The Importance Of Sherlock Holmes

Superior Essays
Nancy Drew and Sherlock Holmes appear in many movies and books. In particular Nancy Drew appeared in the 2007 movie Nancy Drew, and Sherlock Holmes appeared in the book The Hound of the Baskervilles.Although Nancy Drew has modern technology equipment to help her, Sherlock Holmes is a better detective because his powers of deduction, instinctual actions, and reliance on a sidekick help him be more efficient.
Watson, Sherlock Holmes’ partner, is his long time friend throughout the Sherlock Holmes series. Having a strong bond with your partner can be vital to solve a case. On Page 3 Sherlock Holmes said, "but you are a conductor of light.” This quote from Sherlock Holmes is a phrase similar to the one in Stars Wars, “We are the spark that will
…show more content…
He likes to keep things to himself and not involve the police. Sherlock Holmes is effective because he takes action. His plans tend to be a little on the un-safe side and the Hound of the Baskervilles is no exception. In this book Sherlock developed a plan to help catch Stapleton, his plan put Sir Henry's life on the line. Also, Sherlock Holmes does not use the police. Instead, on page … Sherlock brought in Lestrade. Together Watson, Sherlock, and Lestrade were able to catch Stapleton without Sir Henry dying. The reason Sherlock Holmes’ method of catching criminals is so good is because he takes risks with people he can trust. Even though his methods can be somewhat irrational, but he gets results. Nancy Drew, on the other hand, is a talker and much more involved with the police. She is so involved with the police that in the movie Nancy Drew, the police captain even says, “I wish she was on the force.” However Detectives and Sleuths cannot work with the police, because they have different methods of solving cases. Detectives and sleuths, just like Nancy Drew, outsmart there criminals, and the police do not. For example, in the 2007 movie Nancy Drew, she ends up stalling her criminal long enough for a caretaker to come and slap him on the head with a shovel. Another reason why not to trust the police is because of all the recent incidents involving “brutal treatment” for “victims” of …show more content…
Sherlock Holmes is very active when solving crimes and does not rely on the police. And, Sherlock Holmes’ gadgets are very efficient in solving crimes. On the contrary , Nancy Drew lacks a trusting partner, and has a different one in every story. Nancy Drew likes to involve the police when solving crimes, and likes to talk her way out of problems. Finally, Although Nancy Drew’s gadgets are more technologically advanced, they are not as efficient. These observations are also true in the real world, because things are always easier with two people, you have to take action and be proactive to complete assignments, and you want to use efficient ways of completing

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Sherlock Holmes is an introvert, focused on his inner thoughts to solve problems. He is famous for the extreme attention he pays to clues, solving cases solely on the basis of his observational skills. Sherlock uses logic to draw conclusions rather than using beliefs or personal values. His preference is for thinking rather than feeling. Finally, he uses his senses rather than intuition to solve crimes.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though it is impossible not to leave any evidence behind at a crime scene, if it disappears before police can get to it, then there is no evidence left that could lead to them. Taking extraordinary measures and being patient has helped lots of killers get away with their crimes without anyone knowing what they did. Smart killers target victims who are less likely to draw attention which is exactly what Brady Hartsfield did when he picked out some of his victims. Intelligent killers study a lot before going out and killing someone. Killers that do that have now realised that if they target minority children, teens, and adults then they are less likely to get caught.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although there are many reasons why Holmes possibly love solving crimes, some of the most prominent reason could be that Holmes like the thrill and the excitement from exposing the truth to catch the murderer. The satisfaction feeling to be the one bring justice without chasing the criminal down like most police would do, but instead using observation, deducting, and trickery to do so. Another reason would be that Holmes gets to use his brain to solve “impossible cases” and learn new thing, as someone who love a good challenge would like. Every time Holmes revealing the killer’s tricks to the police, his reputation would increase each time as a “Greatest detective of London.” Although Holmes never once boast about his accomplishment and show off to others however, with such an incredible reputation all of the praise still affect Holmes making him a little arrogance. In one of Doyle’s short stories call “The Adventure of Abbey Grange”, Holmes asked Inspector Hopkins if he sees anything strange with the evidence but when the Inspector did not Holmes said, “What?…

    • 1303 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sherlock was able to subdue her, but she needed more help than a soft spoken newsie. Sherlock proceeded to dissect her and noted that not any doll runs around these corrupt streets looking for trouble if she isn’t in trouble herself. Sherlock kindly asked if I would like to join his ventures and I accepted. I like Sherlock. His keen application of deduction and intuition allows him to piece the crime faster than a moving picture.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Jumping to such a conclusion makes Holmes seem incredibly smart. If Holmes had narrated the story instead of Watson, there would not have been as much of a mystery since we would see Holmes’s inner monologue as he figured out the facts for himself. Conan Doyle chooses to have Watson narrate it, because it makes reading about Sherlock’s discoveries more interesting and allows Sherlock’s intelligence to be displayed. Not hearing Holmes’s inner monologue helps “A Scandal in Bohemia” start off with dramatic deductions that help set the tone of curiosity. Conan Doyle uses this tone to make the reader want to know how Holmes figured out what he did.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    According to Curry (2001), "Reality-based policing shows such as COPS also provide the public with a look at the life of a police officer as well as the TV show, Disorderly Conduct Video On Patrol ' '. Often these shows are not accurate portrayals, creating an image of policing that is more exciting and glamorous than it is in reality. Many of these shows focus on the patrol aspect of policing, misrepresenting the amount of teamwork that policing requires in solving crimes". These shows tend to depict officers as always been very busy while on duty. The TV show “Disorderly Conduct Video On Patrol”, however, shows more of the good cops catching criminals and how the job is actually done.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That is also why there is aways changes in many scientific conclusions, other people just observe further and prove old conclusions are wrong. Inductive detection like anything has pros and cons and is used by many people all the time. Whether we enjoy using inductive or deductive reasoning, the process of inductive thinking is one of the most used ways we form ideas about things. I believe for a detective to be successful, he must become a master at inductive detection.. Sherlock holmes is the best example of how a detective can use deductive or inductive detection to their benefit. Sherlock holmes is a special kind of detective, he uses both deductive and…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Undoubtedly, Sherlock Holmes was not guilty for killing Dr. Roylott! Sir Arthur Conan Doyle in “The Adventure of the Speckled Band” developed Dr. Roylott into a cruel character, who later died from his own crime that Sherlock Holmes attempted to solve. Nevertheless, Sherlock Holmes was unequivocally not culpable for Dr. Roylott’s death! Sherlock Holmes found several pieces of evidence to make a logical prediction. Predictions are not always accurate; he did not know all the facts of the situation.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to reporter Eileen Sullivan, “Body cameras have become an easy political answer to the complex problem of crumbling trust in police.”4 Body cameras are often attached to the chest or hat of a police officer. Smaller than a cell phone, the cameras do not hinder the police officers performance, and are practically unnoticeable. The officer can turn off the camera, but the times they are able to are regulated. This small device records and stores all interactions that an officer has, including all misconducts. The cameras are especially important in instances of corrupted officers and excessive police force.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sherlock Holmes Qualities

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Modern detectives nowadays rely less on their wits to solve cases, than the detectives who once could figure things out just by looking at it. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes focuses more on observation, using his brash nature to solve a case quickly, while likewise, Agatha Christie's Hercule Poirot is more curious, taking time to solve a case and make sure all the clues fit together. Topic 1: Sherlock Holmes Sherlock Holmes is described as “brilliant” by friends and colleagues, using his knowledge to solve even the most difficult of cases. His brilliance is noted by Dr. Watson, who upon first meeting, is told that he has been in…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays