I agree with you that determining which framework to use is a key component to successfully analyzing and improving the implementation. I understand why the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) supports the use of ISTA. Understanding and addressing unintended consequences is vital in the healthcare environment because unintended consequences can have positive or negative impacts on the healthcare organization and on patient safety (ONC, n.d.).
However, I believe the ONC is short-sighted in identifying only one framework to focus their training efforts on. In the examples used, it is obvious that the FITT framework could be used to identify task-technology issues. And the ability to measure outcomes, benefit, and behavior changes are also important in any health information technology (HIT) endeavor. …show more content…
Perhaps a hybrid framework may evolve to further help healthcare organizations to better understand and manage the complexity of HIT implementations. The different frameworks are not something I had previous knowledge of when I was involved in various HIT
However, I believe the ONC is short-sighted in identifying only one framework to focus their training efforts on. In the examples used, it is obvious that the FITT framework could be used to identify task-technology issues. And the ability to measure outcomes, benefit, and behavior changes are also important in any health information technology (HIT) endeavor. …show more content…
Perhaps a hybrid framework may evolve to further help healthcare organizations to better understand and manage the complexity of HIT implementations. The different frameworks are not something I had previous knowledge of when I was involved in various HIT