The Importance Of F. B. I.

Good Essays
Imagine living in a world where the government had complete control and access to your personal secrets. This world might soon come upon us if we don’t take a stand against the F.B.I. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is convinced that they have the right to forcefully intrude on an individual daily life when they choose. In March of 2016 went against the F.B.I beliefs by sticking to its ideals and protecting individuals rights. Apple did this by refusing to help the F.B.I unlock an iPhone belonging to Syed Farook. In this writing I will focus on the importance of privacy, security, and consumer trust. A world without privacy is a world society will never be ready for. Picture if every thing you did, said, or even thought was made viewable …show more content…
The F.B.I basically wants apple to hand them over a key that gives anyone one ultimate access to any apple device. Can we really trust the government with a key that contains such devastating power? The truth is no one could ever be trusted with such a key especially when it comes to government officials because it would make information easier to obtain for hackers, thieves, and terrorist. In 2012 one of the highest ranked government official Hillary Clinton, leaked thousands of classified federal information during her tenure as United States Secretary of State. This occurred when she used her family 's private email server for official communications, rather than official State Department email accounts maintained on federal servers. Hillary Clinton, a runner up for president of the United States of America failed to not only protect one individual security but a whole nation. Believing that another government official will be able to handle such responsibility is hoping for disaster. Can we even really determine the really reason for wanting Apple to create a key? In 2008 the ACLU said a “Justice’s Office of the Inspector General revealed a systemic, widespread abuse of power. It found serious breaches of department regulations and multiple potential violations of the law relating to the USA patriot act.” They used the patriot act to obtain large amount of private information on

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hacking

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    And my evidence is that only about 51% say that is should be unlocked and about 39% people say that they should not unlocked the phone. But the Apple company is like they should not give the software to the FBI but if they lose the case they will have to unlock the phone. But then the Apple company is have trouble with the FBI but the Apple company has some rules so that they will not unlock the phone. I wonder if the Apple company will still make a updated phone so that the FBI will not get in people phone any more. But I hope the FBI will leave the Apple compon alone and just find some hacker to open it.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I think that Apple needs to think about the bigger picture here. If you are dead you can’t use a phone. Apple keeps saying that creating a back door will put everyone at risk and how the software doesn’t exist that no one has access to that. I look at it this way, there are people who made the security wall for the iPhone. If they know to construct it they know exactly how to deconstruct it.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    James Comey, the FBI director, discussed that this problem should not be solved by a company that sells phones or by an agency that protects citizens but rather by the people their trying to protect. It should be up to the American people to choose what means more to them, security or privacy (Willens, 6). On the contrary, Apple believes that creating a back door could potentially cause the FBI to use that backdoor for evil. They would be allowed into anyone’s iPhone whether they were allowed to or not. Also, they could allow spyware onto users phones at any time.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As stated before, Apple 's best interest is to look out for their customers and the FBI has spent more time over simplifying the truth. The FBI handles their issues much more differently than Apple does, they claim that they only want one piece of software from Apple but later they will undeniably ask for more. Furthermore, according to source G, a similar case to that is the one of Lavabit, when the founder Ladar Levison had to install a pen to obtain the metadata which eventually resulted in his company shutting down. However the FBI demanded for Levison’s company encryption key, the same is likely to happen to Apple if they create the operating system. The FBI operates so they can get whatever they need from a company, whether it 's an encryption key or any additional needed information, they fail to keep in mind that these demands will deteriorate a majority of these companies customer’s privacy.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Apple prides itself as having the strongest security system against brute force attacks on their devices because of their signature software. This reputation of Apple’s has helped the company become the global leader in smart phone device distribution. The government is asking Apple to place firmware on the phones disabling the latest erase data feature so they can brute force the phone. Essentially, the FBI is asking Apple to hack their own customers. [11] If customers find out about this sabotage they will stop updating their phone and either way the customer lose because they become prone to attacks with outdated protection.…

    • 2258 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If I support the FBI’s point of view, then it will be like I am creating a privacy and a public safety issue for myself as I myself have an iPhone. If I support the point of view of Tim Cook, Apple’s CEO, then it means that the terrorist activities will not get solved, which is threatening sign to…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is where the example of Google Wallet vs ISIS comes in. In the past, Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile all blocked Google Wallet from their phones because they were backing ISIS Mobile Wallet. Bringing this up not only gives viewers an example of ISPs taking advantage of their power, something they will easily be able to do without net neutrality, but it also connects these companies with ISIS in the viewers’ minds. He hopes this association, albeit not with the terrorist organization ISIS, will cause the viewers to view these companies in a bad…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    14 citizens were killed due to the shooting, yet Apple wouldn’t decide to help the FBI. Apple is looked at as a bully, and denying the request from the FBI has started a small war about human rights. People only fear that creating a method to obtain data would fall into the wrong hands, however, with highly specialized encryption every phone user could become a potential threat. We pledge allegiance to our country for security, and honor a code to help the government protect the people. With the FBI being professional, Apple could develop a technique that could be shared to enhance personal security while balancing private security.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Iphones, Inc. Case Study

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The previous judges in the cases have expressed that code can be considered a form of speech. What the FBI wants Apple to do is write a new code, which is considered a form of speech. It violates the First Amendment rights as forcing speech and going against Apples interests. Gross also continues by saying that Apple is also arguing that this should not be forced upon them because the FBI has not proven that useful information will be found on the phone, it has only been speculated. According to Gross, “The Fifth Amendment protects U.S. residents against the government taking away their liberty” (Gross).…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Apple was resilient against the federal government for the protection of their users. The FBI unlawful overstepped boundaries as a government official. Vivek Wadhwa was quoted in “Apple-FBI battle over San Bernardino terror attack investigation: All the details” saying “Apple is obstructing law enforcement’s [investigation] and effectively aiding terrorists [since] they changed [their] technology” to purposely limit the access of the FBI. Apple has the right to change their intellectual property. Apple was enhancing their security to meet the growing demands of their users and to protect their information.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays