Genetically Modified Foods Should Be Labeled: Article Analysis

Improved Essays
Genetically modified organisms also known as genetically modified foods or GMO are foods that contain some DNA of an animal, bacteria, or plant. Many may find GMOs as a good or bad system that technology has ever created. But the real question is whether we should have labeled foods that are genetically modified. In the article, “Why Genetically Modified Foods should be Labeled” written by Carole Bartolotto argues why we should have labeled foods. While in the article written by Josh Davis, “ Why we shouldn't Label GMO foods” states reasons in why genetically modified foods shouldn't be labeled. Both articles show their differences in respect with the health and environmental issues GMOs may or may not have, also the idea that both articles …show more content…
In other words if the GMOs food labeling happens who benefits it from happening, the people or the biotech companies? Davis illustrates in his article, GMOs have benefited millions of people and well as it has also helped food pricing by keeping it from increasing. In which Davis states, “…has benefited millions, if not billions of people in the developing world, and prevented countless famines.” The idea that the people aren't being affected by the genetically modified foods under no circumstances, so labeling would only outlaw the US law ruling that GMOs already have according to Davis in this article. Furthermore, Bartolottos believes the the only ones that are being benefited from not labeling GMOs are the biotech companies and food manufacturers as they are the ones receiving millions for bringing that type of technology into the world. As she concludes her article by stating, “ If you are supplying a product and we don't want it, then the market dictates it will go away. This is why the biotech companies and food manufacturers will probably spend over 25 million dollars to prevent the labeling of GMOs.” That if people know what there truly is in there food they wouldn't want GMOs and that is what the industries don't want to label the GMOs because they are afraid of losing their …show more content…
Many authors have opposing positions on this topic as no laws have been done recently regarding the tagging of these foods. As in the article written by Carole Bartolotto, “Why Genetically Modified Foods Should be Labeled “ explains the reasons in why the labeling of GMOs should happen. While on the other hand in the article, “Why We Shouldn't Label GMO Foods” written by Josh Davis exposes the reasoning of why these GMOs shouldn't be identified. As these two articles bring out the different opinions among the health and environment concerns, they also question themselves of whom these labelings benefit. With the common grounds that biotech companies don't want the labelings of the genetic modified foods as well as the perception that there needs to be more experimentation with these foods that contain

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Gmo Labeling Pros And Cons

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this scenario, consumers will have a better choice (Carter and Gruère, 2003). Mandatory labeling of GMOs also does not provide customers with any useful information. On the contrary, it further intensifies the misconception of GM food being Frankenfood. GM food is essentially not that different from breeding different species of a crop. Both have their DNA modified.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most GM produce have been developed to produce the introduction of resistance to plant diseases or of increased tolerance to herbicides. There is a dispute if the government should make labeling GM foods mandatory for companies. Those who are not in favor of mandatory labeling feel this way because mandatory labeling will falsely make the GMO foods appear to be unsafe, as supported by the Boston Globe, and there is no need for mandatory labeling because the FDA already checks our food. There are those who feel labeling GM foods should be mandatory because of the customers’ right to know what is in their food, as shown through an ABC poll, and mandatory labeling will lead to less production of GMOs, as proven by Dr. Byrne. While there are ways to support both sides, it is clear that labeling GM foods should be mandatory for food companies because of ethical purposes, supported by Paul Ramsey, scientific benefits, shown through Andrew Starbird, and GM food’s possibility to cause allergies, illustrated through Jon Entine’s investigation of an article in Elle magazine written by Caitlin Shetterly.…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These risks are not only for those eating the GMO foods, but for nature and the environment as well. Those who are pro-GMO argue that currently there are no known long term effects of eating genetically modified foods. This is not true for several reasons. First off, long term effects may be yet to show in the near future. This is demonstrated as Jane E. Brody writes, “A legitimate safety concern involves possible delayed deleterious effects of genetically modified products on consumers, the environment or the ' 'balance ' ' of nature” (Brody 3).…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Otherwise, if GM foods such as GM peas probably have no adverse effects on animal testing, but this situation does not mean GM foods are safe for humans, because there have no enough strict specific dangerous assessments to guarantee the GM food safety for humans(6). In fact, scientists should test more initial safety experiments and followed by clinical experiments with volunteers to discover any possible harmful effects. Another most controversial issue is the unpredictable consequence of GM food on the environment. For example, scientists concern GM food may disrupt ecosystem processes, and people perhaps not see the negative effects on the environment because of the outcome which GM food affection for the environment may appear many years later (4). In addition, there are many strange and needless genes would be introduced in the traditional plants,…

    • 1613 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gmo Research Paper

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages

    And although Leu is right to think that overpopulation is not a real and pressing issue (Ellis), he is blatantly incorrect in coming to the conclusion that since overpopulation is not the issue, starvation is can be fixed by “natural means.” Leu is mistaken because humans have been genetically modifying organisms since the beginning of time, modification is not new, and even organic plants have been engineered over millions of years to become the foods people eat today. They have been modified for human benefit, just like GMOs. If no plants had been modified to support human populations, then we would not have the population we have today (Ellis; “Should You Worry”). Now, with a global population that is growing faster than ever before, humans need a faster way to continue the modifying of organisms. Genetic engineering is the answer and GMO farming can promote that self-sufficient…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Well, the facts point to the contrary. If someone simply web-searched “genetically modified foods” without any specific subject, they would encounter overwhelming criticisms and dangers of genetically modified foods. This paper aims to disapprove claims that the foods are safe for human consumption by presenting scientific evidence showing how they are harmful (Wald 34). Scientific evidence indicates that GMOs are harmful to human health. Additionally, there are indications that transgenic crops lead to destructions of the environment.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Monsanto Pros And Cons

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages

    According to Monsanto, there is not a needed requirement to label genetically modified foods appearing on supermarket shelves. Many consumers just want to be aware of what foods are being genetically modified, but Monsanto automatically disagrees on the bill (Barrett). This would generally make the public feel skeptical over Monsanto’s true motive in the biotech industry. Why would Monsanto and other companies want to hide whether or not some crop has been genetically modified? The reason could be that genetically modified crops and its “dose” of Round-Up Ready do result with many negative effects as well as possibly being the start to all food security problems due to its recent discovery and insubstantial safety verifications.…

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jessica Emerson a writer from The Santa Fe New Mexican also argues Genetically Modified Foods should be labeled. She discusses why the unlabeled food shouldn’t be forced on unsuspecting consumers. She describes genetically modified products as carrying antibiotic resistant genes. Also there is no law requiring genetically modified food to be labeled. She lists unknown allergies and the right for people to know as her main concerns.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They say the crops are environmentally safe and practically the same thing as an organic plant. For that reason they don’t believe GM foods should be labeled and consumers shouldn 't know. It has a very big impact because it could be very dangerous to eat because of all the unknown things about GM foods. Since there is so much about GM foods to be discovered and how it affect the human body the severity could be drastic. The scope of the problem is people just want to have the ability to know if what they are eating and feeding their family is a GM food.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gmo Myth Or Fact

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Alan Mchughen, an University of California, Riverside researcher has concluded, “if the United States banned GMOs outright, it probably would not cause a huge impact, apart from driving up the price of food.” He also talked about U.S. farmers getting upset because 90% who have the ability to grow modified crops do so. The largest impact of banning genetically modified organisms would be seen in countries such as sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. They would not get by without GMOs because it is the products of drought resistant seed that allow prime growth. These facts show that it may not change our food system drastically to ban them, just make buying groceries harder for some families. However it does show that modified crops are the lifeline to people in other parts of the world.…

    • 1687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays