Essay On The Role Of Slavery In The Civil War

Improved Essays
Your high school teacher was right, the idea that the civil war was fought to free the slaves is a common misconception. At the dawn of the civil war, the debate of whether the institution of slavery was morally right or wrong was not the basis on which the decision to go to war was decided. Union and federal government never attacked the moral values of slavery, and did not wage war on the south to free slaves. Instead, the freedom of slaves was a tactic, used by both sides as a way to gain an advantage in the conflict. The emancipation of slaves was an influential moment in the war undoubtedly, however the influence slavery had on the initiation of the civil war was very small. Many people today still believe that the southern states seceded from the U.S because the slave industry was in danger, however this is not the truth. The southern slave industry was never at risk at the beginning of the civil war, the federal government made sure southerners knew that. In Abe Lincoln’s first inaugural address, he addressed this matter specifically, “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.” (Lincoln, Abe). The risk of losing slaves was not what caused the south to secede, instead …show more content…
However, the Civil War was not a fight to free these slaves, and is too commonly mistaken as such. The use of emancipation of slaves was used during the war strictly as a weapon, by both the Union and Confederacy, to gain an upper hand in the war. This tactical use of freedom can be seen as wrong, and whether or not it is morally right, it did in fact greatly influence the outcome of the civil war. Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation secured Union victory, and was in all aspects a pivotal moment in Americas

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    If Northern legislators vehemently opposed slavery, they would have done more to reverse it. Even the new “antislavery” political parties that came about some years after the Compromise of 1850 did not attempt to actually free enslaved people. For example, William Lloyd Garrison once described the Free-Soil Party as “…a party for keeping Free Soil and not for setting men free.” Despite the blatant, horrendous moral injustices that slavery presented, self-declared opponents of slavery did little to oppose slavery based on…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Emancipation Proclamation was just basically a symbolic gesture. It did not “freed” slaves completely, it was only valid to "freed" slaves that were in rebelling states such as Maryland, which had slaves, but did not succeed because still slave owners were allowed to keep their slaves. And it was not until the 13th Amendment was passed that Slaves were declared illegal/slaves were set free. Before the war the north was neutral about slavery, they even made the fugitive clause with the south which meant that any slaves that would go north escaping, would be sent back to its owner. With this in mind, the slavery issue was not a strong factor that lead to the civil war but it indeed had a little participation in it.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He is correct to say that the South is not alone in its sin against Blacks. The North was indeed responsible as well. However, as Tindall and Shi point out slavery was the main reason for war. They state, “To argue that the Civil War was primarily a defense of liberty and the right of self-government…ignores the actual reasons that southern leaders used in 1860–1861 to justify secession and war” (Tindall and Shi 497). The leaders of the south wanted to keep slavery and they went to war over it.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gary W. Gallagher didn’t believe that the war was over slavery but, that the war was over the Union. He provided solid evidence on why he believed that the Civil War was not over slavery but over the Union. I provided evidence also that joined Gary W. Gallagher that the war’s primary focus was the Union. The war was fought for the Union but, the Union attacked slavery because they knew that slavery was a dominant tool that the Confederates used. Moreover, if the war was fought over slavery then slavery would’ve ended when the war did not months after.…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A former slave of the south wrote a letter about how a slave in these times cannot serve two masters. The Union wants them to join their army, while the South seeks to keep them as slaves. President Lincoln sought to arm as many soldiers, whether the soldier was white or colored it didn’t matter if it meant it would crush the Southern rebellion. All the slaves sought for was not to serve two masters, but they wanted nothing more than liberty. Deep down, they knew that if slavery was still enacted there would always be a rebellion against the Union.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As mentioned above he has no purpose to stop the ongoing slavery, he was also a neutral body for the abolishment of the slavery. It was done for making he force more powerful as adding the Union army with the slaves and end the civil war. This was also only in the rebellion states. He also clarifies that he has no such right to end the slavery nor he intend to do such in the near future, but he was a person who wanted a freedom from the war and a peaceful America. It was very hard for the southern part of the country because of the war and separate…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Douglass believes the war could not have been prevented for two reasons. The first reason is that the birth of our nation began with a moral divide between the North and the South (414). Slavery is what divides the nation. The second reason is that no one stood up against slavery early enough to put it to an end. Even the great men in the government who knew what could happen if slavery was not ended did not try to abolish it.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is my opinion, that the American Civil War was unavoidable. The war was destined to take place unless one side decided to back down from the other, which was not going to happen due to the presence of hardliners in both the North and the South. The only way to avoid Civil War was to abolish slavery, the South was not going to let that happen without a fight. They needed slaves in their society and were more than established in their ways. Needless to say, the South did not give up their position on the institution of slavery and they had good reason not to.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    While the issue of slavery was a massive factor in the war, it was not the defining factor. The Union army never declared war to coerce the South into abolishing slavery, but to keep the country united. The Union Army fought to maintain the Union, and the emancipation proclamation serves as a means to end the war. Like many scholars, Glory, Gods and Generals, Gettysburg,…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Choctaw Indians Case Study

    • 1771 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This is not what most Americans today remember being the main purpose of the war. c) To many, the Civil War was fought for the preservation of the Union. President Lincoln’s purpose in fighting the war was to reunite the shattered halves of the Union. I believe President Lincoln freed slaves for the good of the Union, not necessarily for the slaves. In fact, he even said that if there was a way to save the Union without freeing slaves, he would do it.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays