Fallacious Argumentative Essay

Improved Essays
Aren’t fallacious arguments fallacious?
Fallacies: According to me and up to my understanding fallacies are the statements or any argument made by us in debates, for which we don’t have proper reasoning. Fallacies can be true or false either. These are some of the fallacious arguments I found in the script of the film “12 angry men”.
(1)There were 11 votes for guilty. It’s not so easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first.
In this argument he is not sure that the boy is guilty or not he just want to talk, before making any decision. He don’t have proper reason why he is voting against community, maybe he wanted to be special.
(2)I may have an idea here. I am just thinking out loud now, but it seems
…show more content…
He is making argument by directly saying that boy is guilty. And all the logical arguments which are proving the innocence of boy are fairy tales.
(7)Look, supposing you answer me this. If the kid didn’t kill him, who did?
Here the guy is sure about the point that only boy can kill his father, and no one in the world do the same. He is trying to make a counter argument that if the kid didn’t kill his father then who did? In these type of fallacies counter argument are made to make people believe that the original argument is true.
(8)This is not easy. So far, it’s only a feeling I have. A feeling. Perhaps you don’t understand.
Well you can’t make any belief just based on your feeling which obviously other people can’t feel. The argument is fallacious because this don’t have any proper reasoning and formatting too.
(9)How do you like him? It’s like talking into a dead phone.
Well this man is calling the boy guilty just because he don’t like the boy. He is thinking that the boy is bully and that’s why he killed his father, that’s it. He don’t need any evidence to prove the boy guilty.
(10) What are you people talking about? Are you calling the old man a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the two texts ‘On the Waterfront’ and ‘Twelve Angry Men’, the protagonists face conflicts through standing up for what is right and standing alone by telling others what is right. In ‘On the Waterfront’, Terry Malloy faces the conflict of whether to or not to testify against Johnny Friendly. Terry has an inner conflict with Edie when he isn’t sure if he should stay ‘Deaf & Dumb’ or testify. Father Barry and Edie continually challenge Terry which then gives him the courage to testify against Friendly. Elia Kazan, the director of this text, shows that triumph can only be achieved when one overcomes its self-interest.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Wood says, “argument seeks to establish what is probably true as well as what might be expedient or desirable for the future” (124). This provides emphasis for what the purpose of an argument is. The entire chapter revolves around the idea of an argument, therefore Wood purposely explains what an argument from that. From there, the reader is able to understand that there is no need to argue…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1 page 27) The wisdom of the 9th juror which has developed over the years through his experiences in life grants him insight which aids not only himself but some of the other jurors’ to come to terms with the innocence of the boy. Thus, the 9th juror’s age plays a major role in his decision-making.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A fundamental aspect of the American justice system is the right of every person accused of a crime, to a trial by jury. The defendant, presumed ‘innocent until proven guilty’, has the right to be judged by a group of his or her peers based on the evidence presented, the assumption being that the defendant will be judged in a fair and impartial manner. However, human beings are fallible and can be subject to faulty reasoning, alongside irrational and biased thinking. The play Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose is set in a mid twentieth century American jury room. Twelve strangers, all male, are brought together to deliberate the facts of a seemingly straightforward case, a young man accused of murdering his father; their decision, which must be unanimous, will either take, or save a young mans life.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    NAME: Swathesh Shetty DATE: 12/10/2015 Leadership for Global Citizenship Questionnaire for the movie “12 Angry Men” 1. In one or two sentences, answer the following: a) What is the purpose of the 12 person jury? The purpose of the 12 person jury is to unanimously decide whether the accused is guilty or not guilty of the offence for killing his father based on the data and evidence gathered during the trail in the court.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guiltiness of Father Flynn in Doubt Being accused of child molestation can have devastating effects on someone's life even if the accusation is false. In Doubt: A Parable by John Patrick Shanley, a priest is forced to deal with these accusations from his own co-workers. No hard evidence is given by the author and the reader is left to determine if Father Flynn is guilty or not. Based on the evidence John Patrick Shanley gives in his play, Doubt: A Parable, I conclude that Father Flynn is guilty because of his affinity for the boys and his defensive nature for them.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argument Essay

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the articles “Three Cheers for the Nanny State,” “Ban the Ban!,” and “Soda’s a Problem but…”, all three authors present their arguments with facts, opinions, and counterclaims. However, one article presents itself better than the rest. I believe that the article “Soda’s a Problem, but...” was the most convincing article. Sarah Conly- the author who wrote “Three Cheers for the Nanny State”- argues that the soda restriction is a good idea because people would be stopped from making foolish decisions that they’ll pretty definitely regret.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuading someone to take your side in an argument is not an easy task to accomplish. There are many things a person must learn in order to become an effective persuader. In the movie twelve angry men, persuasion plays a huge role; as the jury has to decide whether the boy (who is accused of murdering his father) is guilty or innocent. This movie is a great example of ad hominem; which is a logical fallacy in which the argument is countered by attacking the person, their motive, or other things relating to the person who is making the argument. In the movie, every juror is convinced that the boy is guilty of the crime; but there is one juror, juror number eight pleads not guilty.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Like juror #3 he said, “you pulled a real smart trick here, but you proved absolutely zero. Maybe there are ten knives like that, so what? I cannot believe how juror #3 is not thinking right! At least he has to give a chance to the boy instead of taking it so personal or in a very rude way. Juror # 3 shows so much irritation about the boys’ case.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The film Twelve Angry Men (1957) exhibited the power of an eyewitness, the characteristics of the defendant, and the power of group influence that affects the jury. Throughout the film, the reliability of the eyewitness was questioned. There were two eyewitnesses in the movie, the old man, who lives in the apartment below of the crime scene, and the old woman, who lives across the street. According to the film, there is a possibility that the eyewitnesses misinformed the jury about the crime scene. Eyewitnesses may not be as reliable as they are thought to be.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He states that the women do not have much of a choice. Due to this, we see that not much tangible evidence is used in the courts in Salem. On the other hand, 12 Angry Men is set in a time period where words have to be proven to be true in order for someone to be convicted of a crime. Reginald Rose emphasizes the following scene, “(NO. 8 takes the diagram and sets it up on a chair so that all can see it. NO. 8 looks it over.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the main topics that was displayed in the movie was conformity. Conformity can be described as the act of changing one’s behavior to fit in with a group (Crutchfield, 1955). After the closing arguments of the trial, deliberations by the jurors begin on whether the boy is guilty or not. As the jurors make themselves comfortable in the jury room, casual exchanges are made between the jurors. This is where the first step of conformity takes place.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror #8 In the play “Twelve Angry Men” the Juror No.8 was a very important character, without him there would not have been any conflict and the young boy would have been executed without a proper trial. An Architect by profession, he stood out from the rest of jurors. He had the gift for intuitive thinking, understanding complex human relationships and inspiring others. He believed in trial-by-jury system and did his best to have the necessary procedures to come up with a fair outcome.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Peer Pressure: Peer pressure effects on individual decision making. Therefore, it influenced the jurors to think for themselves. For example, juror number two was easily swayed by opinions of others. He had no confidence in himself and his own beliefs.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Negotiation Analysis

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    A few examples would be with juror 7- voted guilty because he had a baseball game to get to, and after a long while of arguing juror 8 decided that if no one else votes not guilty then he would vote guilty and that would be the concluding verdict. The first alliance is at the beginning after everyone but juror 8 voted guilty. Juror 9 steps in and gives him a chance to explain why he doesn't find the boy guilty. This juror didn't get offended or ignorant to what juror 8 had to say. As the day goes by, jurors 3,7 and 10 make an alliance that would eventually change as more and more thoughts are said.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Improved Essays