Freedom Of Speech In The Classroom Analysis

Improved Essays
The U.S Constitution grants an American Citizen the Constitutional right to freedom of speech and expression, but there are certain groups of citizens that are being denied their right to freedom of speech and expression. Teachers in the United States are being denied their First Amendment right to freedom of speech and expression by limiting on how they express their views on education, limits on what they can put on blogs or letters, and limiting on how they might use social media. Teachers have their own opinions about how a classroom should be taught, either by giving a lecture, a hands on activity or connecting a material with the real world. There are some teachers who use controversial techniques to teach a material in the classroom, …show more content…
(Holley n. pag.). Not only posters, but teachers are deprived of their freedom of speech when they write blogs on their social media. In 2009, english teacher Natalie Munroe mostly wrote about her personal life on her blogs. Sometimes, she also wrote about her students, usually complaining about them and calling some “selfish brats”, “rat-like” and many more (Holley n. pag.). Her contract was terminated (Holley n. pag.). Teachers who wrote their opinion about certain school actions were also denied their rights. Marvin Pickering a high school teacher’s contract was terminated after he wrote an article to the local newspaper complaining how school was spending more on athletics and less on academic materials (Vasek, Hendricks, 2.). Teacher’s rights are protected outside the classroom like any other person and can do their personal interests, they can post non-school and non-students related posts on social media, including …show more content…
His account was checked by the school counselor after receiving complaints from students, during the check school counselor found many of the items to be disturbing and immediately asked Spanierman to deactivate the Myspace account. Spanierman eventually deleted the account, but just few days later, he created another Myspace account called "apollo68." when the 2nd account was found and checked by the school officials, they found the “apollo68” consisted of similar friends list and a very similar type of conversation as Spanierman 's "Mr. Spiderman" account (Spanierman 5). The school board did not renew his contract for next year because they believed that it would disrupt the learning environment for students, and he had exercised poor judgment as a teacher (Spanierman 37). He filed a court case against the school board claiming that his his 1st and 14th amendment had been violated (Spanierman , 1). Court ruled against Spanierman, they stated that Spanierman was not forced to create and use the Myspace by the school, he was using the account as a mean of personal use and creative writing and it had nothing related to do with the school or as an educational tool (Spanierman 31). U.S teachers are being denied to their First Amendment right by limiting their views on education, limiting their

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Lopez (1975) Justice Powell commented, “As it is difficult to think of any less consequential infringement than suspension of a junior high school student for a single day, it is equally difficult to perceive any principled limit to the new reach of procedural due process.” Schools and athletic administrators would be wise to consider this comment and recognize that it is a still-developing area of law, with consequences that are not always predictable. Therefore, it is prudent for them to develop rigorous policies and procedures to protect themselves and coaches, in the event that a property or liberty interest is…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, the question of whether a group of students’ rights under the first amendment are violated is asked. These students had written articles for their school newspaper, which they had then submitted for review to their advisor, who passed the articles on to the principal, Robert Reynolds. Reynolds found two articles concerning, and with the approval of his superiors, eradicated the two pages that these articles were on from that publication of the newspaper. The principal’s deletion of these articles did violate the students’ rights under the 1st Amendment.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The student tried to take social media to their advantage because they thought they would not be punished for it. The first amendment states that citizens should be able to express and be exposed to wide range of opinions. Some countries have a law that if they opinion is a direct threat to someone they can lose their freedom. Limiting a students speech if they have not posted a threat violates the First amendment, which makes it unconstitutional.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Goss Vs Lopez Case Study

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    FACTS a. Nine students were suspended from their respective public high schools in Ohio for up to ten days without a hearing and/or notification of the grievances that occurred. Believed this was unconstitutional in that it permitted school administrators to deprive plaintiffs their right to an education due to the lack of a hearing. b. Records on the students’ punishments were not clear in many cases of why exactly they were suspended and in some of the cases, there was not clear evidence that the student acted in the way the school said they did. c. Ohio Law provides an education…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lauren Garcia Professor Hinrichs KIN 550 15 May 2018 Assignment 1 The first case I looked at was TENNESSEE SECONDARY SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, PETITIONER v. BRENTWOOD ACADEMY. The underlying issue here is a high school football coach sent out a letter to eighth grade boys, violating TSSAA’s rule for prohibiting coaches from using undue influence while recruiting middle school athletes. This lawsuit became vital in sports law because it was the first time the Supreme Court had to make a decision regarding which entities are bound by the First Amendment. Brentwood sued the TSSAA claiming they were violating the schools first and 14th amendment rights.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Seamons V. Snow Case Study

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Seamons v. Snow 206 F.3d 1021 (2000) Facts Brian Seamons, plaintiff, a student-athlete and member of the Sky View High School football team in Smithfield, Utah, was dismissed from the team as he refused to apologize to the team for reporting to the police and school administration of being assaulted by four teammates in the locker room. Seamons, claimed his First Amendment of free speech was violated because of his refusal to apologize to his teammates. Disciplinary action to the four attackers was not initiated by the coach even after a meeting was held with the coach, parents and the principle of the school as well as a separate meeting with the coach and the four team captains of the football team. Issues Under the First Amendment…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas vs. Johnson (An analysis of the supreme court case Texas vs. Johnson and the current repercussions of the decision) The first amendment protects many of our basic rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, etc. The framers of our constitution left a broad wording to leave room for our country to grow and change as time went on. One of the adjustments our country has made over time is to define the actions and words protected under the freedom of speech. There are three basic categories of free speech; pure speech, is communication only through words, speech plus is speech plus an aid such as a sign or a chant, and symbolic speech, an action that communicates meaning without the use of words.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court case that I have decided to research was Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier. Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier was a Supreme Court case that asked the question, “Do schools have the right to revise or change the contents of a student article for privacy or other reasons? And does it infringe their 1st Amendment right?”…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros Of Confederation

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Supreme Court finalized that the school had punished the petitioners unfairly since the students did not disrupt the learning process or intrude upon the rights of others. The students possessed the right to free…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Trigger warnings on college campuses, as a means to warn students of course material that may be offensive or disturbing to them, should not be allowed because it does not allow professional, intellectual academic discourse to occur. College professors are staring to second think on what course material to teach, because many students become offended with what comes out of the professor’s mouth, this also applies to comedians that would perform, but now they can’t because of the immaturity of students. Macroaggressions are the leading cause for the existence of trigger warnings. Macroaggressions are words or actions done by someone with no intent of harming someone, yet people take it the wrong way and think of it as a kind of violence.…

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dist. , the court held that a school’s limitation on student speech need only be “reasonable and viewpoint neutral. 623 F.3d 71, 78 (2nd Cir. 2010). That case dealt with a student who was banned from returning to school after threats made against him, due to insulting words he said against the race of another student who had died. The school did not allow DeFabio took present any speech, as that could have been interpreted as taking his side.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Schools should be allowed to limit students’ online speech. But schools should limit students’ online freedom of speech because students’ cyberbully students and staff, disrupt students learning, and impacts other people 's lives. Both Freedom of Speech and The First Amendment has the same meaning, which is that there is no law that abridge the freedom is the right to give your opinion about a topic. The freedom to speak or write without the government restraint and First Amendment protects the freedom of speech, religion, and petition and they have the right to seek out writing and thoughts of anyone they choose to hear or write. The U.S. Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787, the constitution did not included all the freedom escentuals…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Students do not "shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate," the Supreme Court famously said that in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District. However, in the digital age, the formal request of Tinker has been very complicated by the fact that the schoolhouse gate is no longer restricted in certain categories to a brick-and-mortar structure, but may it now be a student 's home computer, tablet, or cell phone. In recent years, the number of social media and technology has provided people who teach others and people who support a policy alike with challenges concerning the legal rule made and protected by authority of student behavior, speech, and facial expressions, and whether the famous Tinker declaration stays…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There was a time when the internet wasn’t a thing. Back in the old days, if a person wanted to bully someone would have to do it in person. Since we have the internet now, a person could bully someone with their mind and social media. Schools should limit students’ online speech because students are cyberbullied, cyberbullying causes harassment, and teachers and staff and be affected by cyberbullying too. One reason why schools should limit students online speech is that students can hurt other students’ feelings.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To me both freedom of speech and academic freedom serve the same purpose and necessity, especially on a college campus. If institutions of higher learning are allowed to infringe on the expressed rights of students, faculty, and staff as a nation it is my belief that we have lost all hope in our government, and in the laws that are implemented to serve and protect us. The Bill of Rights was implemented to protect society, institutions of higher learning were also implemented to protect society, if one disregards the other it will be a systemic failure that we will all…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays