Influence of power can be well exemplified when looking through classical, modern and organizational environment lenses where organizations are assumed to fulfil the desired goals that they set to achieve. This view constructs the idea that organizations are deemed to be ‘rational institutions’. The organizational goals would be set by individuals in a position of formal authority. With these thought disciplines, the critical questions revolving organisational theory would be how to effectively design and sustain an organization so they can achieve their declared purposes to the best of their ability. However, participants and further employees associated with an organization are challenged by having their personal preferences restrained by a formulation of formal rules and social norms of a rational environment (Wolfinger, 1960). For example, if an employee was directed to perform an organizational task with a few external constraints, the individual itself will be likely to discover intrinsic satisfaction when accomplishing the certain task. In my experience, I feel as though being less constrained is evident through participating in sport activities, as the whole social environment of a sports team focuses more on the ‘having fun’ aspect rather than just ‘winning’ a game. If the team environment had just focused on social involvement and support, then the intrinsic satisfaction that I would have discovered is a sense of belonging and connectedness. However, if an employee had been loaded with external justifications in the process of achieving an organizational task, the individual itself would tend to lose interest and satisfaction when performing the task, and a major factor that may have contributed to a
Influence of power can be well exemplified when looking through classical, modern and organizational environment lenses where organizations are assumed to fulfil the desired goals that they set to achieve. This view constructs the idea that organizations are deemed to be ‘rational institutions’. The organizational goals would be set by individuals in a position of formal authority. With these thought disciplines, the critical questions revolving organisational theory would be how to effectively design and sustain an organization so they can achieve their declared purposes to the best of their ability. However, participants and further employees associated with an organization are challenged by having their personal preferences restrained by a formulation of formal rules and social norms of a rational environment (Wolfinger, 1960). For example, if an employee was directed to perform an organizational task with a few external constraints, the individual itself will be likely to discover intrinsic satisfaction when accomplishing the certain task. In my experience, I feel as though being less constrained is evident through participating in sport activities, as the whole social environment of a sports team focuses more on the ‘having fun’ aspect rather than just ‘winning’ a game. If the team environment had just focused on social involvement and support, then the intrinsic satisfaction that I would have discovered is a sense of belonging and connectedness. However, if an employee had been loaded with external justifications in the process of achieving an organizational task, the individual itself would tend to lose interest and satisfaction when performing the task, and a major factor that may have contributed to a