They think that because of these false claims, universities take extra cautions when dealing with sexual assault claims, and are very careful about reporting sexual assault cases to authorities. Many universities use this idea as an excuse for their attitudes towards sexual assault claims. However, this idea is completely false. First of all, there are evidences showing that false claims only take a tiny part of all sexual assault claims (Dick, 2015). So, it should not be an issue for universities to worry about. Second, even if there are some false claims, they should not stop universities from doing their own investigations, and offering supports to sexual assault victims. Right now, many universities have done almost nothing to offer helps to victims. Instead, they try everything to dispel sexual assault claims. The truth is current campus sexual assault policies of many universities are not affected by false claims, but are affected by financial motivations. Both fraternities and college sports bring huge revenues to universities. Today, fraternity has become a huge industry in America. It helps attracting new students to universities. It offers residences to its members, so the universities do no need to worry about issues related to housing. Most importantly, alumnus who are former fraternity members are among the most generous donors (Dick, 2015). College sports are also major income sources for many universities. Having one or two star athletes on the team is very beneficial. Winning games means more incomes and more investments for the universities. For that reason, universities certainly would not want to lose some good players to sex assault claims. Furthermore, a good reputation can attract hundreds of millions of potential donations and investments for universities (Dick, 2015). The universities cannot afford to let those sexual
They think that because of these false claims, universities take extra cautions when dealing with sexual assault claims, and are very careful about reporting sexual assault cases to authorities. Many universities use this idea as an excuse for their attitudes towards sexual assault claims. However, this idea is completely false. First of all, there are evidences showing that false claims only take a tiny part of all sexual assault claims (Dick, 2015). So, it should not be an issue for universities to worry about. Second, even if there are some false claims, they should not stop universities from doing their own investigations, and offering supports to sexual assault victims. Right now, many universities have done almost nothing to offer helps to victims. Instead, they try everything to dispel sexual assault claims. The truth is current campus sexual assault policies of many universities are not affected by false claims, but are affected by financial motivations. Both fraternities and college sports bring huge revenues to universities. Today, fraternity has become a huge industry in America. It helps attracting new students to universities. It offers residences to its members, so the universities do no need to worry about issues related to housing. Most importantly, alumnus who are former fraternity members are among the most generous donors (Dick, 2015). College sports are also major income sources for many universities. Having one or two star athletes on the team is very beneficial. Winning games means more incomes and more investments for the universities. For that reason, universities certainly would not want to lose some good players to sex assault claims. Furthermore, a good reputation can attract hundreds of millions of potential donations and investments for universities (Dick, 2015). The universities cannot afford to let those sexual