Moral Decision Making Research Paper

Improved Essays
The Decision We make decisions on moral dilemmas throughout our whole lives whether they are big decisions or small ones, they have significant impacts in our everyday lives. Oxford Dictionary defines a moral dilemma as, “A situation in which a difficult choice has to be made between two courses of action, either of which entails transgressing a moral principle”. Moral dilemmas are sometimes very hard on which one someone should choose, because although one decision may benefit the person making the decision it could also have horrific consequences for another person. When making a moral decision it is all based on what a person believes is the right thing and what is the wrong thing to do. When making the decision a person has to look at …show more content…
Although, it would not be right to torture another human being I would to protect the thousands of people he is going to kill. I would torture the bomber to get the locations because although I am torturing him, he does not have to die if I do not then thousands of people will because of him. When put in these positions the person making the decision has to think of the greater good for everyone. Also, I would not physically torture the bomber I would use psychological torture, because it would weaken his mind and make it more likely for him to tell all the locations of the bombs. Would you torture the innocent wife of the bomber to get the answers of where the bombs are planted? No, it is not morally right to torture an innocent person just because their significant other did something terrible. Torturing his wife would not be justifiable because she has done nothing wrong she did not know about the bombs or what her husband was doing. If anything, I would ask the wife to help me get her husband to tell me where the bomb locations are at by having her pretend that she is being tortured to trick the bomber and make him agree to tell us the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the article The Ticking Time Bomb, Dershowitz tries to justify the use of non-lethal torture in-order to protect destruction. For instance, when a terrorist who has planted bombs is captured and they do not reveal about their terror plots during interrogation; the use of non-lethal torture such as putting a needle under the fingernails is justifiable as it will help to save hundreds of lives. For example, if a dog is suffering from a disease and, there is no way of giving anesthesia to the dog, then we would have to resort to torture such as closing down its mouth forcefully in order to vaccinate or operate the dog. Even though torture looks inhumane, sometimes the use of torture is justifiable such as in the ticking time bomb scene as the…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When hearing about torture, whether on the news or in an article, we as Americans do not consider the lasting effects it has on people. Physical and psychological torture is mainly employed as war tactics, to get information out of people. Torture is not a concept that is talked about on a day to day basis, because of the many freedoms we experience as Americans. In the article The Case for Torture, Michael Levin portrays torture as something that should be permissible.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torturing suspects or criminals is a very hot issue in the United States. There are many arguments between should the US officials torture terrorists when interrogating them. Michael Levin says he agrees on torturing terrorists for information in his essay, “The Case for Torture”. He addresses his arguments by giving a few hypothetical scenarios of terrorist attacks. One of the examples is, when there is an atomic bomb in Manhattan which is going to explode very soon, the US got the guy who planted it and need to get the location of the bomb and method to disarm it.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Finally, I believe only God has the power to do the right justice to those terrorists. So who are we to judge? My first reason why I believe terrorists do not deserve to be tortured is that they might be forced into it. They could be a part of a hierarchy that has control over them.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture as an Anti-Terrorist Strategy In 2005, the Detainee Treatment act was passed, which banned the military from engaging in torture as well as requiring the International Committee of the Red Cross to have access to prisoners being held by the U.S. government. In June of 2015, Senate voted to expand this law to prevent the military and all other government agencies from using torture during interrogations of prisoners, codifying a ban President Barack Obama issued by executive order shortly after he was sworn in. The use of torture has been a hot topic for the past several years, mainly because of its use by the Bush administration and the intelligence gained through torture eventually leading us to finding Osama Bin Laden. Many try…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marcia Baron and Alan Dershowitz both have different views as to what the permissibility of torture should be, especially with regards to the famed Ticking Bomb Hypothetical which has been used on multiple occasions to permit and even encourage torture as an information gathering tactic. Baron makes it clear that she recognizes there might be extreme cases where torture is understood as the lesser of two evils, but that the Ticking Bomb Hypothetical should not be considered a viable hypothetical to use to think over circumstances of necessary torture. Dershowitz also agrees that the Ticking Bomb hypothetical is too realistic to act as a true hypothetical, that any torture allowed would eventually grow and spread to all forms of information…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the only way to save the citizen’s lives is to subject the terrorist to the most excruciating possible pain, how can we not do so? Is torturing the terrorist unconstitutional? Most likely. But millions of lives definitely outweigh constitutionality. Is torture a barbaric practice?…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Wrong To Torture

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Interrogating one man can help reveal additional information to help foil any other possible plans the terrorist may have up his sleeves. In addition the utilitarian principle still applies in this situation. In fact, it is even more justifiable, because the torturer only places one person in pain. Not only do you get to save more lives, but torturing someone only causes them temporary physical pain. Killing thousands is permanent damage.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They put on a kind of thick jacket, which fastened me to the chair. . . . My chest was so tightened that I couldn’t breathe properly. Plus, the air circulation was worse than the first trip. . . . I was literally suffocating inside the bag around my head. . . . They stuffed the air between my clothes and me with ice cubes from my neck to my ankles, and whenever the ice melted they put in new hard ice cubes.…

    • 1856 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Wrong To Torture Wrong

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    overlooked by almost all nations. Under the just war theory, once an enemy surrenders, they are not a threat to you anymore. It pretty much implies that it is wrong to torture and mistreat your enemies under almost any circumstance. As we know, many nations do not abide by this. We hear about prisoners being waterboarded, strapped to a mattress frame and electrocuted, and all sorts of horrible things.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A male terrorist, by the name of KSM, attacks the United States causing Americans to swarm crazy in fear. With KSM in custody, it is now the government officials’ responsibility to retrieve information from KSM in order to prevent future terrorist attacks. When brought into custody, the CIA also brought in KSM’s children. Coming up with strategies on how to get KSM to talk, the idea of torturing his children as leverage presented itself. When reacting to KSM’s terrorist attack, John Stuart Mill, a British Philosopher and a Utilitarian, would most likely torture the children in order to retrieve information about KSM’s terrorist group which would prevent future terrorist attacks and protect the happiness of the greater good of society.…

    • 2027 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It may be argued that what if the plane has already taken off. Then how is the terrorist supposed to disarm it? He can’t magically fly to the plane and if he is going to give instructions over the phone, then so can a member of the bomb squad. Nobody’s life should be taken for granted especially if they are innocent, but there are many alternatives to the same problem which can be easier than trying to torture someone because torturing does not guarantee he will still tell you anything. For all we know the terrorist might actually want to die so he or she was not planning on telling how to disarm it in the first place and was just trying to buy more time so there would be no possible way to save…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Tick, tick, tick”. A bomb has been planted in a civilian building, and a mastermind terrorist has been captured. This, a very real scenario, is one that often threatens our government. So the main debate is what the government should do with the terrorist.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I do believe in Utilitarianism and with this system the best would have been to kill the terrorists at the moment because it benefited the people. However, my situational ethics would have interfered with my thinking and I would have applied ethics of care. This is because I consider killing a child is wrong. Although I do believe in completing the mission and be successful about it, I do not think everything should be done on my hands to complete a mission. Other options came up as the mission was being completed but it was in the best interest to analyze all of them.…

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the first 4 weeks of this class we have had many class discussions and readings, which have brought up a great deal of thinking. The class name Organization Ethics and Decision-making, speaks for itself when it comes to the things that can be talked about in this class. Our world is changing each and everyday and you have to stay on top of the way things are. In this reflection essay I will hit on different topics and speak in different ways that ethical decisions and value systems work and how my view and knowledge on these have changed. Each individual will go about making decisions in a way that he or she sees fit based on there beliefs and teaching.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays