Gay Marriage Film Analysis

Improved Essays
Marriage has been a widely debated topic throughout the centuries. The definition of marriage has been defined by presidents, teachers, doctors, religious men, psychologists and philosophers. According to the 2015 revised Merriam-Webster dictionary marriage is defined as “the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law [and] the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage” (“Marriage.”). In the film Love Story the main characters, Oliver and Jenny, fall in love and decide to marry soon afterwards. Oliver is a wealthy Harvard Law School student while Jenny is a poor Radcliffe University student. …show more content…
Virginia case that made it illegal for states to ban interracial marriages. Now that interracial couples were given this right, gay couples wanted the same rights. All throughout the United States homosexuals tried to gain this right but everywhere they tried, they would get stumped. In 1972 during Baker v. Nelson marriage rights were denied to gays in Minnesota while in Georgia during the 1986 case of Bowers v. Hardwick homosexual sodomy was banned. On the Pacific coast in Hawaii a state constitutional amendment was passed banning the union between homosexuals (Wolf). To make matters worse for the gay couples in 1996 President Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act, also known as the DOMA, defined marriage to be between a man and a woman and allowed states to refuse the recognition of same sex marriages (“United…”). This ruling caused more than 1,000 federal laws about marriage to become inapplicable to gay couples. These laws not only took away the dignity and equality of gay families but also denied basic human rights (Boonin). During this time period support of gay marriage was at a mere 27% (Smith, …show more content…
would answer this issue (Cintron). At first the legal movement began to lose and in many cases the state decided to fully ban the marriages from occurring. The interesting point of this is that most states where it was banned came from a ballot vote and not courts and legislatures. There is more of an acceptance of the marriage rights by those in the government, especially democrats, than the average American. The opposition to this comes from religious reasoning in the sense that gay couples undermine what marriage is (Smith, P). One noticeable opposition from religions that is changing is that of the Roman Catholic Church. Pope Benedict XVI in 2005 refers to homosexuality as “A strong tendency ordered towards an intrinsic moral evil” and an “Objective disorder” (Donadio). But according to the New York Times, Pope Francis says that homosexuals should be treated with dignity and that the only problem he sees is that they are making a lobby of it. He was the first pope to speak and say the term “gay”. On a plane ride from Brazil Pope Francis stated that “If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?” (Donadio). Although opposition is high, slowly states began to pass laws that made the marriage legal starting with New England and moving towards California. The next major milestone in the gay rights movement occurred in June of the year 2013 during the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell vs Hodges June 26, 2015. The United States Supreme Court finalized the case known as Obergefell vs Hodges. The case involved a decades long battle between states and people on weather or not gay marriage should be legalized. Same-sex couples, and other advocates of same-sex marriage sued their state marriage agencies in Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee on weather or not their right to refuse same-sex marriage was violating the 14th Amendment, which addresses many parts of the right of US Citizens. [ Obergefell v. Hodges.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    History Of Dual Federalism

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Supreme Court argued that prohibiting same-sex marriage was a violation of the Bill of Rights, therefore, it was unconstitutional. That decision required the states to comply with the ruling and changed their constitutions to allow same-sex marriages, even if they did not approved the ruling…

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For these couples, their natural rights were being revoked and “thrown away.” Riot after riot changes sadly weren’t being made and same-sex couples were still being discriminated against. However after further investigation, the supreme was able to see that this negligence was a direct violation of the constitution. After June 26, 2015 the Supreme Court ruled by a 5-to-4 vote that the Constitution guarantees a right to same-sex marriage. This day is a true testament to the ideas and concepts created by the enlightenment thinkers.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gay marriage is an issue that is similar to nearly every controversial issue in America History. Most conscientious social issues in America life begin with a large majority of traditionalists pushing back, then some dramatic event event will usually occur, following that public opinion will slowly start to even out, and eventually past actions/ideas will be seen as prejudiced. It's like America collectively goes through the stages of grief before we see social justice: Denial, a lot of anger, barraging, sadness, and then finally acceptance. Along with million of Americans who felt similarly, we saw denial in Senator Jesse Helms by saying that homosexuals were morally wrenched, and believing that homosexuality was a choice. Collectively, we saw the anger in families across the country disowning their children; similarly there was anger in the viscous murder of Matthew Shepard.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Loving V. Virginia In 1953, twenty-three year Richard Loving (white) and seventeen year old Mildred Jeter (black), who lived in Virginia at the time, went to the District of Columbia to get married to avoid violating Virginia’s anti-miscegenation, or interracial marriage, laws. When they moved back to Virginia, a grand jury of the Caroline County Circuit Court in October of 1958 issued a charge against the Lovings for breaking anti-miscegenation statutes in the Virginia law code. On January 6, 1959, the Lovings pleaded guilty to the charge and were sentenced to one year in prison, but the judge suspended their rule on one condition: that they stayed out of the state of Virginia for twenty five years. The judge in the case, Leon M. Bazile,…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Section 20-109

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are only a limited number of ways to terminate alimony or spousal support. Section 20-109(A) of the Virginia Code states that one of those ways is to show that, based upon clear and convincing evidence, the spouse receiving support has been habitually cohabiting with another person in a relationship analogous to a marriage for one year or more. Given that gay marriage is now legal in Virginia, you might think that “cohabitating with another person in a relationship analogous to a marriage” applies to opposite-sex and same-sex couples alike. Not according to the Virginia Court of Appeals in the recent case of Luttrell v. Cucco. Luttrell v. Cucco…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case: Plessy v. Ferguson Cite: 163 U.S. 537 (1896) Vote: 7-1 Opinion: Brown Facts: • In 1890 Louisiana passed the Separate Car Act. o Required different cars for blacks and whites on railroads. • A group of citizens formed Comité des Citoyens in order to repeal and/or fight the laws effect.…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell v. Hodges Summary and Analysis This 2015 landmark Supreme Court case questions the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans and is the consolidation of six federal cases from the Fourth Circuit. In district court, judges found in favor of the same-sex couples. However, the Fourth Circuit court reversed these rulings and found same-sex marriage bans constitutional under the doctrine of stare decisis with regards to the 1971 landmark case Baker v. Nelson, wherein the Supreme Court implicitly endorsed the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans by dismissing the case (different from not issuing certiorari), tacitly upholding the Minnesota Supreme Court’s rationale that the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans is a political question.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What would someone do if one’s better half had to be separated by law because of the state they lived in? Richard Loving and his “colored” wife Mildred had to go through that same situation when they lived in their home in the state of Virginia while illegally being married. After being kicked out of their home state, Richard and Mildred decided to take their issue to the Supreme Court and later their story becomes an inspirational documentary. While there are many stories out there about illegal intermarriage and its impact on the people, The Lovings act of civil disobedience in illegal marriage played a crucial role in ending the prohibition in interracial marriage in America. Richard and Mildred Loving lived a simple country life in their home state of Virginia.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court practiced the use of the supremacy clause by over riding states laws and establishing a law for all the land of gay marriage being legal. No matter what laws states had prior to this regarding marriage became irrelevant because of this new law from the Supreme Court. Gay marriage has always been extremely controversial in the United States. Everyone seems to have a view on it that stems from their religion or personal…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I thank my colleagues for providing the background, history and facts of the particular cases leading up to 2015, after the Obergefell v Hodges opinion. I would like to briefly summarize the path and give a glimpse of what the future might look like for marriage in the United States. In 1986 in Bowers v Hardwick The Supreme Court under the leadership of Chief Justice Warren Burger rejected a challenge to Georgia’s sodomy law. The court found that the claim that, “homosexual sodomy” was protected under the constitution was “at best facetious”.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the beginning of time, people have fought over their different opinions. With different opinions, there are bound to be a lot of arguments. Some of the arguments can be big or small, and other arguments people do not like to speak of. One of the most confidential is the right for LGBT communities right to be able to get married. This is an ongoing problem that needs to be settled one way or another.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2003 Massachusetts was the first state to legalize same-sex marriage. Prior to the U.S. Supreme court ‘s 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges ruling, the state of same-sex marriage in America was always in flux. From early beginnings, both proponents and opponents of same-sex marriage have asserted controversial arguments. Before the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on Oct. 6, 2014, declining to hear the case of same-sex marriage. Thirty-one states have either constitutionally or statutory provisions that explicitly defined marriage as one man and one women.…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is apparent that Baehr v. Lewin may pave the way for same-sex marriages in Hawaii, but DoMA prevents other states from being forced to recognize their laws. That is why it is important that we in Texas repeal our sodomy law, and legally recognize same-sex marriage, making it possible for gays to be able to enjoy the full benefits of the life-long commitment of love. Hopefully, the generations of the future will be able to look back at gay discrimination as current society looks back at the ridiculousness of sex and race-based discrimination. Works Cited Bull, Chris. Scene of the Crime.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Same Sex Marriage

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    Catholics believe in many of the same principles other traditional Christians believe: traditional marriage is the only marriage pleasing to God and ultimately for man. Pope Benedict the 16th himself conveyed opposition to gay marriage, not “approv[ing] of legal initiatives that imply a re-evaluation of the life of the couple and the family” (“Should Gay Marriage Be Legal?”). The LDS Church has also spoken out about its strong opposition to same-sex marriage. They believe that “marriage between a man and a woman was instituted by God and is central to His plan for His children and for the well-being of society”( “Church Instructs Leaders on Same-Sex Marriage”). The laws of God, they believe, cannot be altered by what man’s laws shift to as time moves on.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Superior Essays