Public Opinion Essay

Improved Essays
Public opinion defines the aggregate views, attitudes or beliefs held by the society concerning certain aspects or topics (Soroka, & Wlezien, 2010). Public opinion is very relevant in the American society since the political moves, actions and decisions are shaped by their opinions on various aspects of the government (Cohen, 2006). Further, it is prudent to recognize that public opinion is crucial in the explanation of the manner in which political parties, candidates and the political arena behaves because politicians seek to do what citizens may wish to see accomplished (Soroka, & Wlezien, 2010). In addition, public opinion explicates the justification and reasons for the execution of specific government policies and their outcomes. Although …show more content…
With money replacing time and membership in the interest groups, the levels of democracy are slowly diminishing. Given that such groups are established to act as voices for the minority or sidelined groups, their influence over national politics is on a slowing verge (Jones, 2009). Thus, such entities end up representing interests that are not in line with those of their members. Indeed, such opinions have also been voiced given that groups without an affluent base may not have enough momentum to present the interest of their members to the legislature of influence policies in a certain direction (Han, 2016). With such status, the poor and the disadvantaged in the society are the ones who are mostly left out of the democratic process and their voices are not heard. An example of an organization that has strong influence because of its money is the American Medical Association (Han, 2016). In most cases, it has been posited that it lobbies for certain interests rather than acting on a common societal good. Such comments have also been forwarded in the case of the American Bar Association that has numerous political advantages emanating from its affluent membership (Jones,

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Federalist No. 10 Analysis

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Essentially, if the political system is not set up to limit majorities, those with similar ideas and interests can form groups that overwhelm minority interest groups.1 Therefore, tyranny of the majority truly reflects a concern in how the high minded ideal of representation can also undermine…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Running for office is difficult task. Candidates have to deal with tasks such as finding money to run their campaign, convincing the public they will be able to make a difference, and incorporating the public’s views into their campaigns. Throughout their campaign, candidates are influenced by extra-constitutional actors, such as the media, public opinion, interest groups, and political parties. In the election of governor in Massachusetts this year, it can be seen that all of these extra-constitutional actors have influenced the candidates. All of the extra-constitutional actors exist to inform, motivate, and educate voters, but each one has its own individual goal.…

    • 1963 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In democracy, public opinion is very important for politicians because citizens are the ones who elect their office representatives, at the same time citizens have to act together to solve collective action problems. Polls express citizens’ public opinion that government pays attention and mobilize their campaigns around these opinions. However, a person has a combination of different beliefs, feelings and behavior about politics based on information and knowledge that has been acquired throughout different sources. Also, how consistent and strong are these attitudes vary by person. In addition, at individual level opinion on certain issues, evaluations of candidates, campaigns, and parties are based on five different factors.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guided by Voices The wealthy and well-to-do taking up 83 percent of Congress in H.H., NY, NJ, and taking up 88 percent of congress in MD, VA, and S.C, shows a lack of voice through political representation of only the wealthy. Lack of voice can create a world where no one's problems are heard and not a single person knows what's happening around them. Voice is being able to speak one’s opinion without fear of persecution, having the ability to participate in government, and to inform others of news concerning oneself, the country and society. Having the ability to speak one's opinion is necessary in society so that those in charge can take into consideration their position of issues and make the issues more well known.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are two empirical results that Bartels observes about the poor to support Frymer’s theory. The first piece of evidence to support this is campaign contribution. Bartel’s findings shed light on the fact that Senators are six times as likely to respond to the views of typically affluent constituents as well as middle constituents rather than have no contact in regard to the views of low income constituents (Bartels 280). These captured groups are at a huge disadvantage, according to Frymers, in getting social or economic issues passed because minorities ideologically hardly agree with white swing voters. These outcomes have a major consequence because the government is making it accessible to stop political action that might benefit captured groups rather than fulfilling these specific policies.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Amendment Cons

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although the Constitution as ratified in 1788 excluded several key demographics, developments throughout history have steadily rendered our democracy more inclusive, creating the promise of a government in which all people have a voice in its path forward. However, one recent Supreme Court decision has acted as a deadly corrosive agent for the promise of democracy in America; the majority in the Supreme Court case Citizens United v. FEC has extended First Amendment speech rights to include unlimited donations made by corporations. The decision has opened floodgates allowing the wealthiest Americans to exercise increased control over the political process, thus drowning out the voices of the majority. In order to recover from this striking blow…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most Americans, when asked, would probably say that we live in a democracy of some variety. In a 2003 Gallup poll that surveyed 1008 Americans, 70% said they were either satisfied or very satisfied with the way democracy words in the country (Gallup 2003). Historically, apart from the multi-decade interlude known as the Gilded Age, the system of governance in the United States could most aptly be described as a democratic republic. Under a democratic republic, ordinary citizens elect representatives to support their interests in government. But is that still the case?…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the present state of politics in the United States of America, in which many aspects of our current society are debated, the conclusions of citizens correlate with the…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ultimate goal of most politically inclined interest group are to shape public polices in way that it supports the group’s interests, values, or beliefs. This goal is accomplished in two strategies in which sometimes both is used, one is the electoral strategy which is an attempt to influence the selection of public officials. Second strategy is the legislative strategy which is to influence the decisions that elected officials, bureaucrats, or members of the judiciary make. For those interests groups that decide to use the electoral strategy they do so by using tactics such as campaign spending, endorsements, voter mobilization and education, and…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    From watching the frontline documentary and reading the book, I think that interest groups have too much influence in American politics. Interest groups are seen to be everywhere in the nation and I believe that by them creating a great deal of controversy helps to create a division between the government and its people. Interest groups first objective is not political influence but simple survival, which helps to shape a group’s political activity. The issue that I see constantly arising is that the American government is more responsive to special interest rather than public interest. This often results in the public being disappointed with the way the political system is set up and making individuals feel as though they’re at a loss.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My question is drawn from the Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Pages 1-15. The quote that inspired my question was, “In a political debate, the man who is forming a judgement is making a decision about his own vital interests.” This quote made me think about the people I know who have risen above themselves and who seek to help others. People who volunteer frequently, donate large percentages of their paychecks, and people who always hold the door open for others are the people who come to mind. Obviously, these people have their own self-interests as well, but they also spend a noticeable amount of their time helping others and looking out for our society as well.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argument Essay

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the articles “Three Cheers for the Nanny State,” “Ban the Ban!,” and “Soda’s a Problem but…”, all three authors present their arguments with facts, opinions, and counterclaims. However, one article presents itself better than the rest. I believe that the article “Soda’s a Problem, but...” was the most convincing article. Sarah Conly- the author who wrote “Three Cheers for the Nanny State”- argues that the soda restriction is a good idea because people would be stopped from making foolish decisions that they’ll pretty definitely regret.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s modern democracy, political parties and interest groups play a huge projecting role in the United States government and it is rising quickly. Political parties and interest groups are organized groups of people who work towards specific goals within the government, promoting politicians and raising money to help accomplish certain needs. While yes, both groups are working towards similar goals they often times serve different purposes within the country’s political system. The real question is whether or not either of these groups are helping improve America or if they are helping to diminish the American political system. The most familiar group known amongst people around the country is the idea of political parties.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter three, in the 5th edition of American Government: Your voice, your future, is about how public opinions, attitudes, and beliefs are established and used politically. Chapter three also touches on polling and its use in the political system, government power, and the differences between liberalism and conservatism. As stated in the text, Americans do not share the same concerns when it comes to how involved the government is in everyday living. Statistics offer a closer look at how these differences vary depending on race, sex, and demographic. Specifically, when it comes to the difference in opinion between the sexes, a clear viewpoint is displayed.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Keeping the Peace – Responsibility for Insuring Domestic Tranquility in the United States Insure domestic tranquility is one of the most important clauses in the Preamble to the Constitution because it provides an overriding guideline about the importance of keeping peace within the United States. The United States’ founding fathers defined this phrase as the promise to run the country will be run as perfectly as can be. Domestic tranquility means no fighting between the states and peace in the public. A better understanding of who controls this theme has evolved throughout the country’s history. Although the general public had some power in issues in the country, the idea of insuring domestic tranquility evolved from the people responsible for keeping the country calm and peaceful to the government taking over the responsibility because the government had more power and control than the people.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays