Analysis: Why We Should Televise Executions

Superior Essays
“Why We Should Televise Executions” -Is seeing some over-the-top explosions and cartoonish violence from a show, comic, or game comparable to the real thing? No it is not and I propose that to educate the masses and show them what real pain and suffering is like we should have the media televise live executions. It should come as no surprise to anyone that people have an inordinate interest in crime and crime control and in this day and age we can have front row seats to see all sorts of security footages, longwinded trials, and gratuitous amounts of gore and violence. While I don’t really agree or disagree with what people watch in their pastimes, to each their own, I will however raise an objection when someone make the blanket statement …show more content…
If people are so adamant to believe that the death penalty should be implemented so that it can be used as a deterrent to prevent would be psychopaths from acting on their instincts then by that logic it is imperative that it should be shown to the public. By denying reporters from recording the event or even writing a single detail detailing the execution of a cold-blooded killer, the presence of a punishment would be pointless as it wouldn’t strike fear into the hearts of the heartless, but by televising it everyone would understand the …show more content…
As in it is meant to raise debates on matters pertaining to the criminal justice system, tactical uses of taxpayer money, and sometimes the value of human life, as Bailey it is expected that people will argue over the death penalty making it seem like it is a burden on society and that it is only necessary to remove criminals from society, thus they will vouch in favor for life in prison which effectively will have the same, if not better, results (1990). However if politics aren’t enough to influence public opinion or stimulate a gradual shift towards life sentences over death penalties, then at the very least this will encourage the members of criminal justice process to be more thorough when determining if the convict is truly guilty of their crimes. Which means it must come to pass without a shadow of doubt, anything less than that would most likely result in a backlash against the system as the potential murder of an innocent will fall under heavy scrutiny. However if this idea does gain popularity and if it does inspire changes to system as people learn firsthand how those offenders are treated, then perhaps it can influence other countries to do the same as Western ideologies are slowly being integrated into their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If you think about it, capital punishment is a good thing to have because 'An eye for an eye' right? Deterrence is one of the main reasons to use capital punishment, if the criminals know what happens to people who commit horrific crimes it will stop those same crimes from happening again.The death penalty sentence is a controversial subject because those who support the act believe that severe penalties, including death will stop criminals from engaging in crimes. Most criminals are not aware of the consequences of their actions when they kill someone and this is why the death sentence should be a reminder to another criminal of the…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jesus Hernandez Is it acceptable in any case to kill a possible innocent human? Capital Punishment is the sentencing of a man or woman to death instead of him or her serving time in a penitentiary for committing a serious crime like murder. This is an issue everyone should be concerned about because taking away someone’s life is serious and cannot be undone. This issue cannot be focused on by only the government because the citizens need to know how it is affecting them as well. Families could lose loved ones due to a death sentence, and the taxpayers have to pay out of their own pockets for the cost of the execution.…

    • 2346 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once they are dead its over no mulligans, so it should be difficult to make this decision. Koch has a great quote where he says; “If government functioned only when the possibility of error didn 't exist, government wouldn 't function at all.” meaning that government his flawed at all levels and should not be trusted with life. The most important replay Koch gives is does the death penalty cheapen the cost of a life. The death penalty must be seen as the ultimate punishment and not throw around. Yes Koch says if you cannot measure the cost of a human life, but murder can be a ruthless crime, but to condemn another man to death is not only costing that man his life but the emotional weight on the judge jury and the…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Overcrowded Prisons

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With that being said the real criminal can be brought to justice so the victim and the victim’s family can have it too. Many families of the victim argue against the death penalty because they do not agree with it. I believe however that they should face the death penalty, but that is not how things should work out. Just because one person wants it does not mean that it should happen. If the judge gives the criminal the death sentence the family of the victim should be able to decide whether they would like that or life imprisonment.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The topic of death penalty is very controversial, there are some who strongly believe it should be allowed and some who believe it should be abolished. For both reasons there is research that supports each opinion. The death penalty has killed innocent wrongfully convicted people and should not be allowed in any part of the world because killing someone for a crime they committed is not called justice, it is called revenge. There are there other alternatives, ending a person’s life is not the solution, instead of the capital punishment they should be getting life in prison without parole. Abolishing the death penalty does not mean we are not going to punish the criminal; it only means we are doing it in a way that will not disrespect the life of a human.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Simulating Murder Summary

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Humans want to be quilt free which requires them to pin the blame on other for their actions. Murder is a huge crime, which goes to show that it’s hard to justify such action even if done for the sake of another. Free will goes into play in all this, which explains the classic scenario where one is made to kill someone unless they want to be killed or someone else gets killed. When stripped of their free will, people find it morally ok to perform actions of harm when otherwise they wouldn’t. Morality is a big factor but also can become an instigator to produce this…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The debate over the death penalty continues to escalate as more and more individuals gain awareness about the controversies encompassing the topic. This, in turn, calls into question the morality of enacting the process of sentencing someone to death, however, an individual who deliberately murders innocent civilians should not have protection, in regards of morality, from a society, when they pose a dire threat to everyone around them. Morals differentiate between individuals, but the laws put in place by a nation act as a constant that everyone should abide by, despite one’s personal values, because the laws protect the general population who follow them. Only those who contend with the laws will endure the punishments that accompany their…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some people may get closure from executions, others will move with their lives. Yet, some individuals never find peace. So, it would not be right to say that the death penalty gives closure to the victim 's family. In addition to this, the proponents of the death penalty argue that it is moral to kill the murderers. They seem to believe in an eye for an eye justice.…

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many of these rights are considered crucial to the accurate determination of guilt and punishment at trial, so the absence of these protections may undermine our confidence in that determination. This may be of concern in the capital context because although defendants who plead guilty avoid the risk of execution, they still receive very lengthy sentences—typically life imprisonment. The threat of the death penalty has also induced innocent defendants to plead guilty (and even falsely implicate others) to avoid execution. Finally, the study of the plea-negotiation process in the capital context permits us to gain a better understanding of the financial and administrative costs of capital punishment to states and the federal government. Capital trials are extremely expensive, and they rarely reduce prison costs because of the…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    You can’t punish someone based on what they did; Subjectivism will give anyone on this planet a chance to avoid the death penalty. How you might ask, to someone murder might be the biggest sin in the world, but in this system that’s not a moral fact. It’s just how you feel and your opinion towards the objective but again there is no moral objective fact towards your statement. A view like this is what we need, other people can justify that a murderer doesn’t deserve the death penalty. People will open their minds more broadly and look at the person as a human being.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays