Is Gun Control Good Or Bad

Superior Essays
Gun control has and is an ongoing controversial topic in the United States of America. In past recent years, there has been an increase in mass shootings in schools and in other public places such as movie theaters and dance clubs. It is very worrisome for a person to have in mind that at any given moment our lives could be endangered. For this reason, there has been a discussion of whether gun control is helpful to our country or not. There are many arguments for enforcing and implementing stricter gun control laws that will help decrease violent crimes in the country. Unfortunately, gun control does not help decrease violent crimes, but negatively affects those law abiding citizens of the United States. Going against gun control is more beneficial …show more content…
As a matter of fact, the crime rates in some states that have a majority of gun-owners have dropped (Procon.org 5). According to “More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws” by John R. Lott, he says that the largest increase of ownership of guns in the states has the most decrease of violent crimes. Despite the number of mass shootings that have occurred in that past year, the country has had a significant decrease in crimes since the early 1990s (Davidson 1). People are not aware that “most gun-related deaths are suicides, not murders” (Davidson). Therefore, gun control laws do not help prevent violence, nor stop crimes from occurring. Even if there are laws set in place it would only effect those law abiding citizens because criminals do not follow the law. In a result of surveys taken by inmates on how they obtained their weapons, inmates said they obtained their weapons from the black or grey market (Davidson 3). Gun control laws will only make it more difficult for law abiding citizens to obtain a gun if stricter policies are set in place. Another study done between 1980 and 2009, found that banning guns and restrictions on carrying a concealed weapon in some states had an increased amount of murderers that were gun-related (Procon.org 4). Moreover gun control is not the solution in stopping crimes, according to Wilson in 2000 the comparison of people who were …show more content…
Not only does it cause law abiding citizens to feel that their safety and rights are being infringed but it does not help prevent violent crimes. As has been mentioned, in some states the more gun-owners there were resulted in less violent crimes to occur. Despite the amount of laws that could be placed to prevent criminals from obtaining weapons there are still black markets and other illegal ways for them to get guns. Unfortunately, gun control would only be affecting those who abide by the law in obtain guns and using them. The United States should not be a place where people fear for their lives and have no way of protecting themselves. For that reason, the Second amendment is in place for every citizen to have the right to bear arms whether it be to protect oneself from a tyrannical government or from criminals. Gun control is not the answer in deterring crimes, but instead infringes in all citizens right to own a gun and jeopardizes their safety if they cannot use a firearm for

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This belief, however, is disproved by evidence. If guns are made illegal to own, law-abiding citizens will then turn in their guns. However, those who wish to do harm with their guns would keep their guns illegally. Therefore, these laws not only take guns away from responsible citizens, but give those who wish to keep their guns an unfair advantage if they were to attack another person (ProCon.org). Gun control laws are ineffective and should not be in present in today’s society.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They would rather buy a gun off the black market because more than likely the serial number will not be present on the weapon. It will be scratched off so the weapon cannot be tracked. “The result of these studies appear to indicate that gun control laws have no effect on criminals.” (Alters 1) As a result, even though there are gun laws in place, criminals find a way around it. Criminals always have. This is often argued by people since they tend to ignore the fact that criminals will always have weapons.…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The law to take away guns would not affect criminals, because criminals do not follow the law. Without guns for protection, the law-abiding citizens would be helpless to defend themselves against the criminals who would now be the only citizens with guns. The law that was meant to protect would actually lead to the victimization and possible death of law-abiding citizens. This victimization of the defenseless is even prevalent if the criminal does not have a gun. The government of the United Kingdom banned handguns, and over the following years, not only did murder go up, but more people were being killed by knives and strangulation…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns do not kill people; people kill people. Shooting a gun does not simply happen by itself, but the person behind the gun pulling the trigger. By regulating gun laws, we may say that by having stricter gun control, it will be difficult for criminals to get a hold of a gun, but it does not mean that there will be less crime or fewer deaths. Criminals do not follow the law regardless, so what makes everyone think that by having gun control, or by regulating gun laws that it will change the way things are. Therefore, there should not be stricter gun control laws in the United States.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why should the government take away people 's guns rights when they use them for self-defense LaPierre and others argue, “that not only gun-carrying individuals ward off attackers, but criminals are deterred because they do not know who does or does not carry a concealed weapon.”(Mantel 9). If criminals are scared that good people are carrying guns also, they will be less likely to commit a crime. If criminals do try and shoot others, there will be good people there to protect themselves with their guns. The streets will be safer and allow society to become better however others believe otherwise. Allowing people to carry guns on the street will increase the crime rate many believe.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Guns Are Bad

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Your normal citizen doesn't have drugs, but bad people do. If guns are taken away, only the good people won't have them. ( Ronald Cruise). The gun control law is not being followed by some citizens, therefore more rules are being added to the law towards gun control a good background check will keep the guns out of people who should not have them to prevent criminal, drug dealers, domestic abusers, and mentally ill people from carrying the gun. therefore, people who do not follow this law should face consequences, for example, time in jail or police taking gun licene from guns holder.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If more people are encouraged to possess concealed firearms, then more criminals would be deterred from committing crimes. Lott argues that “the expected penalty of the crime affects the prospective criminal’s desire to commit a crime”(6). However, Kleck argues the opposite. He says that by restricting the supply of firearms within the country and tightening security at the Mexico border, less violence will happen. Making sure there are essentially no firearms are in circulation would lead to dramatically less gun violence, as it would make it increasingly difficult for a criminal or a mentally ill person to possess a firearm.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns are not the problem, people are. Gun laws will only prevent law abiding citizens from getting guns to protect themselves from both legally and illegally armed criminals. People often misunderstand the purpose of the Second Amendment. Many anti gun argue that the Second Amendment is out dated…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just because there may be an interrelationship, or correlation, between two concepts does not mean that one is necessarily going to lead to the other. Establishing strict gun laws would put unnecessary restrictions on law-abiding citizens; therefore, they should not be enacted. Stringent gun laws do not always effectively prevent crime as criminals will still have their own connections to a gun in order to commit a crime; people need to stop playing the blame game and become educated about guns and the safety regarding them. Laws are put into place to give order; not to take away a basic right, such as the right to bare arms. If the right to bare arms were to be taken away, what would be taken away next, if that doesn’t solve the “problem”?…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Argument Essay

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages

    People have taken advantage of certain laws that have been passed in the following years. Some don’t even care about the consequences of their choices and how it affects others. The plans the government with gun control just won’t work. Gun control will not stop a single thing because people can find a way around it in a heartbeat. They think the shootings that are happening now are bad, but they need to see what will happen when they try to make it harder for those who are planning to do something against the law or horrible things with guns.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays