One argument against emphasizing science throughout primary education is the cost. Critics argue that the cost of the necessary materials and instructors outweigh the benefits of teaching science throughout primary education. As a result, schools cut the number of science classes offered in middle and high school. Additionally the requirements for graduating can require two or three science classes instead of four. I personally experienced this while I was in high school and due to my lack of interest in the field, I elected not to take science after I had fulfilled the requirement. Numerous schools have adopted this method in order to use the extra money
One argument against emphasizing science throughout primary education is the cost. Critics argue that the cost of the necessary materials and instructors outweigh the benefits of teaching science throughout primary education. As a result, schools cut the number of science classes offered in middle and high school. Additionally the requirements for graduating can require two or three science classes instead of four. I personally experienced this while I was in high school and due to my lack of interest in the field, I elected not to take science after I had fulfilled the requirement. Numerous schools have adopted this method in order to use the extra money