The Benefits Of Stricter Gun Control Laws

Superior Essays
It’s 1:30 a.m., awakened by the sound of glass breaking, she immediately dials 911. She rushes to get her .38 caliber revolver from the drawer of her nightstand to protect herself. She frantically searches inside the drawer, but she cannot find it. Gun control laws no longer allow her to own one; leaving her fate to the criminal. The 2nd Amendment to the United States Constitution adopted on December 15, 1791, protects the right of people to keep and bear arms (Brooks, Chad. "The Second Amendment & the Right to Bear Arms." LiveScience. TechMedia). Stricter gun laws do not prevent criminals from being in possession of guns, but instead, removes guns from law-abiding citizens thereby inhibiting their ability of self-protection. “Guns don’t kill people. People kill people” (Sub tropic Productions LLC). Gun control laws will not prevent evil people from committing homicidal acts upon the innocent. Subsequently, restrictive gun control …show more content…
Gun bans remove weapons from citizens, placing them at risk for victimization. Stricter gun control laws will favor the criminal as there is an increased chance that the citizens will be unable to defend themselves making them vulnerable to attacks. Criminals will become increasingly brazen, no longer committing crimes in the dead of the night. Citizens will have to sit idly by, no longer able to thwart crimes in progress.
Contrary to opponents for gun control, pro-gun control supporters do not believe the Second Amendment is an unlimited right to carry guns and therefore, does not infringed upon their rights (ProCon.org). They are of the opinion that laws supporting background checks will prevent guns from reaching the hands of criminals, ultimately saving lives. Pro-gun control supporters believe strong gun restrictions are necessary to keep weapons away from dangerous people whose intentions are to inflict

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This belief, however, is disproved by evidence. If guns are made illegal to own, law-abiding citizens will then turn in their guns. However, those who wish to do harm with their guns would keep their guns illegally. Therefore, these laws not only take guns away from responsible citizens, but give those who wish to keep their guns an unfair advantage if they were to attack another person (ProCon.org). Gun control laws are ineffective and should not be in present in today’s society.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gun Control Effectiveness

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages

    By definition a criminal is someone who does not abide by the laws. So will harder gun laws actually stop someone from getting a firearm? The answer is no it will not stop them from getting a firearm. You can look at the prohibition and the ban on illegal substances. Laws don’t stop criminals from getting illegal things from illegal dealers.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is Gun Control Good Or Bad

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not only does it cause law abiding citizens to feel that their safety and rights are being infringed but it does not help prevent violent crimes. As has been mentioned, in some states the more gun-owners there were resulted in less violent crimes to occur. Despite the amount of laws that could be placed to prevent criminals from obtaining weapons there are still black markets and other illegal ways for them to get guns. Unfortunately, gun control would only be affecting those who abide by the law in obtain guns and using them. The United States should not be a place where people fear for their lives and have no way of protecting themselves.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns are not the problem, people are. Gun laws will only prevent law abiding citizens from getting guns to protect themselves from both legally and illegally armed criminals. People often misunderstand the purpose of the Second Amendment. Many anti gun argue that the Second Amendment is out dated…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    People should have the right to protect themselves, their families, and their property, however there are guns that can be purchased that have no real purpose unless you are planning a mass shooting. Of course some people just purchase these because they believe they are cool. I agree that these should be illegal to sell. Gun control would be great, but I believe it is an impossible goal. In a perfect world we would be able to get control, or better yet never have invented such a violent weapon.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns do not kill people; people kill people. Shooting a gun does not simply happen by itself, but the person behind the gun pulling the trigger. By regulating gun laws, we may say that by having stricter gun control, it will be difficult for criminals to get a hold of a gun, but it does not mean that there will be less crime or fewer deaths. Criminals do not follow the law regardless, so what makes everyone think that by having gun control, or by regulating gun laws that it will change the way things are. Therefore, there should not be stricter gun control laws in the United States.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Guns Are Bad

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Your normal citizen doesn't have drugs, but bad people do. If guns are taken away, only the good people won't have them. ( Ronald Cruise). The gun control law is not being followed by some citizens, therefore more rules are being added to the law towards gun control a good background check will keep the guns out of people who should not have them to prevent criminal, drug dealers, domestic abusers, and mentally ill people from carrying the gun. therefore, people who do not follow this law should face consequences, for example, time in jail or police taking gun licene from guns holder.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That not only will not decrease the number of criminals have guns, but also decrease the number of law-abiding citizens have guns, which make law-abiding citizens lose ability of self – protection. The more important thing is that sources of crime is the people’s thoughts and desires. Each of the shootings the killers was the person who shot, not the gun itself. The Government cannot simply rudely to solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control will not be able to stop the use of guns, and it will put citizens in an unfair situation where they cannot protect themselves. The way to stop gun violence is to protect and elevate gun rights and educate…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They may think that we as Americans possess the right to own a firearm. By definition only the police forces, national guard, and militia possess the right to own a firearm. Those who are against the repeal of the second amendment, and believe that we should be able to own guns as self defense, do not consider the violence that has already taken place because of them. The current gun control laws keep us away from heavy weapons that are exclusive to forces like, marines, army, navy for the most part. They have done a good job of that.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays