitution establishes guidelines to help criminal justice professionals make, enforce, and interpret laws to keep order in our country. Their main purpose is to protect and uphold the Constitution. They do this by enforcing laws, protecting citizen’s rights, and promoting justice for all (Dreisbach, 2009, 104). Since laws are man-made they can be flawed and the Constitution allows for amendments to correct these flaws.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Racial Profiling Examples

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Some police officers make assumptions on who is a suspect based on their racial profile but the fact that innocent people are being pursued by these officers and being accused of a crime they never committed is a violation of the constitution. Therefore the policy created by the Department of Justice will be enforced by federal law enforcers but also by local police officers. This new policy enforces the 4th as well as 14th amendment because it ensures that citizens have equal protection under the…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They made the Constitution and the Bill of Rights to define the role of our government and the people, and the protections of EVERYONE under these United States. It is on the shoulder of giants that my value is justice, the protector of the American dream. Under what light should we use jury nullification? To prevent any sort of tyranny and correct unjust and unwanted laws. It is in the best interest in democracy to prevent any sort of tyranny, whether that’s oppressive rule by one or by many.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I chose to compare and contrast the United States’ criminal justice system with England’s system. One significant aspect of the United States’ criminal justice system is due process. Due process is defined by www.reference.com as “the principle that an individual cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property without appropriate legal procedures and safe guards (www.reference.com)”. There are many similarities and differences between these two countries, and this paper is aimed to show how both of their criminal justice systems operate. There are many factors that make the United States one of the best nations in the world.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, the courts tend to attach significant importance to a suspect’s confession regardless if its true or not (Kassin, et al., 2010). Therefore, interrogators should ensure that innocent people are not coerced into providing a false confession. Every individual charged with an offense is required due process through the courts (Gudjonsson & Pearse, 2011). However, the Reid technique exploits suspects vulnerability through manipulative and confrontational tactics (Gudjonsson & Pearse, 2011). This technique is guilt presumptive and is used to break down the suspects resistance and denial…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rights In Criminal Cases

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rights in Criminal Cases One of the articles that I looked at address whether crime victims should have rights during criminal investigation, using the crime Victim’s (CVRA) as the focal point for our discussion. This can also help with like finding the criminals or seeing who is guilty or not. This is part of the first article, our article proceeds in four parts. First, to highlights the importance of applying the act before the formal filing of charges by illustrating how dozens of victims in a notorious federal sex abuse case were deprived of the ability to participate meaning full in the criminal process when federal prosecutors narrowly interpreted their responsibilities under the act. What this is saying is like it tells you the important…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics