A commonly held assumption is that children are bound to be very similar to their parents. While there is some truth in this, scientific research shows that genetic considerations do not entirely determine outcomes for individual development. From week 4 all the way to week 6 we have been reading different articles in regards to the different levels of contributions and influences that nature and nurturing have on individual development. Comprehensive clinical studies show that adverse conditions in early life can severely impact the developing brain and increase vulnerability to mood disorders later in life" (Murgatroyd, & Spengler, 2011). Both of these references that were provided from my observations are clear indications of the importance
…show more content…
There has always been a debate between various psychologist, scientists and philosophers on their own interpretation of how nature vs nature arose concerning human development. In the nature vs nurture debate help by these professionals, the term nature refers to the genes we inherit while the term nurture refers to our outside environment. This to me makes for a valid argument because each one of these have its own contribution to social change. Human development is the scientific study of age-related changes in behavior, thinking, and emotions and personality Breedlove, S. M., Watson, N. V., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (2013). And in order to understand cognitive, emotional, physical and social and education growth that everyone experiences from childhood to adulthood, we have to understand every aspect of human development and how it has benefited different people. One example I have observed is understanding childhood development. Different psychologists have different theories surrounding child development and the majority of them often use stage by stage approach while attempting to describe the areas of …show more content…
We meet a lot of people from different walks of life that are of various outlooks, personality traits, behaviors, thinking patterns and personality. These variations are explained through theories, arguments and discussions. Freud’s Psychosexual Theory focuses on the spectrum of nature, Erikson’s Psychosocial Theory focuses on the influence of nature and Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory emphasizes on the importance of both nature and nurture in the process of human development. Although different psychologist and philosophers have different views on how behavior, thinking, emotions and personality are formed, none of these theories are labelled as correct or incorrect. However, people are at the mercy of neither their genes nor their environment when they actively construct optimal experiences. My resolution to this debate would be to continue to provide solid information and documentation to support what your opinion is about both topics. One thing that I have observed in science that there are never no wrong or right answer however looking at it from a psychological perspective a individuals behavior can tell you a lot about what they may have experienced. All in all being able to provide documentation and support it with solid information would allow you to be able to figure out a solution for this
There has always been a debate between various psychologist, scientists and philosophers on their own interpretation of how nature vs nature arose concerning human development. In the nature vs nurture debate help by these professionals, the term nature refers to the genes we inherit while the term nurture refers to our outside environment. This to me makes for a valid argument because each one of these have its own contribution to social change. Human development is the scientific study of age-related changes in behavior, thinking, and emotions and personality Breedlove, S. M., Watson, N. V., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (2013). And in order to understand cognitive, emotional, physical and social and education growth that everyone experiences from childhood to adulthood, we have to understand every aspect of human development and how it has benefited different people. One example I have observed is understanding childhood development. Different psychologists have different theories surrounding child development and the majority of them often use stage by stage approach while attempting to describe the areas of …show more content…
We meet a lot of people from different walks of life that are of various outlooks, personality traits, behaviors, thinking patterns and personality. These variations are explained through theories, arguments and discussions. Freud’s Psychosexual Theory focuses on the spectrum of nature, Erikson’s Psychosocial Theory focuses on the influence of nature and Piaget’s Cognitive Development Theory emphasizes on the importance of both nature and nurture in the process of human development. Although different psychologist and philosophers have different views on how behavior, thinking, emotions and personality are formed, none of these theories are labelled as correct or incorrect. However, people are at the mercy of neither their genes nor their environment when they actively construct optimal experiences. My resolution to this debate would be to continue to provide solid information and documentation to support what your opinion is about both topics. One thing that I have observed in science that there are never no wrong or right answer however looking at it from a psychological perspective a individuals behavior can tell you a lot about what they may have experienced. All in all being able to provide documentation and support it with solid information would allow you to be able to figure out a solution for this