What´s Political Correctness Objective?

Improved Essays
Hey, you can’t say that. The Oxford Living Dictionaries defines political correctness as “The avoidance of forms of expression or action that are perceived to exclude, marginalize, or insult groups of people who are socially disadvantaged or discriminated against (Oxford University Press).” While it is all well and good to do our best not to offend others, it becomes a problem when we start to censor the truth, or worse alter it to fit our view point or “group of the moment.” Political correctness is not freedom of speech but rather could suppress potential truths, obliterate historical facts, and has the unfortunate tendency to be subjective. Political correctness is a rash and unreasonable way to make others respect the people around them. Putting such restraint on our freedom of speech, which is the right to speak what a person believes, is causing many people to miss the real point. People tend …show more content…
While one person may perceive a fact as being offensive, another individual may see it as harmless. This is the same concept as political correctness. For example, when I was working in Food Lion I said Merry Christmas during the holiday season. A certain customer did not like that I had said Merry Christmas instead of Happy Holidays but to me I didn’t do anything wrong. Which is why it is difficult to define what is correct because every individual has their own perception of what reality is. In a world with so many varying opinions and viewpoints, it remains virtually impossible to please everyone. There are some benefits to political correctness. It can open people’s eyes to issues they may have become blind to or may have been taught that this is just the way things are such as the suppression of African Americans. However, being politically correct is far different from giving respect to other. Instead of being able to rationalize in a reasonable way we have pushed for the extreme of only one

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Recently, political correctness has swept into the forefront of modern day culture. The term has come to mean a variety of things, but at its core is an idea that words and actions should not offend or make anyone uncomfortable. However, South Park has managed to remain strong to its roots by still being inflammatory and offensive with the series continuing to draw heaps of criticism from many different groups. While South Park may not conform to what polite society expects, it manages to provide biting satire and commentary. Marcus Schulzke argues in “South Park and the Transformation of Meaning” that a hateful word’s meaning can be changed over time which can be seen in “The F-Word” in which the boys call a group of loud bikers “fags” as they try to get them to leave town (2012).…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Berry, David. “How South Park Pokes Fun at Political Correctness Without Being Dismissive.” The National Post. Nationalpost, 5 Oct. 2015. Web.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article, “The Coddling of the American Mind” is written by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt and published on the website www.theatlantic.com. In the article, the authors discuss the increasing popularity of political correctness in the classroom. It is very easy to tell that the authors are against the heavy usage of trigger warnings. Based on the authors backgrounds and the nature of the website, it can be determined that this is a credible source of information.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Freedom of expression is a uniquely American tradition, at least to the extent we have here. Amy Witherbee, a researcher who studies how democracy and censorship go hand and hand said “At the core of censorship is always a parallel belief in the ability of an idea to alter lives and change nations. The challenge is to let those ideas wreak their havoc, and trust in our capacity as the citizens of a democracy to make of the damage something better than what was there before. If, on the other hand, we close down the arguments, retract the controversies, and avoid the challenges, then what we have is not a real democracy, but a nation afraid to lead itself” (Witherbee Par. 12). The First amendment is in place to protect citizens from censorship.…

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The last thing you want to do is offend someone because of their beliefs, their faith, race, sex, gender, or anything. The public is becoming more aware of this as several media outlets have taken to using what they call “politically correct” terms. Terms that when used in discussions about sensitive topics, will hopefully not rub anybody the wrong way. At least, that’s what they want you to believe. Many Americans disagree with the notion that you have to speak in a “politically correct” fashion.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marcus Gravey, an early 20th century American Political leader, once stated “A people without the knowledge of their past history, origin and culture is like a tree without roots. “ For any group of people to be successful, it is imperative that they understand where they once came from. Many precentors in our class captured the essence and importance created by the specific culture they studied. There are numerous amounts of cultures that all interact and intermingle in many different ways that make up the country we live in today.…

    • 2507 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom of speech is something that has been long instilled in the minds of Americans. Some seem to suppose they have complete freedom of that right, however, there are rules and restrictions. Many are not aware of these limitations and are not aware of just how many our world possesses. Some countries have more restrictions than others, but overall there are some phrases that are against the law to use, for example, shouting “fire” in a theater full of people (Turley 160).…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Everyone First Education Nowadays, being political correct is a status nobody can achieve, with the amount of triggers, safe spaces, and cultural appropriation set by social justice warriors. A liberally educated person, as described by William Cronon article Only Connect… strives to achieve this status in their everyday life; they are scholars with a well-rounded knowledge base who have learned to connect with all groups of people. Having learned to avoid conforming to prejudices by basing their judgements off of personal experiences, liberally educated people have nondiscriminating open minds. It is necessary for professors at a liberal education schools to encourage the use of inclusive language in order to further the goals of reforming…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For years now, people have tried to be more “politically correct” in everything they say or do. “Political correctness,” I have observed does not only pose problems for those in the majority but for the minorities as well. While on the surface this seems to be just a way of being considerate and kind to fellow human beings, I believe it is actually hurting society as a whole. When majority members cannot speak candidly, members of under-represented groups also suffer. What it results in is that no one, even the minorities it tries to protect, can discuss their concerns about fairness and fears without falling into the negative stereotypes.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom of speech is both right and privilege that we can neither take it for granted nor back away. It’s important to find a middle ground where we can hear one another, where we can debate and disagree with respect. People in America have learn that is good to have an opinion and that you opinion…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People who agree with the creation of speech laws simply do not have a proper sense of American freedoms. Americans are often touted as being ignorant and blunt in some regards, but at least we have a very strong cultural foundation in freedom of speech unlike some countries in Europe who have very strong hate speech laws that could land them in jail if they say something that is deemed as offensive. These countries will ultimately come to realize the problems with these laws and the people living within these countries will yearn for such beautiful freedoms that our constitution provides us. Therefore, it is clear to see why our society should take this topic very seriously, and we should not cooperate with anyone who try’s to limit our freedom of expression in anyway whatsoever, and if people don’t respect that than they have the right to form an argument against it, because their right to free speech is…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The answer depends upon what you mean by "right to offend." Do you mean that one has to be allowed (without repercussion) to use expressions deemed offensive? Or do you mean "is it morally permissible to offend someone"? It seems that anymore, people can be "offended" by just about anything - sports team names, logos and mascots, religious imagery, political statements or cartoons ...…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Further examples such as fireman, changed to the acceptable name as firefighter, since it would be sexual discrimination to say men only, fight fires. The list goes on and on, as do the ways in which people are offended in this country. But how did this happen? This way of thinking originates back to world war one, but primarily on college campuses. However, political-correctness has proliferated to an insane degree starting in the nineties that corrupts foundational components of the United States.…

    • 1854 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary of “In Defense of Prejudice” In the United States, it can be seen almost anywhere that societies are becoming more and more conscious of the words they use to describe people, in the case of accidentally offending someone. However, when some words are determined as being “hate-speech” and are deemed criminal, the notion of free speech begins to be altered. With certain words now being treated as legitimate violence against another, where does one draw the line when considering one’s constitutional right to free speech, even when that person is obviously prejudiced? In Jonathan Rauch’s essay, “In Defense of Prejudice”, he argues that instead of eradicating all forms of prejudice in the United States,…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political Correctness makes it more difficult to speak publicly. One example of political correctness gone too far occurred in California;…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays