I believe that the last candidate interviewed should be the one that is hired. This decision is based upon my evaluation on several factors. First, the urgency of the position that needs to be filled. This position is an integral part of the organization and should be filled post haste. Second, the professional and business like quality of the candidate in question. The candidate in question presented a level of professionality that seemed fit for the position. However, her make-up seemed to be a little bit on the extreme side, but I do not believe this to be a major issue looking at the bigger picture. Third, how the candidate measured up to the others. We have interviewed around 100 candidates and in the end we decided that three were worth
…show more content…
The position is integral in our organization and should be filled as soon as possible. We have already had an extensive interview process that has taken up quite a bit of time while looking at the applications of 100 candidates. It is also known that we will be interacting with other professionals in our field. This leads me to believe that if everyone knows that we are supposed to be a conglomerate of four professionals, but we show up missing a member, it will damage our image. Missing a member could leave people with the impression that we lack the motivation or the competence to complete our team. Conversely, if we take to much time to run through the hiring process again, it could leave our clients with the same impression of …show more content…
Honestly, in my opinion, it was no contest. The other candidates compared to her were extremely subpar, and didn’t seem to have prepared nearly as much as she did. In hindsight, I believe that she would be the best person to employee into our organization. Her ability to answer our questions and exude an atmosphere that made us consider her, despite her bold appearance, is something that the other interviewees lacked. While she may not be the best person to solely represent us, she won’t be the only face of our company. We are a team, so she will simply be a part of the face. Also, as Sarah pointed out it could actually end up in a law suit if we do not hire her. June also agrees that we need to fill the position as soon as possible. Compared to the other candidates she seems to hold the best possibility in completing our
The position is integral in our organization and should be filled as soon as possible. We have already had an extensive interview process that has taken up quite a bit of time while looking at the applications of 100 candidates. It is also known that we will be interacting with other professionals in our field. This leads me to believe that if everyone knows that we are supposed to be a conglomerate of four professionals, but we show up missing a member, it will damage our image. Missing a member could leave people with the impression that we lack the motivation or the competence to complete our team. Conversely, if we take to much time to run through the hiring process again, it could leave our clients with the same impression of …show more content…
Honestly, in my opinion, it was no contest. The other candidates compared to her were extremely subpar, and didn’t seem to have prepared nearly as much as she did. In hindsight, I believe that she would be the best person to employee into our organization. Her ability to answer our questions and exude an atmosphere that made us consider her, despite her bold appearance, is something that the other interviewees lacked. While she may not be the best person to solely represent us, she won’t be the only face of our company. We are a team, so she will simply be a part of the face. Also, as Sarah pointed out it could actually end up in a law suit if we do not hire her. June also agrees that we need to fill the position as soon as possible. Compared to the other candidates she seems to hold the best possibility in completing our