Argumentative Essay On The Government Power

Superior Essays
For countless years, we have seen examples of the United States Government having massive power. For instance, government being able to control what we hear and detect on the news. For example, the news about Edward Snowden and how he caught the NSA for surveillancing U.S citizens was biased. There was only opinions against him and the news never went in depth with the topic. This may cause citizens to question whether the government is reliable or not in behave that we entrust them to construct laws and constructing policies that are faithful and somewhat becoming beneficial to us. Another example is how the Government is torturing terrorists. There has been numerous criticism by the reason of that terrorists should not be tortured and the Government decides to resolve the issue by using drones to obliterate its enemies. As a result of these events, the United States Government has been put …show more content…
Honestly, we are able to have a say to it. Apple should give into the FBI and should not to the government’s orders to break into their own devices. Apple is representing us as citizens, so they should help the citizens and decline assisting the FBI. Apple as a business should guarantee the safety and privacy of users information because it is confidential and should not be released without users’ permission. The government wielding too much power in that way would make way for a lot of potential abuse cases, especially when it comes down to accusing someone of being a terrorist and having their private information released just to see whether or not it is true. In a country that has a fear of terrorists, it is easy to point fingers at someone and claim they might be a terrorist, and if the government had the power to investigate this at a personal level, it would leave citizens with fewer rights than ever

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    While the government thought the Patriot Act helped catch terrorists, it actually lacked efficiency. It was unconstitutional that the government could allow the Attorney General to detain foreigner who wanted to immigrant in the United States to suspect if they looked suspicious. Most of people under the Act were put in prison without charges and regardless if they are innocent. Also, it wasted lots of vital resources on researching everybody and waste of money. Also, Patriot Act gave the FBI to increase entitled to spy on people which strip human rights.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Edgar Hoover are “accomplices after the fact,” and implies that not only is there a government conspiracy surrounding the assassination of Kennedy, but the strings of that conspiracy are likely being pulled by some international shadow government. The film implies, through the fabricated character of X, that the reason why no one has tried to harm or assassinate Garrison is because the case has made him too high-profile to remove without raising questions, “You 've become a significant threat to the national security structure. They would have killed you already but you got a lot of light on you. Instead they 're trying to destroy your credibility.” Yet these same people (according to Garrison) are willing to assassinate a president of the United States, a presidential candidate, and an extremely public civil rights leader. The argument doesn’t hold water, or as Senator Long would put it, “that dog don’t…

    • 1323 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    With the FBI being professional, Apple could develop a technique that could be shared to enhance personal security while balancing private security. If those that are serving our country isn’t allowed to fully operate, unnecessary conflict will occur which will not only affect the U.S but become a worldwide problem. Terrorist are viewed as people that have given up their rights, therefore obtaining their information shouldn’t be questioned unless the company supports…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Obama Administration defended the surveillance program saying “ it 's legal, limited and effective with preventing terrorist acts” (www.cfr.org). The surveillance program is effective with preventing terrorist attacks, but this violates the Fourth Amendment right because they are collecting data from everywhere and everyone around the country. According to the News Team staff of cfr.org people are starting to revolt against these outraeous and unlawful actions. Judge Richard J. Leon said “ surely such a program infringes that degree of privacy, that our founding fathers enshrined in the Fourth Amendment” (www.cfr.org). After, the exposure of the NSA in the mid-2013 American citizens have started to protest against these unlawful actions and development movements to protect their right of…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scott concernedly explains that by not controlling illegal aliens, it will propagate issues in the United States. Furthermore, the government needs to do more to stop illegal immigration by taking control of the issues. To begin, Scott tells his own personal connection to illegal immigration, which makes him sound more credible as an author. He goes into detail about how in his hometown, in California, he witnessed illegal aliens waiting for transportation. When police or immigration officers were informed of this, they were not too concerned.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    US Senator Richard Burr says, “We are on the floor today talking about taking away some of the tools that have been effective in helping us thwart attacks. It is the wrong debate to have” (“Pros and Cons”). Security and stability in life come with the appropriate protections and preparations. Allowing surveillance to provide security to the country will save people from having to worry about major terrorist attacks, such as 9/11, from happening again. Also, technology is advancing in every part of the world, so it would be a waste not to make use of the resources under America’s possession, especially when every other country could be using it against American citizens.…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But what authorized investigation is all of America’s phone records relevant to? Government surveillance is out of control and is undermining the basic human right to privacy in the United States. The intended purpose of government surveillance is to make a preemptive strike on terrorist attacks before they can happen. According to Lynn Reaser from Point Loma Nazarene University, “The sacrifice of a small amount of security may well be worth the benefit of saving lives” (Roger 4). To Reaser, the end justifies the means when it comes to surrendering freedom in the name of safety.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It could also be called an alliance if you would like to think of it that way. “The CIA had assisted the Mujahedeen leading up to and during their fight to repel the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.” Bin Laden had also sent funds and fighters. If this happened to be true, how disgusting would it be to have a government that lies to their civilians and teams up with our worst enemy? Now everybody is looking at their fellow the government, Wall Street and the military of the United States and wondering what else they have lied about. Why should the United States have to keep their files so confidential if it is about the people’s country, and the people’s government?…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    And I think that 's both a strategic and a tactical error” (Rutger) In contemporary society, the communications revolution has made it easier for the government to spy on its citizens and track down perceived enemies or leakers. Technology has stimulated the free flow of information, but it has also created a more invasive American government. Also, opponents state that technology allows enemies and leakers to freely access information that they can use to destroy American democracy and civil…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some have put their own privacy at the top, while others put the safety of our nation above individual privacy. Are a couple iPhones an adequate price to pay for the safety of all Americans against terrorist organizations? This device would not breach the privacy of all Americans. The iPhone’s lack of data retrievability would also be a selling point to terrorists who would like to be as incognito to the government as possible. Apple is directly defying numerous court orders that require them to create the…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays