Ways Of Knowing Analysis

Improved Essays
“To what extent do the concepts that we use shape the conclusion that we reach?” When you think about it, to a certain extent we actually utilize the concepts that we acquired overtime to shape the conclusions reached. We as people for the part may use concepts that we know, take pieces from it and use what we know ourselves to come up with this conclusion. To be able to achieve the goal of actually giving a direct answer to this question, reasoning and memory would be used as ways of knowing along with History as Areas of Knowledge.
With the given ways of knowing, when it comes to coming to a conclusion about a certain topic some of the ways of knowing are used: reasoning and memory. Reasoning is a way of explaining, justifying, and understanding
…show more content…
Memory another way of knowing causes us to retell whatever it is stored in our brains. The thing about memory is that it isn’t really the first source we as people would go to because first everyone memory could get distorted out of emotion or with time, for example with the two witnesses, the first witness could have been shocked out of their wits that Suspect A was really suspect B, so then the question is to what extent do we trust the witnesses reasoning when their memory could have been distorted? This is problem some might have with History for example, whenever someone is retelling accounts of what happened during the time period who is to say that a certain event happened? Who are we to trust? To what extent there is any validity to the event? How do we know if the person recounting the event is fabricating the story or the person could have remembered a fraction of what happened and tried to fill in the gaps with false truths? All of these questions that can flow through the mind, but the answer itself isn’t to concrete. We learn American History because it is necessary to know about how America came to be, but how can you trust everything that comes out of a History book, when there is a small possibility that it may not be true? When it comes to learning new information especially when you are ignorant of everything …show more content…
To some people they’ll say history is the events that happened in the past while others may say that history isn’t just looking in the past, but us looking deeper, interacting with past events. Usually people believe what happens in History because for the most part the events that has ensued has been reiterated time and time again. The thing is History is always being rewritten to hold more validity, so there are people who pick and choose and still learn to come to a different conclusion, making one side of the argument. The other side of the argument is that with History the past no longer exist so who is to say what happened in the history books actually happened, the events that were recounted in these books could be false and everybody could be eating it all up, making the conclusion that everything in the textbook is factual, like previously said people make the argument that no one should go into a subject ignorant because then the concepts you just learned will shape your

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    For example, one may be very knowledgeable as to what makes up the nation’s history, however, they will never know for sure what occurred earlier that day. The main difference between history and other areas of knowledge is that in history, you should use your logical ability of interpretation to really appreciate the significance of the event the occurred. This logical way of interpreting events is necessary when distinguishing significant events from not so significant ones. As well as this, history is composed of a range of different people’s interpolations, which can give us a range of theses. Once we impose our own opinion on the subject matter, we can form our personal thesis which is ultimately, only truly valid to us.…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This means that if he did not have enough information to back up what he was studying or trying to understand he would not accept it. He would only accept until he saw himself that it was proven. This is something that not only affected the people during his time but has also affected many of the generations that have followed. Descartes rule made people realize that they believed things that were not backed up by evidence. During this time people might have decided to start looking to prove their ideas, ask questions, and not just believe what they were told but to look for evidence.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some critics have insisted that historical fiction reveals more about its author than its historical subject, or, as Henry Seidel Canby has said, historical fiction is "more likely to register an exact truth about the writer's present than the exact truth of the past.” (Brown) Writers commonly take their own experiences and opinions and incorporate them into their prices. More often than not this is where authors get the plot or major plot points for their story, which can easily alter the historical accuracy if they are writing historical fiction. This is because events from there own life would most likely not fit into the time period they are writing about. “Applying the writer’s biography to one’s reading of a novel strikes me as less a matter of cheating or impurity than an additional, incidental pleasure: Ah, I know where that came from … For as soon as we identify two works by the same person, we begin to make connections between them — to notice similarities of subject and theme, treatment and technique.”…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Winthrop Analysis

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    History is the study of past events. However, there are many accounts of the events from the past. How are we supposed to know which one is right? It is simple there is no one correct version of it .History is not just about the facts, but rather the interpretation of these facts. Interpretations and perspectives not only make history more interesting, but they allow people to analyze and create their own individual conclusions.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If you were to ask one person to recall an event from exactly how they remembered it, then asked another person to do the same thing from the same event, do you think their stories would line up perfectly symmetrical? No, probably not, because each person has their own perspective and interpretations of what really happened, and their minds will not focus on the same things. This is what happened in my reviewing of two different editorials, based on one speech. People take away different things from the speech that I chose, “I Have A Dream” by Martin Luther King Jr., because they hear what they want to hear, and see what they want to see. For instance, how I view the speech is different.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What do I need to know?’ We are engaging in reflective thinking to better our understanding and knowledge of a certain problem or a task at hand. This essay will define thinking and components of thinking about thinking with regards to David Hume. Thinking can be defined as the way an individual’s mind can produce ideas, thoughts, memories and decisions where the mind is considered to be the ‘storage unit’ of an individual. Thinking about thinking can be defined as to have a conscious…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Voltaire once said: “History is a lie that most people agree upon.” In order to understand history, historians use a method called “historical thinking.” Historians don’t just look at evidence and learn the facts. Rather, historical thinking is asking so what? Why are these pieces of information important? How can we take the past and relate it to our times? Part of historical thinking is learning about change.…

    • 2124 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On the other hand, if the eye witness is asked questions that lead them to answer in a particular way, the testimony can be faulty. Based on the information that I have found so far, I would say that eye witness testimonies are a valuable way to obtain information, but they should not necessarily be the decided factor of a case. Because there are some flaws with eye witness testimony, they are not always reliable. Equally important in determining the reliability of eye witness testimony is the reconstruction theory of memory. This theory comes from Bartlett (1932), who’s famous study ‘War of the Ghosts’ showed that memory is not like a video tape recording, but we make “effort after meaning”.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The altered memory is now re-encoded as “the real one,” only to be reconstructed with more fabrications during the next recall. (Schiller, 2013) So while memories are based, in part, on what actually happened they are also influenced by current thoughts and emotions. Due to this evidence, many people have built up a skeptical awareness of all memory…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is because they are doing just that: predicting. Precognition is often confused with prediction, yet the two are very different. When you make a prediction, you are using information that you already have to make an inference about what will happen in the future, while precognition is foretelling something which cannot be explained by what we already know (Vongehr). There are tons of other reasons as to why people believe they possess the ability of precognition. In her article on why people believe in extrasensory perception, Sharon Presley states that “misperception of chance events is one of the most powerful psychological phenomena affecting belief in ESP”.…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays