Evolution Vs Religion

Improved Essays
The age old question concerning the emergence of human life hangs on the lips of many, in which evolution and faith intersect. Numerous theologians, philosophers, and scientists have put forth proposals and taken center stage on debate platforms, for the sake of persuasion over these topics. Charles Darwin is an infamous example, as he theorized on the inklings of the formation of life on Earth. Whether or not someone adopts a faith-based mindset, science is part of God’s creation, with major differences lying in the creation of human beings. The division of science and Christian faith is attributed to Darwin publicizing his notions, and Entwistle (2015) claims it as “the most momentous event,” making it a major catalyst for this separation …show more content…
Certain church leaders utilize the pulpit and/or Bible studies to further the emphasis on faith and the Scriptural creation story. I attended a church that openly discussed the issues of evolution and faith via a weekly group that viewed a series titled The Truth Project, sponsored by Focus on the Family. Interestingly, a Pew Research article discusses comments asserted by the current Pope Francis concerning the Roman Catholic Church’s viewpoint on evolution, as it states, “evolution in nature is not inconsistent” (Masci, 2014, para. 1). Thus, there is a mixture of methods taken to address evolution and faith; whereas, other churches simply do not address such …show more content…
30-31). It is within the Protestant group that the aspects of liberal and fundamental mindsets evolved, and these trends have continued past the late nineteenth century. Growing up in a Lutheran church offered me a liberal side, as the focus leaned towards the moral teachings of Jesus, rather than the intertwining of science and faith, matching the liberal Protestants of the late nineteenth century. As an adult and a born-again Christian, my experiences have shifted more to fundamentalist ideals, by taking to heart what God’s Word claims. Yet, this includes adhering to the advice given in scripture, “Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are of God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world” (1 John 4:1, NKJV). Discernment does not mean taking everyone at his or her word, but learning to make wise judgment calls by guidance of the Holy

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Here many creationists would object that all humans have been created by a higher power and dismiss evolution as nonsense. Sonder suggests that an abundant amount of Darwin’s theory is supported by the reputable findings of Gregor Mendel, a monk who discovered evidence that humans share some genetic patterns with a variety of other organisms (12). Edward J. Larson’s work in “Summer for the Gods” allows his audience a great deal of information on the matter of the comparing evolution and creationism. Many Americans, despite apparent evidence…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An Analysis of & critical response to Alvin Plantiga’s EAAN In the book Science and Religion: are they compatible? Plantiga seeks to establish the idea that theism is perfectly compatible with modern science, which he does rather successfully in his argument against Daniel Dennet. He accomplishes this by addressing one of the most controversial subjects in the Science-Religion relationship, evolution.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In modern times religion and science are increasingly becoming viewed as incompatible, or at least non-overlapping. Damien Keown states that “Scientific discoveries, and theories such as evolution, have challenged many traditional Christian teachings…” at the expense of making them appear “...dogmatic, irrational, and backward-looking” (119). Despite its brief history in the West, Buddhism has gained increasing popularity in part due to its frequent portrayal as an exception to the conflict between scientific and spiritual thought. Proponents of this view—deemed “Buddhist Modernists” or “Secular Buddhists”—argue that Buddhism possesses certain qualities which make it compatible with a secular view of the world, while providing a source of purpose…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Scopes Trial

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Pages

    One who has encountered the Scopes Trial will understand that there is conflict in society as to whether or not, Christianity or Evolution should be taught in a classroom. Most of those with a secular world view will stand behind their belief that, for science classes in particular, evolution should be the building blocks of the students’ knowledge. On the other hand, individuals with a Christian worldview will stand by their belief that the Bible and its truth should be the foundation of education.…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Theistic evolution is one of three main origin of life world views. The other two are atheistic evolution (also commonly known as Darwinian evolution and naturalistic evolution) and special creation. Atheistic evolution states that there is no God and that life can and did materialize physically from already existing, non-living beginning accumulations of matter under the power of natural laws (like gravity, etc), although the beginning of those natural laws is not justified. Special creation states that God created life immediately, either from nothing or from already existing resources.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As many people realize, for almost two hundred years the work of Charles Darwin and his contribution to the origin of species has dramatically changed our world and wholly defined the study of biology and all other subsets of that science. Indeed, the concepts such as natural selection and evolution have been embraced by much of the Western thought. But when these ideas where first announced in 1858, rivalry did as well. The next year “On the Origin of Species” was exceedingly controversial and hated by the majority of the educated world. Christianity was the religion, philosophy, and the “science” of the day; as it had been for almost thousands of years.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The debate on whether man was created or whether we evolved from animal is still a debate that occurs even today. However during the time of Charles Darwin it was a shock and was “welcomed by atheists and feared by theists”. (Bergman, 2001) Social Darwinism also took flight which believed that humans struggled for existence and…

    • 1603 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the opening paragraph, Wilson explains that he no longer practices the Baptist faith (400). However, Wilson is quick to establish a common ground with…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For centuries, religion has been a topic of great debate and interest, stemming from the validity of ideals to reasons why people believe in it in the first place. Despite all the efforts over time to thwart religion, it has managed to remain as a prominent structure. One question that seems to always be brought to the table is how religion continues to exist in light of the continual advances of science. The reason religion continues to exist today is not because the furthering of science leads to disproving religion, but rather because religion addresses questions that currently not even the advances of science can answer, giving people a sense of unity and congregation based upon two key emotions: hope and fear.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Repeatedly in this trial, Plaintiffs’ scientific experts testified that the theory of evolution represents good science, is overwhelmingly accepted by the scientific community, and that it in no way conflicts with, nor does it deny, the existence of a divine creator. … The fact that a scientific theory cannot yet render an explanation on every point should not be used as a pretext to thrust an untestable alternative hypothesis grounded in religion into the science classroom or to misrepresent well-established scientific propositions” (Kitzmiller v. Dover district). Clarifying the timeline and judicial support of “good science” allows teachers in the CPS community to move forward without entrenching on the beliefs of…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critiquing the Concept of NOMA In Non-Overlapping Magisteria, Stephen Jay Gould argues that religion and science do not contradict each other because each have separate magisterial, or domains of teaching authority. He claims that values and ethics are within the magisterium of religion, while empirical facts and theories are within the realm of science, and the two magisteria do not overlap. Gould claims that NOMA is a principled position that is supported on moral and intellectual grounds; however I argue that science and religion do contradict each other, and religious claims should be subject to empirical and philosophical investigation. Gould immediately begins by discounting all creationist views as illegitimate because “creationism is a local and parochial…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Religion continues to argue against Darwin’s theories so throughout the history of time Darwin’s theories and Religious theories have been on opposite sides of a…

    • 1297 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charles Darwin originally called religion into question when he believed that humans were not created by God, but instead created from other species. Richard Dawkins had the same ideals. He did not believe that humans were God’s creation, but rather that they came from similar genes that started from bacteria. Todd Douglas is a Canadian Journalist who went to school at Vancouver School of Theology. “Such hard-edged atheism is now more strongly linked with biology than any other science…many biologists, suffer from a lack of understanding about spirituality and faith, which do not rely only on empirical proof, but on inductive reasoning.”…

    • 2304 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is creationism science, pseudoscience, or non-science? Support your argument with an analysis of the distinction between science, pseudoscience, and non-science. Mainstream society is very familiar with the word “science” and that without a doubt science plays a detrimental role in our lives. However for many people there seems to be a discrepancy about the correct distinguishiment between science, pseudo-science and non-science. The aims of this essay are to establish the differences between science, pseudo-science and non-science, before then examining the appropriate categorization of “creationism science”.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, scientists believe in the theory of evolution. They believe organisms change over time as a result allowing it to adapt to its environment better. This helps it survive and have more offspring, which leads to the development of humans from apes. Scientists has proven evolution by fossil, anatomical, and molecular records. While both Christians and scientists have their theories, creationism is based on beliefs, whereas evolution is based on facts and data, therefore it’s more accurate.…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays