Equality Of Opportunity Essay

Great Essays
Political contestation is triggered by our human desire to make a sense of the complex reality, in which we live in trough conceptualization, therefore it cannot be the same for every political thinker considering we come from a multitude of backgrounds and experiences. Political debate over concepts is a strenuous ideological and theoretical dispute over the use of concepts, the reason why they are so challenged, is contested itself. This essay will identify the main factors that contribute in an extent to this result. In doing so, I will reference to the various dimensions and principles that form the core of egalitarianism, emphasizing on the aspects of equality of opportunity and outcome to present a coherent argument: dominant scholars …show more content…
As John Rawl argues there is need for a further step to guarantee a fairer competition. Advantaged positions should be effectively and not formally open to everyone, regardless of any background, and especially not only to people with special talents, but to the ones willing to use them. "Inequalities are justified only if needed to improve the lot of the worst off, for example by giving the talented an incentive to create wealth.” According Rawl, it is not always a fair competition because some people get a further advantage, before even get to the competition (e.g. better education, healthcare, parenting or neighbourhood). Placing an accent on high quality education: as it can be easily deducted Rawl is an advocate for a midway between equality of opportunity and equality of outcome, more leaning on equality of opportunity because he fully recognises the importance of a society without barriers and discrimination but at the same time sees the problem in assuming that we are equal before “the race” and have the same importance. (Rawls,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Using the first principle of justice, the laws that are based off the “general will” will always promote the security and freedom of individuals intact. Due to the emphasis on promoting freedom and equality, the ideal society would fall under Rawls’ determination of fairness under the first principle of justice. Rawls puts an emphasis on equal liberties and Rousseau’s society is focused on equality of all individuals. In that society, individuals have social liberties similar to those Rawls emphasizes. “The social compact creates an equality among the citizens so that they all commit to the same conditions and should all have the same rights.” (Rousseau 108).…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both utilitarianism and democracy share similar ideals such as equality, cooperation, unity, and freedom. While utilitarianism seemingly implies that people can do what they want as long as their actions increase happiness, from higher pleasures, for the greatest amount of people and do not violate the rights of others based on the ideals, this is not true. Utilitarianism does not deal in absolutes. As Mill states if society needs to deny a certain right to avoid unhappiness, then they can. The government has the authority to deny rights if it is for the protection of happiness for the greatest amount of people.…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, taking wealth away from people only benefits the less fortunate. As both philosophers point out, justice is the most important political value and applies to the basic institutions of society such as institutions that regulate the market, property, family, freedom, and so on. If society is a matter of cooperation between equals for mutual advantage, the conditions for this cooperation need to be defended and any inequalities in social positions must be…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tocqueville thought the greater good should be upheld alongside, or before individualism. Mill’s ideal citizen is more likely than Tocqueville’s ideal citizen. Mainly because humans are inherently selfish. In a democracy, citizens do care for their fellow man, however it is not likely to find an individual to put aside their individual goals, to help achieve society’s goals. They may help society as a whole, next to achieving their individual goals, yet their individual goals would be higher on their priorities.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rawl's Theory Of Justice

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The paradox (es) rises around the question of applicability of Original Position and situations when the OP is activated: Nagel and Dworkin critique and attack Rawl’s original position and they provide us with important justifications against it. As we will see, both these philosophers’ arguments will prove to be significant for a rejection of Rawl’s proposal. Furthermore, there is the questionability of either justice as fairness is a moral comprehensive doctrine or not. What is it if it is not a moral comprehensive doctrine? How exactly should we understand…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A tension in the argument where Perry comes in is Rorty’s assertion of sentiment, security, and moral progress. Those components, specifically sentiment, definitely help progress humanity, but they cannot bring about total respect for human rights. Perry believes Rorty’s argument is very Eurocentric in nature. Rorty’s ideas can be interpreted that poor people cannot be moral and that there must be financial security to have morality. People who have more are more moral, like the West and Europe, and that makes them better than everyone else.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To achieve a just society we have to reason together about the meaning of the good life, and to create a public culture, hospitable to the disagreements that will inevitably arise.” (Sandel pg. 261) An argument of maximizing utility and welfare or simply respecting the freedom of choice from the utilitarian or libertarian view is an argument that does not address their shortcomings. “Justice is not only about the right way to distribute things. It is also about the right way to value things.” (Sandel pg. 261) Equality and liberty are something that we see as the same things.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Yet Taylor sees this competitiveness as healthy and that one good should not retrocede to another through repression or elimination. However, it’s within this framework that the stronger goods of superior qualitative distinction will emerge. Of larger significance and hierarchical necessity are Taylor’s concept of “hypergoods”. These are also the goods of which one is most desirous and passionate towards as they represent the core of one’s identity. It is against these hypergoods that all other goods are judged, contrasted, and considered.…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liberty And Equality

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Liberty and equality are two of the most important principles in politics, as they are part of the foundation of our society. Equality and freedom have generally been portrayed as two conflicting concepts, mainly because in order to achieve equality redistribution of resources is necessary and this would inevitably interfere with the liberty of those who have an abundance of resources and wealth. However, after a closer examination we can see that in many cases an increase in equality results in an increase in freedom as well. The negative and positive explanations of freedom imply that inequality can actually be a restraint of freedom because it limits one 's autonomy. In addition, the distinction between individual and social liberty can…

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, these negative influences are broken down into two types of barriers, which include internal and external sources. Defining Internal Barriers Now, you have a greater cognizance of what binds people from being proficient critical thinkers. However, what exactly, are internal barriers? "“Internal” will refer to barriers that originate from within you," (Ridel, 2015, p. 27). These obstacles that stem from inside ourselves, require that we learn to decipher what falls under this category, followed by modification of said barriers in which you particularly struggle with.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays