Reflective Essay: The Charter Of Rights

Improved Essays
The Charter of rights gives the judiciary power to decide on constitutional issues like the legalization of same sex marriages, prostitution and physician assisted suicide. The parliament rarely interferes in the decisions taken by the courts, whether they agree the way the courts decide the issue or not. In my opinion the parliament should take an active role in settling these controversies and giving guidance to the country because the parliament is a group of elected representatives, representing the interest of the citizens in a country. Issues directly affecting the citizens should involve the representatives of the citizens and when the courts decide on such cases in a way that the citizens do not agree with, the representatives that is the parliament should be able to affect the outcomes to favor the citizens. Certain tools can be used by the parliament in cases where there is a disagreement with the court rulings on rights cases. First thing one should note is the power the judiciary has to ensure its freedom from the influence of the legislature and this power is known as the judicial review. This is the power given to the judiciary to mandate its decision when it perceives another branch of government is against …show more content…
The current example where section 33 was almost used was in 2005, on the case of legalization of same sex marriage, in this case opponents of the same sex marriage called on the parliament to use the section 33 to prevent the judiciary from legalizing this kinds of marriages. Steven Harper, whose party was opposed to same sex marriages, as the party leader was careful to rule out the use of the notwithstanding clause as this would have made it easy for rival parties to paint his party as enemies of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It will highlight the power comparison between the two government bodies. The High Court’s decision is the final say; therefore the examination of what would occur if the High Court found reasoning for a statute to be unconstitutional. Finally the misinterpretation of the unconstitutional statute…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ap Us History Dbq Answers

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. In revolutionary America, five groups of people, which was the New England merchant, the southern planters, the royalists, labors, and small farmer were important because they led independent from Great Britain because of conflict with taxation, trade, and commerce. 2. Samuel Adams and some people who disguised as “Mohawk” led Boston Tea Party because colonial merchants feared that the monopoly would hurt their business.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Legislature checks the Executive by being able to approve presidential nominations, override a President's veto, and impeach the President by removing him or her from the office. The Executive branch checks the Legislature by being able to veto congressional Legislation. The Legislature can check the Judicial Branch by being able to confirm the President's nominations for the Supreme Court judges and the Congress can impeach judges and remove them from the house. The Judicial branch can check the Legislature by being able to call laws unconstitutional. Finally, the Executive branch checks the Judicial branch by being able to nominate Supreme Court Judges and the Judicial branch checks the president by being able to declare presidential acts unconstitutional.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial powers are stated in the Constitution and we labeled the Supreme Court, and those courts that are below the highest in the land, congress has the obligation to establish these courts. Distribution of power allows the Supreme Court to have the final say-so in cases involving: ambassadors, other public ministers and counsels. During any other cases the Supreme Court should have the power of court review and the ability to change the outcomes of the lower courts final deacons. Thus the question that will arise is that, if an act is untasteful in the Constitutions terms can the law become the law of the country, this should be an interesting topic for elected officials.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court should be able to overturn unconstitutional laws that Congress has passed. There are many reasons to give the Supreme Court this power, first we need someone to enforce the fact that no law should violate the Constitution. Next, it helps balance the three branches of government, and lastly the Constitution puts judicial power into the Supreme Court and inferior courts. This power will stop substandard laws from getting passed, and will protect the structure of our government that is extremely based on the Constitution.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial Tyranny Review

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It continuously grew out of control and started to radicalise other courts. The outcome has brought adverse effects to the government of America, ( Boudin, L, 1990).The form of government has been altered since judiciary has expanded its authority to other arm of the government. It has affiliations to the legislature and executive bodies of the government, it is not a solitary body as it was…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is called judicial review. If a law violates the terms of the Constitution, the Supreme Court has the right to invalidate that law. Because of the judicial review the Supreme Court plays an important role in the well-functioning of the law system. It prevents the different sectors of government to abuse their power.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill Of Rights Dbq Essay

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages

    According to History.com, the Bill of Rights is the symbol of what lies at the heart of American idea of individual liberty, limited government, and the rule of law. The Bill of Rights was created to protect the citizens but was not considered important until supporters of the Constitution saw it was pivotal to ratify it. James Madison, the fourth president, was able to make the Bill of Rights officially became part of the Constitution in December 1791 (2009). With the Bill of Rights in place along with the rest of the Constitution, many supreme court cases had arise from citizens fighting for their rights. A prime example involved students John and Mary Beth Tinker with a friend in December 1965.…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Fourth Amendment History

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages

    While it is powerful it is not absolute for it is limited by the other two branches making the checks and balances in our government take place. Judicial Review includes the ability for the court to review laws or an official act of an agent of the government. Terry v. Ohio (Know My Rights). A police officer suspected that three men were about to rob a store and confronted them.…

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is one of the ways that the Judicial Branch checks the other branches. For instance if the congress and the president pass a law but it is believed to be unconstitutional it is sent to the Supreme Court for review where the Justices (9) will analyze the law and use interpretation of previous laws primarily the Constitution the Law of the land so to speak to decide whether the law is truly lawful under the United States…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms can be seen as all-encompassing, and yet, it does not dictate the rules to follow regarding a major component of each person’s life: employment. Or does it? A vast portion of our lives in Canada is spent working, and regardless of the work environment, we interact with other people who may or may not come from the same backgrounds and ideologies as we do. With no specific terminology in the Charter that includes employment law, we must look between the lines and find the connections that lay within. The Charter provides the roadmap for Canadian principles and social values; it lays out the rights and freedoms we have as a people, and promotes the protection of those human rights through its laws.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To maintain the strength of the Judicial Branch having a strong system to provide checks and balances of the other branches of government, there should be a certain level of independence for the Judicial Branch. The Judicial Branch often has the last say in matters regarding judicial review, and because of this, they should be able to operate independently from the other two branches and serve as the final say in these matters. According to Padovano, Sgarra, & Fiorino, (2003), the judiciary is generally better positioned to check such unlawful behavior then voters, since he has access to much better information than they do. Voters that often want a bigger say in these rulings are not always the best options for keeping a strong checks and balances for the highest level of decision making that occurs in the judicial review process. A certain level of independence to the Judicial Branch can allow the certainty of a strong separation of powers and checks and balance system that cannot be controlled by the very parts of government it is trying…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, the Judicial branch then evaluates the laws, and check if they are constitutional or unconstitutional. This process is called Checks and Balances, “The system of separate institutions sharing some powers… its purpose is to keep power divided among the three branches” (Turner,27). By this definition not one power is meant to be all powerful, although…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the British constitution the principle of parliamentary sovereignty is placed at the highest pedestal. The legislature has the power to make, amend or repeal laws. No other person or organisation has the power to change the legislation that is implements. Additionally, the parliament can look into any issue unrestrained, within its jurisdiction. When it comes to parliament applying its authority, there are no sacred cows.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays