It’s common knowledge that life isn’t worth living, anyhow (The Stranger,121).
His belief that life is meaningless allows him behave immorally and to accept his death without feeling any remorse. Right before Meursault dies, he says,
I opened myself for the first time to the tender indifference of the world (The Stranger, 129)
A poetic line that reinforces the idea that Meursault’s nihilism causes his amorality and disregard for his own life by reminding himself that life does not care about people either. Jean-Baptiste Clamence, the main character of The Fall, is a philosophical absurdist who believes he has found the goal or meaning of life; however, he accepts that this goal is ultimately worthless because life has no intrinsic …show more content…
So as with arrive at as much goals, Clamence claims to a chance to be lesson in place should persuade that others find him that he is a virtuous man, however, this will be best a façade which furthermore doesn't of him of much accurate self. He can't finish his objective to achieve what he wants as he refuses to be genuinely moral; instead, he believes that he will for sure succeed if he is immoral. This may be not true, since Clamence might have succeeded if he had attempted his hardest to remain moral. This is the reason he falls hard because he knows he need not attempted as much hard to remain moral, also he did not save a suicidal-woman, and his entire life became a trick to persuade others to imagine that he is something which he is not. Therefore, both Meursault and Clamence take after philosophical schools for thought that deny those presence from claiming that the life has any meaning, and both of them behave immorally to the end of the novel. We can't say that these two writings indisputably substantiate that nihilism and absurdism prompt amorality, it will be sensible should infer that ethical quality may be important, in any case of a person’s school of thought. On Meursault needed behaved morally, he might not need been sent of the guillotine for murder. If Clamence required behaved morally, he might be stayed back in Paris and tried to proceed in attempting to win the great judgment from claiming the individuals around him. However, both characters provide for up ethical quality when they provide for up the idea of a intending on
His belief that life is meaningless allows him behave immorally and to accept his death without feeling any remorse. Right before Meursault dies, he says,
I opened myself for the first time to the tender indifference of the world (The Stranger, 129)
A poetic line that reinforces the idea that Meursault’s nihilism causes his amorality and disregard for his own life by reminding himself that life does not care about people either. Jean-Baptiste Clamence, the main character of The Fall, is a philosophical absurdist who believes he has found the goal or meaning of life; however, he accepts that this goal is ultimately worthless because life has no intrinsic …show more content…
So as with arrive at as much goals, Clamence claims to a chance to be lesson in place should persuade that others find him that he is a virtuous man, however, this will be best a façade which furthermore doesn't of him of much accurate self. He can't finish his objective to achieve what he wants as he refuses to be genuinely moral; instead, he believes that he will for sure succeed if he is immoral. This may be not true, since Clamence might have succeeded if he had attempted his hardest to remain moral. This is the reason he falls hard because he knows he need not attempted as much hard to remain moral, also he did not save a suicidal-woman, and his entire life became a trick to persuade others to imagine that he is something which he is not. Therefore, both Meursault and Clamence take after philosophical schools for thought that deny those presence from claiming that the life has any meaning, and both of them behave immorally to the end of the novel. We can't say that these two writings indisputably substantiate that nihilism and absurdism prompt amorality, it will be sensible should infer that ethical quality may be important, in any case of a person’s school of thought. On Meursault needed behaved morally, he might not need been sent of the guillotine for murder. If Clamence required behaved morally, he might be stayed back in Paris and tried to proceed in attempting to win the great judgment from claiming the individuals around him. However, both characters provide for up ethical quality when they provide for up the idea of a intending on