The Importance Of Formal Strategic Planning

Improved Essays
1. Discuss the accuracy of this statement: Formal strategic planning systems are irrelevant for firms competing in high-technology industries where the pace of change is so rapid that plans are routinely made obsolete by unforeseen events.
Formal strategic planning systems are not the best when competing in high-technology industries where the pace of change is so rapid that plans are routinely made obsolete by unforeseen events. Strategy is important in any business for the benefit of success. What is formal strategic planning? Strategic planning is a development in a business that is comprised of goal planning that are short and long in term. The formality is incorporated when goal planning is developed with a set mission statement along
…show more content…
Competitive advantage is established when an unpredicted strategy is executed successfully that are “rare, valuable, and non-substitutable” (SBA, 2014). A company’s competitive advantages are likely to endure over time if there is low to no competition in the same area of business. A business will also maintain the advantage over competition if the surrounding atmosphere has no demand. “Competitiveness derives from an ability to build, at lower cost and more speedily than competitors, the core competencies that spawn unanticipated products” (Prahalad & Hamel, 1990). Built within a company’s formal strategic plan would be specific and identifiable proficiencies that allow a competitive advantage to be developed using a well detailed palpable set of assets. Times will continue to change and a company must develop the ability to sustain for the long-term. What is desired today may no longer have a demand in the future. Continuous improvements developed within a company allows for frequent advancement to maintain that competitive advantage over the competition. For example, Cornell University uses a continuum improvement model to maintain excellence. Wheatley (2014) explained that Cornell understands the need to continuously improve and the “synergy and power that …show more content…
Goal planning is developed with a mission statement and goals aligned with objectives to meet the needs of the business. Strategy and luck can play apart in businesses success and demise. Great companies can be are lucky as they decide what to do in these particular situations and achieve the most from the opportunity (Raynor, Ahmed & Hamilton, 2009). To sustain success for extended periods of time, strategic planning is necessary. “Luck is in eliminable one is never in complete control of ones actions and omissions” (Zimmerman, 1987, p. 382). Luck is a small portion that can be attributed to the success of a business, but not all successes are attributed to luck. Strategic planning incorporates what to do in situations that also may include the lucky moments as well; but success and failure cannot be attributed to just luck. Luck is the grand equalizer, because almost everyone can benefit from it (Gresham,

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The expense will become cost prohibitive, should the company change its image, branding, and human resource at every transitional period. It is also linear and efficient because it only concerns with the goals the company had set before itself, and the ability to achieve it, nothing more. All the company has to do is to set a goals, define the means of achieving those goals, and compile the list of activities that can accomplish the means in order to achieve the goal. This model of strategy is focused primarily on profits, as opposed to increasing human value. Though not an ideal model of strategy in many ways, largely in part on ignoring the human value aspect, rational strategy is still sought after in many cases because it can be measured and calculated precisely after considering all available angles and avenues, making it easier and less costly to follow compared to dynamic strategy.…

    • 2059 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    What is the benefit of using Outsourcing in 80% of our non-core activity? Do we need a company to help us think or execute? Or even both? Issues not impossible to give, but difficult to justify in a standardized and scientific way for many organizations. On the contrary, for service providers the big question remains on knowing the best model to follow, it is certain that if the model sold so it's good, but can the model improvement bring best turnovers?…

    • 4397 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Business Strategy Essay

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Besides that, collusion can be tacit, where there is no direct communication between competing firms. Tacit collusion can be successful if there are only few competitors, costs are alike among firms, price leader act by a firm, there is common industry culture that implementing cooperation strategies, there is a high frequency of small sales orders, fluctuations demand is dealt using large inventories and order backlogs, and keep out new competitors by having high entry barriers (Wheelen and Hunger, 2008). 2.1.2.2 Strategic…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monopolies make happy companies, which are so, for different reasons. The different reasons are generated from the uniqueness of each company with regard to their market offerings. More competition according to Thiel & Masters is like more war and the result is that there is no gain. Every single startup should seek that uniqueness that shall help it drive the monopoly agenda, if the probability of making it in the market is…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The contingency theory is contrasting the situational leadership theory, as here targets are track on daily basis, where as in other only good situation makes units to raise profitable seeing example of seasonal business the situational leadership seems to useless. There is only one point where both theories match up that is there is no single path which is correct for achieve the success targets (Jack Welch 2007). In the traditional leadership methods some of theories are implication that is great man theory, behavioral leadership theory, trait theory of leadership etc. these theories is putting focus on individual distinctive leaders who is efficient and effective in influencing the huge followers to follows on its views and goals. In the profitable business, the complexity increase as some distinct theories like traditional ones they executed other factors also plays vital role in success of organization.…

    • 2218 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction When an innovative output comes out to the world, people are inclined to believe that the company that created the product is successful. If a successful business were merely meant to inspire people, developing a distinctive output might be only one necessary condition of it. However, a company is defined as “an organization that sells goods or services in order to make money” (company, 2016). For that reason, success in business means commercial one and a business with a unique product would not be successful until it generates a large amount of financial gains. Making profits can be considered separately in two perspectives, management and marketing.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Business Strategy Analysis

    • 1035 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To the shifting boundaries that comprise business strategy with the concepts of shareholder and stakeholder capitalism. We have also contrasted the differing views on strategy creation from both designed and emergent strategy, arrive at the view that both is required to afford a firm the opportunity to be able to deliver on its strategic goals. Lastly the author of this paper has defined strategy as being able to determine a vision that allows a one to be able to not only compete in the right arena, in addition to bring to bear the best tools and options it has to be able to achieve victory or…

    • 1035 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    • How much money it needs to fulfil its plans. • What makes it likely to succeed. • What threats or disadvantages must be overcome on the way. (O'Kane, 2010) Planning is a core activity for business and is a process by which an organisation can set goals and then select the means to achieve these objectives. Without plans, a company will be unable to co-ordinate…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A key aspect of business strategy refers to competing with rival businesses in an industry. In a perfectly competitive industry, firms would have great issues with competing in the market, it is however very unlikely that such industries exist as it is a theoretical market. In a perfectly competitive market, there are many buyers and sellers, who have no control of price as the good which they are supplying are identical, meaning that substitutes are widely available. This type of industry does not bode well for businesses aiming to have long-run success and profitability. While a detailed plan may be a useful tool for a business, this is not a strategy within itself, as plans alone do not result in sales of products.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Research has found that a strong informal system is not sufficient to guarantee ethical decisions and behaviors, and that companies such as XYZ Corporation are more vulnerable to influences encouraging unethical behaviors when there are not formal policies and procedures in place (Falkenberg & Herremans, 1995). Third, the incentive structure will work because it appeals to employees’ locusts of control, the sense of how much control one has over an outcome, and employees with an internal locus of control behave more ethically (Trevino & Youngblood, 1990). The incentive structure will work because employees’ actions will now directly affect their compensation. Finally, the dual solution will work because it fills the void of two missing layers of the organizational culture. Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner (1998) propose three layers of culture: the outer layer, or observable reality; the middle layer, or group norms and values; and the core, or assumptions about existence.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays