NASA Pros And Cons

Superior Essays
Reinvigorating NASA with more money will inspire kids in classrooms all around the United States. They will look up to the heroes who were able to step foot on a different planet. Equivalently, to students who grew up in the late 60’s and 70’s when the US first landed on the moon. Scott Grillo (2011) comments in a USA Today piece about how fortunate he is being a kid during the time of the Apollo programs. He explains how inspiring it was seeing the frontier of possible be pushed, and how it encouraged him to pursue a masters in chemistry and have a career in aviation (Grillo, 2011). This is an effect NASA has that is not able to be measured in graphs or data points, but in lives changed and career paths altered. Having students look up …show more content…
There is really not one specific group that wholeheartedly opposes NASA. More Republicans tend to vote to cut NASA’s budget than Democrats, but support comes from both sides. This is not a politically polarizing controversy, unlike most. But many people do oppose doubling NASA’s budget, since it has not happened yet. Most supporters of cutting funding to NASA argue that the US cannot afford space exploration at this point. They use a pathos argument because they will point to kids in poverty or people starving and argue that the US needs to focus on them not space. This tugs on the heartstrings of compassionate citizens all across the United States. Doubling NASA’s budget requires money, which has to be allocated from somewhere, a drawback to the proposed solution. DeGroot (2012) wrote an article for Galegroup, in which he asked the question so what in response to China on path to put a man on Mars (DeGroot, 2012, p.1). He claims “The time has come to pull the plug on meaningless gestures in space”, stating that the missions are tremendously expensive (DeGroot, 2012, p.1). The argument is trying to make the point that NASA has no real benefit for what it does. This is a very common counter-argument that is presented daily. However, what these people fail to consider are the economic and inspirational benefits NASA provides that I have explained above. To respond to the point that the US cannot afford NASA, Neil deGrasse Tyson points out in an interview with Bill Maher that, all of NASA’s costs to this point are less than the bank bailout TARP (Nusca, 2011). TARP was an $850 billion bailout in 2008 signed by George Bush. Those funds used to bail out bankers, who made mistakes and purposely doomed people, has been greater than all the funds we have used for NASA. The issue with the argument that the US cannot afford NASA, is that they can

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Most naysayers of manned space travel focus heavily on the danger to the astronauts and the massive amount of resources that are supposebly wasted in space. Some argue against government funded space programs while others argue against space travel in general, but all say they have good reason. Space travel is expensive, many people say that we could use this money to fix many of the world 's problems such as hunger and poverty. This is a very good rebuttal to space exploration as the problems with poverty are very important. Yet the amount of money that could potentially be made with space technology such as asteroid mining would help these problems far more than just redirecting current funds out of space.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Space travel not only will cost a lot of money, but some people struggle to earn money, so it would be incredibly unfair to take the money off of people’s taxes. According to the text “Future of Space Exploration Could See Humans on Mars, Alien Planets” by Nola Taylor Redd, she explains how some people object using…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Expand Space Exploration

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Is it safe to expand space exploration? In the US today there is debate about whether or not space exploration should be continued and further more into space. Though some people believe increasing it is not wise because it 's dangerous, the United States should increase space exploration because we can learn more, make better technology and gain a lot of money. Some people believe that manned missions of space explorations are far too dangerous and it’s too expensive. “Space contains the most leading deaths out of the 439 people who have flown on space flights, twenty-two have died.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This can be blamed on a paucity of revenue flow. Critics opposing space exploration will argue that this funding from the government damages the economy. When in fact, without these businesses, the economy is in a worse state. In 2012, the NASA budget took a 20% blow to the planetary science programs, crippling all of NASA’s projects relating to the study of other planets (Planetary exploration hit). Not only did this approved cut from congress slash the department upwards of $300 million, but also the planetary science program…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of NASA

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The downside is that the little training that the passengers will receive compared to trained astronauts, will not prepare them if any malfunctions or even fatal results are to occur. Even if no lives were seriously injured, billion dollar lawsuits are bound to happen, which could weaken or possibly destroy the space industry as a whole. Another problem with this statement is that private agencies tend to over-promise a lot of the time. Mars One, a non-profit organization, is currently the leader in pursuing the long-awaited trip to the red planet, Mars. In their first press release about this project, Mars One stated that they hope to establish a human settlement on Mars by the year 2023, which later changed to 2025(Mars One Will Settle Men on Mars in 2023 1).…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    NASA Budget Essay

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages

    By 1972, it’s budget was cut to 3.4 billion dollars. (“NASA’s Shuttle”). This loss of 2.5 billion dollars of their budget comes at a great cost when NASA tries to pay for multiple missions and taxpayers are reluctant to give more funds. In fact, “It wasn’t the space shuttle that was preventing us from exploring further,” said space history expert Robert Pearlman, “It was the lack of political will to give NASA more money.” (“NASA’s Shuttle”). The company is forced to make sacrifices when it comes to money.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    People are outraged by the amount of time, effort and funds invested to gain insufficient information, which appears to be useless for our planet, should the space program be defunded? Instead of fruitless endeavors like finding out if there are extraterrestrial lives in Mars. We should be deeply focusing on society; finding better ways to power humanity’s desire for energy and feeding the starving population around the globe. Alternatively, space exploration is a desire and if we put desire before our needs our society will not appear as developed as the the government has promoted it to be. For instance, “NASA’s FY 2011 budget of $17.5 billion to fund new science mission, ground flying telescope.” After all, what useful information have we been giving to provide evidence for life elsewhere in the universe.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Space: The Final Frontier of Profit?” Dinerman provides a lot of numbers that signal the almost guaranteed doom of any private sector space research program. His evidence behind his claim that “the private sector is simply not up for the job” is supported on the surface by failures of recent programs under usually successful companies including Lockheed Martin, Beal Aerospace and Kistler Aerospace. Like the hardware they constructed, most of these companies ended up going down in flames under the burden of costs they thought they could handle. Dinerman also cites that many of these programs try to make the cut by “relying on U.S. Government Small Business Innovation Research contracts”, however the failures of these companies even with this type of government aid begins to hint at Dinerman’s true point. The point being that the private sector can not handle the cost of space research with or without the government’s aid, because our governments split party nature will never be decided enough to maintain a program long enough for it to…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is argued that spending money on space programs is not right when it could be spent on underdeveloped nations and poverty. The answer to the question of whether benefits outweigh the costs of space exploration is not so straightforward as it would seem. While it does cost a considerable amount of money it also provides thousands of jobs and encourages the study of the field of science and engineering. Without this specific field of science and engineering the economy could be effected in a negative way from to the loss of so many…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This so called “evolutionary stage” must be stopped as it will start a new arms race, costing countries unbelievable amounts of money. It would also threaten our planet and the usability of space (Critical Issues). The militarization of space also does not have much support of citizens in the United States. Many people believe that warfare in space will only be our next stage in evolution, but we cannot allow this to happen as it will start a new arms race. To date, no countries have put weaponry but many experts agree that many countries have the money to do so and also have the knowledge to do so (Militarizing Space).…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays