The question of the next couple of decades is privacy that important. Since 9/11 security has been a huge deal for our nation. Due to the more recent terrorist attacks the government has stepped up their game. With wiretap abilities, drones, and surveillance to name a few. All of these things do violate our privacy, but protect us little by little. We rather have our rights violated than our country overran by terrorist.
The stats say that we as Americans will certainly have more protection that privacy. “New poll numbers show about two-thirds of people believe it is more important for the federal government to investigate possible terror threats than to avoid intruding on personal privacy.” (Whittaker, Zero Day) In more recent event in San …show more content…
The answer is yes we can but how much privacy are will to give for security. "security and privacy are not on the opposite ends of the seesaw; you don’t accept more to give up less of the other"(schiener). "It wasn’t a surprise that we choose security over privacy in a recent 51 to 29 pool"(schiener). Obviously since 9/11 security everywhere In the USA has been tighter. From sky Marshalls to data roamers to wire tapping have been added to the arsenal of the government. "Its obvious that security is more important its important for survival. Not for people but for every living thing"(sheiner). For success in anything security needs to be one of the top priorities. Security is the legitimate key to success its how we live our lives everyday wither we know it or not. Its transparent that we need security in our life because we cant function with out it. We wouldn’t know when its safe so why is this even a question. Privacy is a right, security is something we pay(taxes) for. Something we must need to survive its like leaving your door unlocked at night. Not knowing what is going to happen our families. So privacy spoiled the world or at least America, let the government do what it needs to do to keep our country safe. They should do the job with out the complaints of our privacy been violated or exploited. the question is now can we trust the government with our most valuable
The stats say that we as Americans will certainly have more protection that privacy. “New poll numbers show about two-thirds of people believe it is more important for the federal government to investigate possible terror threats than to avoid intruding on personal privacy.” (Whittaker, Zero Day) In more recent event in San …show more content…
The answer is yes we can but how much privacy are will to give for security. "security and privacy are not on the opposite ends of the seesaw; you don’t accept more to give up less of the other"(schiener). "It wasn’t a surprise that we choose security over privacy in a recent 51 to 29 pool"(schiener). Obviously since 9/11 security everywhere In the USA has been tighter. From sky Marshalls to data roamers to wire tapping have been added to the arsenal of the government. "Its obvious that security is more important its important for survival. Not for people but for every living thing"(sheiner). For success in anything security needs to be one of the top priorities. Security is the legitimate key to success its how we live our lives everyday wither we know it or not. Its transparent that we need security in our life because we cant function with out it. We wouldn’t know when its safe so why is this even a question. Privacy is a right, security is something we pay(taxes) for. Something we must need to survive its like leaving your door unlocked at night. Not knowing what is going to happen our families. So privacy spoiled the world or at least America, let the government do what it needs to do to keep our country safe. They should do the job with out the complaints of our privacy been violated or exploited. the question is now can we trust the government with our most valuable